Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 23 2013
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Nafplion, Greece, View from Palamidi. By User:Tillea --XRay 18:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Withdrawn I withdraw my nominationfile to small--XRay 21:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Civil-law notary sign, Soyaux, Charente, France. --JLPC 17:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:25, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The observatory of Johann Gottlieb Friedrich von Bohnenberger in the garden of Hohentübingen castle, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 16:46, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:25, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, Simeonstiftplatz 2 --Berthold Werner 13:33, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Solfatara (Pozzuoli), Campi Flegrei, Campania, Italy. --NorbertNagel 12:23, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Could be cropped but good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake Bled in Slovenia --Urmas83 12:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:41, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Highway A5 --NorbertNagel 11:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:46, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lars Oberg, Berlin politician (SPD) and member of the Abgeordnetenhaus of Berlin (as of 2013). --DerHexer 11:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:46, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martin Delius, Berlin politician (Pirate party) and member of the Abgeordnetenhaus of Berlin (as of 2013). --DerHexer 11:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Braun Series 7 799c-7 electric shaver --Florian Fuchs 11:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
I am reluctant, why so small? Poco a poco 11:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
I uploaded a new version with a higher resolution, although I must admit that I don't know why anyone would need it :) - Promotion We don't know what will be the usage of this material in the future. It could end up prited out in a truck trailer e.g. please, always try to upload the highest resolution posible, that's what most people here do, QI btw --Poco a poco 01:10, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination Braun Series 7 799c-7 electric shaver --Florian Fuchs 11:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination European Praying Mantis. Lisboa, Portugal. Alvesgaspar 11:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice --Poco a poco 11:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Egyptian grasshopper (detail) -- Alvesgaspar 10:59, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Wow! --NorbertNagel 12:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque on the pavement of the compass rose all around the obelisk. The west wind. Saint Peter's Square, Vatican City.--Jebulon 09:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Peter's Basilica, via della Conciliazione, Sant'Angelo bridge, night view, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 09:52, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice! --NorbertNagel 12:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church San Rocco, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 09:46, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lighthouse in Świnoujście, Poland --XRay 07:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Lacks sharpness, tilted ccw, sorry --Poco a poco 12:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Ann, the Virgin and Child, church of Sainte-Enimie, Lozère, France --Myrabella 07:34, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Mirador Corrales de Guize, Fuerteventura --Llez 07:23, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Could be a bit too much saturation but ok --Poco a poco 12:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 06:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle can jalpí located in arenys de munt province of barcelona-Catalonia-Spain --Alberto-g-rovi 05:05, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Nice motive but some issues here: perspective, lack of sharpness, oversharpening --Poco a poco 11:57, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination nests of eudocimus ruber in the wetlands of the oceanografic in valencia-Spain --Alberto-g-rovi 05:05, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mebon Oriental, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 03:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Srah Srang, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 03:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ta Keo, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 03:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Bridge Inn, Pateley Bridge., Mattbuck 00:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Disturbing shadow in the bottom could be removed, but ok --Poco a poco 12:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cultural heritage monument Unna, Germany. A 034 --Smial 21:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion QI imo.maybe better with less foreground?--ArildV 01:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to show that thing in its surrounding, bright white with all green around. Going closer or tighter cropping would not show the "real" impression. The building is rather small. -- Smial 07:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Port of Rianxo. 2013. Galicia (Spain) --Lmbuga 21:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lactarius pterosporus --Holleday 20:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hydnellum peckii --Holleday 20:15, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hydnellum peckii --Holleday 20:14, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boletus erythropus --Holleday 20:13, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Very Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dandelion flowers (Taraxacum officinale) --Kreuzschnabel 19:46, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice light! --NorbertNagel 11:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western sitatunga in the zoo of bioparc de valencia-Spain Alberto-g-rovi 18:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
