Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 31 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Weligama beach (5).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Les pirogues à balancier sur la plage de Weligama, Matara_District .- Sri Lanka .- Asie du Sud.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Medium69 15:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I find the crop unfornate (and the light is IMHO wrong). Please discuss. --C messier 18:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose bad crop and bad light --Elrond 15:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

File:2009-09-22-luftbild-berlin-by-RalfR-06.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Französisch Buchholz (Berlin) --Ralf Roletschek 22:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment QI für mich, wenn es weniger Rotstich hat, Ralf! --Hubertl 08:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment Weißabgleich ist auf weiße Häuser gemacht. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Ok, wenn du meinst, dann ist es so. --Hubertl 00:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, poor quality IMO: Poor DOF (f/5.6), right bottom third of the picture is blurred and without detail, chromatic aberrations. Perhaps oversaturation--Lmbuga 18:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Lmbuga, sorry --A.Savin 14:25, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CA, unsharp. -- Smial 16:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Neutral I think the image was made from an airplane. So f/5.6 is OK. But 1/500 s is a long time. IMO that's the reason why the image is blurred. --XRay 20:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose same as Lmbuga --Hasenläufer 23:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:32, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Faculty of Biological Science at University of Chittagong (03).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Faculty of Biological Science at University of Chittagong --Moheen Reeyad 20:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. Very nice! --Michael Barera 03:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overexposed sky with posterisation. Maybe fixable if there is raw. --C messier 13:47, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, quality is not sufficient for a QI --A.Savin 14:31, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, the sky is over exposed --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 15:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC)