Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 09 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Dalai_Hills_Panorama.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Dalai Hills Panorama Mussoorie, India --Navneetsharmaiit 19:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Yitzilitt 22:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Too noisy, too dark, unfavorable composition with too much sky, horizon bulged. Sorry --Milseburg 23:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice scenery, but noisy in the sky and distance, not very sharp and very dark in the right foreground. -- Ikan Kekek 10:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Piquero_patirrojo_(Sula_sula),_Punta_Pitt,_isla_de_San_Cristóbal,_islas_Galápagos,_Ecuador,_2015-07-24,_DD_65.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Red-footed booby (Sula sula), Punta Pitt, San Cristobal Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 18:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. Legs are slightly unsharp, but I consider it not critical --LexKurochkin 06:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Lighting is not good --Charlesjsharp 18:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charles. --Peulle 12:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Blue_Water_Bridge_panorama.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Blue Water Bridge, Ontario - Michigan. --The Cosmonaut 04:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. I also expect more sharpness also when taking night shots, especially when the resolution is small. --Milseburg 22:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree with Milseburg. IMO this is an awesome motif and nicely stitched. However the lens seems to have been fogged up, see the halos, and there could be a bit more headroom. Otherwise the composition is good as well. --Etaped (talk) 17:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)