The trunk in the foreground is disturbing, could you crop it? Furthermore the species is needed Poco a poco 19:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Done> retouched image --Alberto-g-rovi 05:00,20 December 2013 (UTC) - Promotion Ok, I added the species --Poco a poco 01:15, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination Western sitatunga in the zoo of bioparc de valencia-Spain Alberto-g-rovi 18:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marilyn Monroe bottle opener --NorbertNagel 14:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion There is something wrong with the background to the left of the bottom --A.Savin 16:23, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
New version with more homogeneous backgroud uploaded. Please not that the background is not fully homogeneous because it is a blue wall and not artifical. --NorbertNagel 11:41, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
OK. --A.Savin 13:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the New Augusteum main building of Leipzig University --Tuxyso 19:08, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good photo quality. But there should be a permission statement of the University of Leipzig. --XRay 10:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
I sent an email to the press department of the university. Probably they will reply after Christmas. --Tuxyso 16:39, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A night view of Saint Peter's Basilica, from Umberto I bridge, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 16:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
Nice but a strange reflection on the upper part of the picture. --JLPC 17:30, 18 December 2013 (UTC) Ben où ça ?--Jebulon 20:41, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
It's very slight but visible (see note in French, please !) --JLPC 12:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Done OK. J'ai vu. Bizarre. Corrigé.--Jebulon 17:53, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Support now. --JLPC 18:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bangkok Old Town --Urmas83 09:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Really nice, but needs perspective and CA removal on the edges --A.Savin 16:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC) Done I did my best! --Urmas83 13:10, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
OK for the CA, but still tilted. --A.Savin 16:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Can you show me witch part is disturbing you. If i make the background building all upright, the towers will be unrealistic. --82.131.12.73 19:34, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
I can only state that the horizontal lines of the buildings are not straight and that there is still a perspective distortion on the left. Have a look at the picture at 100 % zoom. --A.Savin 23:26, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Done I did one more correction. --Urmas83 10:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
OK for QI imo. --A.Savin 13:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cactus in the Joshua Tree National Park, California, USA.--XRay 07:59, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion I am not fully convinced but imho nonetheless QI. The cactus in the front in comletely in shadow. There is some noise on the sky. Can you reduce it? When I was at this place I could not make photos due to a strong thunderstorm :( --Tuxyso 18:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Fixed I've noise reduced and the shadows are (a little bit) brighter. (No Thunderstorms at the day the photos were taken - but really hot for germans. We just stopped for a few minutes.)--XRay 07:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Liquid cooling system «Immers». --PereslavlFoto 00:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, partially unsharp, perspective problems, disturbing elements. --XRay 10:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Iguazu Falls, in Misiones (Argentina) (by S23678). --ArionEstar 22:52, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support A lot of haze, but IMO still QI. --XRay 10:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Loosely translated: breathing roots (pneumatoforen) a cypress (Taxodium distichum) in the Famberhorst.--
Famberhorst 16:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 10:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination Loosely translated: breathing roots (pneumatoforen) a cypress (Taxodium distichum) in the Famberhorst.--
-
- Nomination Old US 66 in Miami, OK. By AbeEzekowitz. --Admrboltz 15:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry, I miss sharpness. --XRay 10:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gomphrena globosa single (by Nirmal Dulal). --ArionEstar 14:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry, it's not really sharp. --XRay 10:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christmas decorated house in Hürth, Germany, at night --Achim Raschka 13:45, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry. It's amazing, but unsharp and the dark parts too dark. --XRay 10:41, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tapu Island, Phuket, Thailand --Poco a poco 08:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 10:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Angkor Wat, Cambodia --Poco a poco 08:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 10:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bayon, Angkor Thom, Cambodia --Poco a poco 08:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 10:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Impatiens. Nice somewhat rampant plant in partial shade.--
Famberhorst 15:58, 14 December 2013 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 11:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination Impatiens. Nice somewhat rampant plant in partial shade.--
-
