Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 09 2019

• 
  • Nomination Ngurrungurrudjba (Yellow Water) in Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia --XRay 03:19, 7 December 2019 (UTC) Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Pyrrhocoris apterus and their nymphs on a corn. By User:Vojtasafr --janbery 20:57, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:09, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brown rock chat (Cercomela fusca) --Charlesjsharp 19:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 19:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Young female cat -- Alvesgaspar 19:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. The picture is small but the subject is large and well photographed. -- Ikan Kekek 19:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The arms of the Portuguese king in St Michael's chappel, University of Coimbra. -- Alvesgaspar 19:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 20:50, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portrait of an Inland Beared Dragon, Artis Amsterdam -- Alvesgaspar 19:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:51, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opel Olympia from 1950 at Europa Klassik Andernach 2016. -- Spurzem 18:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Little wooden statues in front of a church in Hof (Saale). --PantheraLeo1359531 15:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Krakow - Wawel from Vistula --Imehling 14:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Krakow - Wawel, Old Town from captive balloon --Imehling 14:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, however the shadow is a little bit unfortunate :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View towards Üetliberg from Felsenegg on a frosty morning above a sea of clouds --Domob 14:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 17:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dead tree with moss in Fallätsche, Zürich --Domob 14:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 17:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hohenloher Freilandmuseum, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany: The Haus Frank, a listed timber-framed farmhouse, seen via the cottage garden. --Aristeas 13:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality for me, I like the birds as detail --PantheraLeo1359531 15:35, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lichtenberg castle near Oberstenfeld, Germany; view in the winter from the west side. --Aristeas 13:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:39, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Little bell tower on the roof of a cemetery chapel in Sensbach, Oberzent, Germany. --Aristeas 13:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:39, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volkswagen T1, 1970 --Berthold Werner 13:19, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boga lake. --RockyMasum 13:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Lack of details, strong artefacts --Berthold Werner 13:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Vila Nova de Gaia from Porto, Portugal --Poco a poco 09:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Torre dos Clérigos, Porto, Portugal --Poco a poco 09:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion It is not very sharp at the top. If the focus would have been closer to the top of the tower I doubt if the bottom would still have been sharp enough --Michielverbeek 10:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Serra do Pilar, Porto, Portugal --Poco a poco 09:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 13:29, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dom Luis I bridge, Porto, Portugal --Poco a poco 09:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 10:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capela das Almas, Porto, Portugal --Poco a poco 09:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good enough quality and a really striking chapel! -- Ikan Kekek 09:59, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the catholic parish church St. Johannes Baptista in Isling --Ermell 08:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:32, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Ellersdorf in the valley of the rich Ebrach near Wingersdorf --Ermell 08:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tomb with Crucifix in the courtyard of the fortified church St. Georg in Effeltrich --Ermell 08:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main altar in the abbey church in Ebrach, erected 1778/80, painted 1650-1652 by H. G. Heyden --Ermell 08:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 09:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Larus michahellis in Farnese Gardens, Rome, Italy. --Tournasol7 07:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good focus to the bird --Michielverbeek 07:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Theaterplatz 3 in Eisenach, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 07:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door and windows of the Villa Liegnitz in Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany. --Tournasol7 07:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Salzstraße in Naumburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 07:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour of Guarda, Switzerland via Ardez and Ftan to Scuol Scuol. View of Scuol from Stradun.
    --Famberhorst 06:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour of Guarda, Switzerland via Ardez and Ftan to Scuol Scuol. View of the surrounding mountains from Stradun.
    --Famberhorst 06:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Prasüras, through the Val Trupchun to Alp Purcher in the Swiss National Park. View from Varusch over the surrounding mountains.
    --Famberhorst 06:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Vnà to Zuort. Rapids River Brancla.
    --Famberhorst 06:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing busking & nectaring of Nacaduba beroe Felder & Felder, 1865 – Opaque Six-Lineblue . Specimen belongs to sub-species Nacaduba beroe gythion Fruhstorfer, 1916 – Assam Opaque Six-Lineblue . (by Sandipoutsider) --Atudu 05:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:13, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Equus africanus somaliensis (Somali wild ass), Réserve Africaine de Sigean, France --Llez 05:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tragelaphus angasii (Lowland Nyala), female; Réserve Africaine de Sigean, France --Llez 05:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tragelaphus angasii (Lowland Nyala), male; Réserve Africaine de Sigean, France --Llez 05:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality--Famberhorst 06:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tragelaphus angasii (Lowland Nyala), male; Réserve Africaine de Sigean, France --Llez 05:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra to Ramosch. Zicht op Ramosch.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Zuort to Griosch. Suspension bridge between Val Sinestra and Zuort.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain path to the tongue of the Morteratsch glacier Zijmorene and erosion fields of the Morteratsch glacier.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Zuort to Griosch. Kurhaus Val Sinestra.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:00, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Mount Gambier (volcano), Mount Gambier, South Australia, Australia --XRay 04:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Glenelg River, Mumbannar, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern stairs to Hohe Gloriette on Gloriettenweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of St Michael and All Angels --Podzemnik 03:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
