Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 22 2013
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Böhmenkirch quarry --Kreuzschnabel 19:33, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support QI--Lmbuga 21:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zitronenfalter - Gonepteryx rhamni, Männchen (male) --Hockei 19:22, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kamennoostrovsky Avenue in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 17:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality in spite of some noise in the sky --Poco a poco 19:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wall used as a billboard during election campaigns. Sainte-Souline, Charente, France. --JLPC 16:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bike sharing in Moscow, Russia --A.Savin 16:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination helmmycena (Mycena galericulata)--
Famberhorst 16:07, 19 December 2013 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination helmmycena (Mycena galericulata)--
-
- Nomination Birch polypore / birch bracket / razor strop (Piptoporus betulinus), Hesse, Germany. --NorbertNagel 14:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support QI --A.Savin 16:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Birch polypore / birch bracket / razor strop (Piptoporus betulinus), Hesse, Germany. --NorbertNagel 14:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 17:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Miniature brass sculpture - the three wise monkeys --NorbertNagel 14:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Faro Old Town --Urmas83 12:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 18:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chao Say Tevoda, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 10:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me. --JLPC 16:37, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ta Keo, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 10:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support ok --A.Savin 16:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ta Phrom, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 10:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:57, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Phimeanakas, Angkor Thom, Cambodia --Poco a poco 10:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waterfall in Plitvice National Park in Croatia --Urmas83 10:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Fine picture, can you do anything about the CA on the tree branches? --Kreuzschnabel 12:29, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Done I did my best! --Urmas83 13:29, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Support QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 15:06, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cleethorpes railway station. Mattbuck 08:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Poco a poco 11:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reading Traincare Depot. Mattbuck 08:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 15:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Runswick bay. Mattbuck 08:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 10:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oil pump on the peninsula Gnitz (Usedom), Germany --XRay 06:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for QI --NorbertNagel 15:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crucifixion group on the cemetery in Hiddingsel, Dülmen, Germany --XRay 06:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Little bit of oe, just ok --Poco a poco 11:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Montgolfiade 2004 at the Aaseewiesen in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 10:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of an Elongate Melongena, Hemifusus elongatus --Llez 06:19, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 10:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mizoën, Frankrijk (1080 m.) gite d'etape l'emparis.--
Famberhorst 05:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality, good depth - could it get a tiny bit more "snap" in the colors? QI either way, Mr.choppers 23:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination Mizoën, Frankrijk (1080 m.) gite d'etape l'emparis.--
-
- Nomination Abgeordnete des Sächsischen Landtages Patricia Wissel --Stepro 01:29, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Abgeordneter des Sächsischen Landtages Martin Gillo --Stepro 01:29, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1990 GMC Vandura school bus in a field in upstate New York --Mr.choppers 00:40, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 10:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Westminster Palace and bridge, London. -- Alvesgaspar 23:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Stepro 01:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Support "Still there seems to be something wrong technically as if the unsharpness and lack of detail were the result of some wrong exposure solution or poor gear (very high ISO, extreme HDR, poor lens ?) or even a posteriori manipulation." These are your words and I see exactly these mentioned qualities here. But I like it. Why there is no information about the exposure in Metadata?--Urmas83 12:38, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 20 years old Camargue mare (Equus caballus), head in profile, Bellon, Charente, France. --JLPC 17:34, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Bit dark but ok --Poco a poco 20:22, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
A tot of light added. --JLPC 16:47, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panak Island, Phuket, Thailand --Poco a poco 16:41, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 10:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination gewone oesterzwam (Pleurotus ostreatus)--
Famberhorst 16:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC) - Promotion QI for me--Holleday 20:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination gewone oesterzwam (Pleurotus ostreatus)--
-