- Nomination Kłodzko, Franciscan Monastery --Halicki 22:04, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose unsharp and posterization in the sky --Christian Ferrer 12:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Town --Halicki 22:04, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose unsharp and posterization in the sky --Christian Ferrer 12:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Wodna Gate --Halicki 22:04, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose unsharp --Christian Ferrer 12:33, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hoar frost --ComputerHotline 21:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hoar frost --ComputerHotline 21:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose just a little part is sharp --Christian Ferrer 12:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hoar frost --ComputerHotline 21:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hoar frost --ComputerHotline 21:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose not entire sharp --Christian Ferrer 06:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hoar frost --ComputerHotline 21:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hoar frost --ComputerHotline 21:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose not entire sharp --Christian Ferrer 06:28, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hoar frost --ComputerHotline 21:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose not entire sharp --Christian Ferrer 06:28, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hoar frost --ComputerHotline 20:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:24, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hoar frost on tree --ComputerHotline 20:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Comment It surely needs a better description, I'm not shure about the quality of the photo. BTW some reviewers hate it when the same description is given to several items --Moroder 18:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:28, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marianne Burkert-Eulitz, deputy of Abgeordnetenhaus Berlin --A.Savin 17:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:24, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clematis tangutica (pappus)--
Famberhorst 16:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC) - Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination Clematis tangutica (pappus)--
-
- Nomination Walter Kern, North Rhine-Westphalian politician (CDU) and member of the Landtag of North Rhine-Westphalia. --DerHexer 13:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the third station of the Cross: Jesus falls the first time. Woodcarved polychromed relief by Josef Moroder-Lusenberg in Laghel Arco --Moroder 12:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Je suis content que tu es appris à te servir de ton i-phone --Christian Ferrer 19:52, 18 December 2013 (UTC) CommentMerci, j'espère que tu as étudié le histogramme ;-))--Moroder 19:57, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Käpt’n Blaubär und Hein Blöd auf der Gera in Erfurt --Stepro 10:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support main subject is ok --Christian Ferrer 06:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake Windermere. Mattbuck 08:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:09, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crewe railway station. Mattbuck 08:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:09, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fort Point (and Golden Gate Bridge), San Francisco, California, USA --XRay 07:11, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Excessive and unaesthetic perspective distortion , feel free to put to discuss --Moroder 12:42, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment No problem. Thanks for review. You're right, the perspective is unusual.--XRay 07:13, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:2013-12-06_Orkan_Xaver_in_Warnemünde_12.jpg
[edit]- Nomination storm Xaver in Warnemünde, 2013 from User:Jonas Rogowski --Ralf Roletschek 23:25, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Very good quality. --XRay 07:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose-- Sorry but I don't agree. The composition and subject are very good but the image is too noisy; please look at the sky -- Alvesgaspar 12:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC)- I did some careful and slight noise reduction, aot. I wonder about the level of expectations, though: I don't think there was much noise.--Cartoffel 03:35, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Better now, I have reverted my oppose vote. -- Alvesgaspar 13:33, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Another rework only reducing colour noise should have done. -- Smial 09:09, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment -- I don't think it can be saved because the lack of detail and unsharpness is already considerable. More denoising will make it worse. -- Alvesgaspar 19:36, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support A great photo. Noise is inevitable, you need a higher ISO when you want to capture the the nature of storm. It is possible to take a really sharp image of this lighthouse with good weather and clear skies. However, the stormy weather provides a really poignant context to lighthouse: in these conditions the lighthouses where extremely vital for the ships to navigate. In my opinion you don't need to apply noise reduction at all! --Urmas83 12:10, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- this is a really great shot, otherwise I would not have tried to enhance it. I reduced mainly chroma noise but damped luminance noise only a bit to keep details. So the result is still somewhat grainy, but if you zoom in it can be seen that there is no significant additional blur. As for Urmas83: We should not decline images because of high ISO, if this is necessary to get a sharp as possible photo under bad lighting situations. Support QI for me. -- Smial 12:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment -- Yes, we should decline an image because of noise no matter how difficult the shooting conditions were. This is QIC, where image quality is assessed as objectively as possible, according to the image guidelines here. In my opinion this picture has better chances in FPC, where the subjective components of wow and beauty have considerable weigth. -- Alvesgaspar 14:40, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment According to guidelines there must not be "distracting amount of noise". In this picture the noise is not distracting, as it is not in many other pictures that have been rejected. The technical requirements is one side. We should not forget the main goal of QI: "Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects." So don't keep your eye only on technical reguirements, witch are also very important, but on the main goal. I think this photo in valuable, even with noise! --Urmas83 14:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ack. -- Smial 21:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support as Urmas83 --P e z i 11:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Smial 15:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Yambol (Ямбол) - Georgi Benkovski neighbourhood 2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Yambol (Ямбол), Bulgaria - Georgi Benkovski neighbourhood --Pudelek 23:17, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Dust spot at the very left --A.Savin 16:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Halicki 21:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Not this way; please remove the spot first. --A.Savin 15:55, 14 December 2013 (UTC)- Info Removed! --Pudelek 10:12, 16 December 2013 (UTC))