     Comment - A near-symmetrical composition with a bit of complexity - good FP candidate, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 07:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tudor House (95 Oxford Terrace), Christchurch --Podzemnik 03:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Peter Schöttel, sports director of the Austrian football federation. --Steindy 00:00, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination General view of Setubal from the mill in the Serra da Arrábida, Portugal --Poco a poco 16:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 17:28,--Horst J. Meuter 15:59, 6 December 2019 (UTC) 5 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rue Saint-Vincent in Rodez, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:24, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    There is a worm-like artefact (hair on sensor?) in the sky, else good. --Aristeas 07:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
    Done. --Tournasol7 21:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support Thank you! --Aristeas 10:43, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Étang d'Escales in PNR Pyrénées ariégeoises, commune of Auzat, Ariege, France. --Tournasol7 07:24, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Nice! There are some dust spots in the sky, I mark (some of) them with image notes and suggest to remove them. --Aristeas 07:30, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
    Done. --Tournasol7 14:29, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 10:46, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination --Rodrigo.Argenton 11:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but I miss a description -- Spurzem 21:43, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination --Rodrigo.Argenton 11:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but I miss a description of the image -- Spurzem 21:39, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dome of St. Nicholas Cathedral in St. Petersburg (Russia). --Gzen92 11:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion I think it needs a slight clockwise rotation --PantheraLeo1359531 12:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
     Done Gzen92 09:56, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
    Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Opel Commodore B GS/E --Berthold Werner 13:23, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Review Sehr ungünstiges Licht. Motorhaube, Windschutzscheibe und Dach sind zu hell. -- Spurzem 13:31, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: This is an image of a local Boat operator pulling his boat to shore after the day's work.This is an image of "African people at work". This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Africa 2017 photographic contest. By User:Gtfestusportraits --Kritzolina 07:06, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
    The horizon should be aligned --Ermell 07:19, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A Lagoon front in Festac, Lagos state, Nigeria. This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2019. By User:Johnbrainyvisuals --Kritzolina 07:00, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Review Nice photo, but sky is too purple. Please improve the white balance --Michielverbeek 07:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC).
• 
  • Nomination: Brothers from a fishing community at the shore of Lagos Lagoon set out to fish to cater for their family. This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2018. By User:Obii Okongwu --Kritzolina 07:00, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Khachkars of Noratus, old cemetery, Armenia. By User:Tanamasi --Armenak Margarian 05:24, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, quite noticable CAs in the background (and also the horizon looks weird, as if processed somehow). --Domob 14:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A pond in Christchurch Botanic Gardens, Christchurch --Podzemnik 05:06, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination View from Vista House at Crown Point. --King of Hearts 05:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality --Domob 14:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Soviet graffiti (kyrillic) in Reichstag building, Berlin. --OleNeitzel 07:24, 27 November 2019 (UTC)  Comment Please fix the vertical lines --Moroder 09:53, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Sunflowers cultivated near Villesequelande, Aude, France. --Tournasol7 08:18, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Seems overexposed. --Steindy 10:14, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
     Done, Tournasol7 11:22, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour in the vicinity of mountain village S-charl House in S-charl.
    --Famberhorst 06:22, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment please reduce the noise --Carschten 07:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
     Done.@Carschten: Noise reduced. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 16:12, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
     Comment it's better, but still noisy for this kind of photo to me. Maybe you can do something more or there's an option from someone other --Carschten 22:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
     Done. New attempt.--Famberhorst 06:13, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
     Comment better, thank you! But I'm really not sure if it's good enough for QI, because some noise isn't correctable. I hope someone else votes for this image. --Carschten 15:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
    :Thank you for your comment. To be honest. I see no more noise. But that may be due to my (old) eyes.--Famberhorst 16:41, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support I'm not convinced, but it isn't your fault if no one else wants to vote. --Carschten 23:00, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Port_Campbell_(AU),_Port_Campbell_National_Park_--_2019_--_1013.jpg