- Nomination A lake near the base of Copahue volcano. --Ezarate 21:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 10:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trichome of Arabidopsis thaliana (by Heiti Paves) Kruusamägi 01:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me--Holleday 20:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trichome of Arabidopsis thaliana (by Heiti Paves) Kruusamägi 01:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me--Holleday 20:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trichome of Arabidopsis thaliana (by Heiti Paves) Kruusamägi 01:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me--Holleday 20:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Ho Chi Minh City from Bitexco Financial Tower, Vietnam --Poco a poco 10:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Draceane 14:13, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shooting range, Reunification Palace, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 10:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Draceane 14:13, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Southern Cross and Coalsack Dark Nebula. Uploaded by user:Fedaro. --Ganímedes 21:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Stars overexposed ;-) – just kidding,
Support QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 18:49, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rosette of Church of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, Český Těšín, Czech Republic --Halavar 21:45, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support OK for me. --Kreuzschnabel 18:49, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, Villa Weißhaus --Berthold Werner 10:10, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline
The facade is too bright in my opinion Poco a poco 10:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Do the trees look a bit odd to anyone else? Mattbuck 10:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
I noticed motion blur and magenta CA. --Cccefalon 20:55, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Inconclusive result after end of assessment period --Cccefalon 05:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
I'll go ahead and say I think the trees look weird due to CA and blur, and thus this is not QI. Mattbuck 08:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Isla_Ko_Phi_Phi_Don,_Tailandia,_2013-08-19,_DD_13.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Bay and rocky beach at Ko Phi Phi Don Island, Thailand --Poco a poco 10:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Noticable haloing around the hills. Mattbuck 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
New version uploaded, better? Poco a poco 11:26, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment By doing this, the image in general lost a lot of its sharpness. Maybe you should only remove the haloes next to the hills by using some kind of a filter. DerHexer 22:55, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Well, yes, I could, but I am not convinced about its need. I have reverted to the original version and move to CR with the hope to hear some more opinions Poco a poco 10:44, 12 December 2013 (UTC) Support IMO it's acceptable, Diego, when I have this problem, the only solution which I found is of decreased the clarity and the sharpening with a very small brush Christian Ferrer 18:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- I would have used the brush with a decrease of sharpening (I take note of your advice to do the same with the clarity, thanks!) but I am not really sure whether this is needed, I never was asked to do it earlier and to me it does not look bad. Poco a poco 19:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Support Of course yes!!. I added some note about blue channel --The Photographer 21:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- I fixed the WB Poco a poco 22:37, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Support
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Cccefalon 05:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Volucella bombylans (AF)-right.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Volucella bombylans female --AnneSorbes 10:34, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Excellent. --Stepro 14:10, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose posterization --A.Savin 14:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose I am not sure, if I would opt for posterization but definetly the processing is overdone with the result of vanishing details and rising noise. --Cccefalon 10:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
It seems to me that there is no these defects in the original file : https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ef/Volucella_bombylans_%28AF%29-right.jpg nicht signierter Beitrag von AnneSorbes, siehe Logbuch
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Cccefalon 05:08, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Volucella bombylans (AM)-right.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Volucella bombylans male --AnneSorbes 10:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Very good quality. --Stepro 14:10, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose posterization --A.Savin 14:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose I am not sure, if I would opt for posterization but definetly the processing is overdone with the result of vanishing details and rising noise. --Cccefalon 10:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
It seems to me that there is no these defects in the original file :https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Volucella_bombylans_%28AM%29-right.jpg nicht signierter Beitrag von AnneSorbes, siehe Logbuch
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Cccefalon 05:09, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Osterwieck_Altstadt_by_Stepro_DSC_5355.JPG
[edit]- Nomination denkmalgeschützte Häuser in der Altstadt von Osterwieck --Stepro 20:45, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline
blown sky, check the histogram --A.Savin 21:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Oppose
- weak
Oppose Nice pic, colours and sky are OK for me, however the loss of detail (see the "Nikolaistraße" sign) exceeds what I expect from a QI at only 6 megapixels. Visible CA on left side (timber framework) is quite unusual for a not-so-fast 50 mm prime. --Kreuzschnabel 05:40, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --Cccefalon 05:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Our_Lady_of_the_Rosary_of_Chiquinquirá.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Our Lady of the Rosary of Chiquinquirá --Beria 11:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Too tight a crop IMO. --Mattbuck 20:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