- Support OK now. --A.Savin 19:57, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Cccefalon 12:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Meenikunno_raba_laudtee.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Boardwalk at Meenikunno bog --Urmas83 18:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry but you used the wrong aperture, that makes the picture look washed out. But feel free to revert to discuss after perspective correction --Moroder 18:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sometimes it seems to me that you are not looking at the picture but only the metadata. It is possible to change the metadata information about the aperture and it seems to me that if I had changed it to 1/16 or bigger, you would have approved it. There is no such thing as wrong aperture! It is photographers decision witch aperture to use. Some lenses might be a little unsharp at f/22 but not the one I am using. It is somewhat unsharp because it is HDR. And still so much sharper than some pictures accepted as Featured pictures. I am not desperate to get this picture approved as QI. I just want you to look at the picture and not the metadata. --Urmas83 09:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)*
- Comment This is not the way I do my reviews! I noticed that the picture was not up to the level of a good D800 picture and I wondered why and the high f value is the answer IMHO. An other reason could be the could be the high exposure time (pardon me if I look at your EXIF data) --Moroder 23:44, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sometimes it seems to me that you are not looking at the picture but only the metadata. It is possible to change the metadata information about the aperture and it seems to me that if I had changed it to 1/16 or bigger, you would have approved it. There is no such thing as wrong aperture! It is photographers decision witch aperture to use. Some lenses might be a little unsharp at f/22 but not the one I am using. It is somewhat unsharp because it is HDR. And still so much sharper than some pictures accepted as Featured pictures. I am not desperate to get this picture approved as QI. I just want you to look at the picture and not the metadata. --Urmas83 09:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)*
- CommentAnd it would be good enough if I had captured it with my D80? --Urmas83 16:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose -- I'm not sure what the reason is but there seems to be no sharp parts in this picture. Did you use a tripode? -- Alvesgaspar 20:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- CommentMay be you are puzzled because you don't find where the focus is and you cannot accept the fact that everything is in focus. Tripod was used. It is sharp! It is just low contrast. It's because this is a High Dynamic Range photo and it's taken against the light. --Urmas83 16:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Everything is in focus? That’s the funniest definition of "focus" I’ve ever seen. The nearest object at the lower edge are the least unsharp, the background trees are entirely blurred. --Kreuzschnabel 23:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- It is a panorama and consists of 5 photos, so there are 5 focus points in this photo. Closest object seem naturally shaper, distant objects blurred. If you looked the photo at screen size then its sharp enough. Full size is 5 bigger than your screen, of course it looks blurred. Next time I resize my photos to 2200px longer edge.--Urmas83
- Everything is in focus? That’s the funniest definition of "focus" I’ve ever seen. The nearest object at the lower edge are the least unsharp, the background trees are entirely blurred. --Kreuzschnabel 23:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- CommentMay be you are puzzled because you don't find where the focus is and you cannot accept the fact that everything is in focus. Tripod was used. It is sharp! It is just low contrast. It's because this is a High Dynamic Range photo and it's taken against the light. --Urmas83 16:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice composition but too soft for QI IMHO, and perspective distortion (see the background trees near the edges). --Kreuzschnabel 10:47, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment There is no perspective distortion. It is a raised bog. It looks like a shallow hill because it is a shallow hill. There are no straight lines in nature. Don't want everything to be straightened. --Urmas83 16:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- The trees near the left edge all leaning to the left and the ones on the right edge all leaning to the right is quite natural of course.--Kreuzschnabel 23:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Go and see yourself. --Urmas83
- The trees near the left edge all leaning to the left and the ones on the right edge all leaning to the right is quite natural of course.--Kreuzschnabel 23:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment There is no perspective distortion. It is a raised bog. It looks like a shallow hill because it is a shallow hill. There are no straight lines in nature. Don't want everything to be straightened. --Urmas83 16:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose It lacks very low frequency, it's too flat - like a painting. Looks like too much HDR effect.--Foerster 17:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Support File is updated. --Aleks G 21:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)- Since it was you who uploaded the new file I consider it partly your work, so you’re not supposed to vote for it. --Kreuzschnabel 22:44, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- If someone changes the contrast of a photo it does not make the photo "his work". Anyway I don't approve the changes. The original photo is better. Exactly as I wanted it to be. It was good to see that we have so many digital photography experts amongst us. I wish you nice strong contrast and endlessly straight lines.--Urmas83 08:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Commons have indeed very talented and technically capable photographers; a quick look at our FP galleries illustrates the fact well. The interesting detail is that much of that talent and competence were, in some cases, acquired in this forum through the criticism and suggestion of others, pros and newbies alike. A different matter that you probably are not aware of is that Commons FPC and QIC are not artistic fora although artsy photos are usually welcome here. -- Alvesgaspar 19:44, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- I said "partly his work". Making a derivative work makes him a co-author of the new version. --Kreuzschnabel 07:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- If someone changes the contrast of a photo it does not make the photo "his work". Anyway I don't approve the changes. The original photo is better. Exactly as I wanted it to be. It was good to see that we have so many digital photography experts amongst us. I wish you nice strong contrast and endlessly straight lines.--Urmas83 08:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Since it was you who uploaded the new file I consider it partly your work, so you’re not supposed to vote for it. --Kreuzschnabel 22:44, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Cccefalon 12:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Bristol MMB «75 Netham Weir.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Netham Weir. Mattbuck 08:05, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Review Comment Needs perspective correction (please look at the top on the right). Composition not optimal.--XRay 07:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure that wall is actually vertical. Mattbuck 21:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment Let's discuss.--XRay 07:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Cccefalon 12:48, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Dülmen, Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann (Gewerbegebiet Telgenkamp) -- 2005 -- 1508.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Wiesmann Roadster, Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 14:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose blown whites --A.Savin 17:10, 9 December 2013 (UTC)- Support What against this photo?! For me QI! -- Spurzem 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed I've reduced the lights. So white doesn't look blown.--XRay 05:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support OK. --A.Savin 07:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- weak Support – visible sharpening artifacts around edges at such a small size usually drive me to decline but regarding the fine composition and lighting it’s altogether good enough for me. --Kreuzschnabel 05:47, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- comment - if the photographer (or nominator) could tell me which exact model (MF3? MF30?) and model year this is, that would push me over into a supporting vote... Mr.choppers 23:39, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Cccefalon 12:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Kornkasten_beim_Breitner_Villanders_02.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Barn at the farmhouse "Breitner" Villanders - Northern view --Moroder 14:35, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Halo. White sharpening fringe (roof). Bad lighting. The fence in foreground is disturbing (composition issue)--Jebulon 10:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment You don't like the fence, i'd wish it was wooden but I don't like to cut it - it's a matter of taste and of long dicussion for QI. The lighting is not bad its backlit but you can see every detail. There is no sharpening fringe because there was no sharpening done, the 5 px fringe (1 in one thousend of the size of the picture is a regular fringe with high res digital photography, I explained it several times on my comments. Let's look for other opinions ;-) --Moroder 21:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support QI for me --Christian Ferrer 11:08, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose - colours are very dull - lacking contrast. Also not that sharp. Mattbuck 10:17, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness is more than OK for that resolution. I agree with Mattbuck the image looks dull and I guess some image editing could massively improve this image. Out of the cam photos look seldom really appealing even not with such a good camera like the D800. But I see no reason here to decline it as QI. --Tuxyso 09:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Info I made a slight change in light balance --Moroder 18:38, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Poor lighting due the contre-jour conditions. Alvesgaspar 14:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Cccefalon 12:39, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Oly-EM1-connector.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Olympus OM-D E-M1: bayonet mount, connector pins and image sensor --Kreuzschnabel 14:47, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose The camera is very dirty. Besides the upper right corner is disturbing. --Florian Fuchs 14:59, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Support dirty camera? sorry, lets discuss! to me its QI, the corner can be corrected. --Ralf Roletschek 20:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Done The shadow was cast by the camera belt, I left it there as a framing corresponding to the heavy shadow in the lower left, but I don’t need it there. And sorry I have been using the camera before, I just couldn’t resist ;-) --Kreuzschnabel 20:57, 8 December 2013 (UTC) - Comment Warum arbeitest du mit so komischem Mischlicht? Ich finde das sehr störend, warme Lichter und blaue Schatten. -- Smial 16:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Dieses Bild ist mit reinstem Tageslicht entstanden, unter einem Dachfenster. --Kreuzschnabel 19:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Seltsam. Sah mir nach Blitz + Tageslicht aus. Egal. Dann reflektiert da evtl. etwas ungünstig. Ich habe schon eine ganze Tabletopserie neu machen müssen, weil mir erst am PC-Bildschirm auffiel, das alle Bilder einen komischen, ungleichmäßigen Farbstich hatten. Dann schaute ich an mir herunter und entdeckte, daß ich Schussel einen roten Pullover trug... -- Smial 22:18, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Dieses Bild ist mit reinstem Tageslicht entstanden, unter einem Dachfenster. --Kreuzschnabel 19:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Composition (it looks like falling or flying) and also the crop are disturbing for me. Sorry --Moroder 13:55, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support For me everything looks OK. Some dust is imho no QI issue. --Tuxyso 09:28, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Unfortunate crop. Alvesgaspar 14:26, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Cccefalon 12:36, 22 December 2013 (UTC)