* Considering the place where the table is and that is covered by a glass, is almost impossible to get a decent shot with a wider frame. Can you reconsider? Beria 19:14, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Reality sometimes makes a QI impossible, this may well be one of those times. Mattbuck 21:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose As per Matt. The quality is too poor for QI. --Cccefalon 10:26, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose We evaluate the results, we can not rely on circumstantial arguments as the photo was taken. --The Photographer 15:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Cccefalon 10:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Rösrath_Germany_Old-townshall-01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Old townshall of Rösrath in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --Cccefalon 19:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
for the moment, until the correction of the slight tilt, and the slight perspective distortion at right.--Jebulon 21:55, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Oppose
Done A hint would have been good enough, rather than sending it to CR. Anyway. --Cccefalon 22:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Sorry, the picture could have been promotted "in abstentia" of yours, as it had already a "pro" vote. A sending to CR is not a personal attack, it was just in order to "freeze" the situation. Opposition removed now, of course.--Jebulon 18:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Support IMO, it's ok now, in more I think the walls of this house are not straight and if you correct more, windows will tilt to the outside --Christian Ferrer 08:08, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Cccefalon 05:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
File:People_at_Sunset_Cliffs_Natural_Park_San_Diego_2013.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Sunset Cliff Natural Park in San Diego --Tuxyso 21:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
- see notes --A.Savin 11:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Pretty, but the foreground feels slightly odd - oversharpened maybe? Mattbuck 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Support OK to me now. --A.Savin 07:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment Sharpness is just but ok IMO, but the horizon is a bit tilted on right --Christian Ferrer 08:11, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Surely? In which direction, Christian? I used the note tool here and grid tool in LR and could not see a tilt. --Tuxyso 12:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- To see it Tuxyso, I open it at full resolution, I put the top left corner of the horizon (it' easy there is a darker straight at top of the horizon) at top left of the window and I use the scrollbar and you will see on the right a very little gap, it's not big I know. --Christian Ferrer 12:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Surely? In which direction, Christian? I used the note tool here and grid tool in LR and could not see a tilt. --Tuxyso 12:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Support Tuxyso, ok for info there is a little outline around the girl in red, and the red is maybe a bit oversatured --Christian Ferrer 08:00, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --A.Savin 07:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Isla_Phi_Phi_Lay,_Tailandia,_2013-08-19,_DD_14.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Crab-eating macaque (Macaca fascicularis), Phi Phi Lay Island, Thailand --Poco a poco 10:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline
SupportGood quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose overexposed (foliage is burned out) --Christian Ferrer 17:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Neutral I don't see any overexposure (I judge by histogram and lost highlights, not by heart) --Moroder 14:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Neutral Esta imagen realmente me gusta, podria ser corregida facilmente. --The Photographer 15:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'm afraid not because of the water unless you retouch it, the composition is good --
5.86.57.200Moroder 16:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC) Comment It is not clear to me what issues do I need to address to get support, can somebody tell me? Poco a poco 12:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose It's blurred --Moroder 20:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose I agree, horrible blur and clearly overexposed (but remapped). Mattbuck 18:17, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Please, don't use expressions like "horrible", it doesn't sound respectful Poco a poco 19:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Cccefalon 22:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Christian_Lindner_(Martin_Rulsch)_1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Christian Lindner, North Rhine-Westphalian politician (FDP) and member of the Landtag of North Rhine-Westphalia. --DerHexer 11:41, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose left is unsharp --Christian Ferrer 17:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC) Does that really matter? It's not a studio photograph. DerHexer 00:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Weak
Support. f/2.8 is not the best choice in such a situation, but the eyes are sharp enough. -- Smial 22:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- zu mittig, nicht dicht genug dran, Offenblende... aber trotzdem
Support --Ralf Roletschek 16:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Support QI for me --Stepro 01:29, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Cccefalon 05:57, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Nottingham railway station MMB 31.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Nottingham station western throat. Mattbuck 08:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
OpposeImo too unsharp. DerHexer 13:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
I request a second opinion. Mattbuck 10:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC) Support sharp enough IMO --Christian Ferrer 08:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Support OK for me Pleclown 11:59, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 09:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Tuxyso 09:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)