• Nomination Port Campbell National Park, Port Campbell, Victoria, Australia --XRay 03:19, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree. Too much noise and oerall not sharp. --Steindy 00:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
   I withdraw my nomination You're right. --XRay 08:24, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Seven Pandas 20:06, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Nautilus_House,_Liverpool.jpg

• Nomination Grade II listed office building on Rumford Place, Liverpool. Conferedate Consulate in the 1860s American Civil war. -- Rodhullandemu 20:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:04, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. The upper part is very noisy and not sharp. --Steindy 00:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• Weak  Support The upper (esp. upper left) part is soft, right, but overall it is IMHO still OK. --Aristeas 11:28, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination I agree it's below standard. There'a better version in the pipeline. Rodhullandemu 21:44, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Aristeas 11:28, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Austria_national_under-21_football_team_-_Teamcamp_October_2019_(74).jpg

• Nomination Bernhard Neuhold, managing director of the Austrian football federation. --Steindy 00:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion  Oppose Appalling composition. Subject is looking downwards and framing is non-optional Rodhullandemu 00:13, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
   Comment And what exactly has WHAT to do with quality? Am I responsible for where the depicted man looks and against which background he sits? You always have remarkable arguments. --Steindy 00:23, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
  Thank you very much. You don't seem to have any trouble getting your other subjects to look into the camera, set against a more uniform background and, if it matters, you have nominated three other images of this person. I'm happy if anyone else disagrees with me, but composition- and that includes background- is one of the QI criteria. Rodhullandemu 08:11, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
  I think you should read the image guidelines. These would help to avoid disruptive comments like above and like this → [[1]]. I think it's better to hear other user. --Steindy 12:25, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Composition is indeed relevant to judging a QI, but I'll allow this. It's a good composition if his team just lost. -- Ikan Kekek 07:35, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - He doesn't look very happy but that's not a matter of composition. And uniformity of background is good enough for QI in my view --Imehling 10:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support The image seems fine. Not all portraits have to be of people looking into the camera.--Peulle 11:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support This one works really good. Balanced sharpening and noise reduction, much better than several other images. --Smial 21:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support All arguments have already been mentioned. --Ralf Roletschek 14:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:04, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Bra_shirt_and_tights_-_partly_visible_worn_under_a_pant_suit_-_composite_image_-_Modelled_by_Lady_Alexi.jpg

• Nomination Composite image of bra shirt and tights - partly visible worn under a pant suit. --Tobias ToMar Maier 22:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose As a montage, it's jarring and lacks compositional integrity. It's just a bunch of maybe otherwise good pictures jammed together. Rodhullandemu 00:19, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
   Support Sorry, but “jarring” and “jammed together” are exaggerations and quite impolite. IMHO the montage is good enough for QI. Let’s hear other voices, please. --Aristeas 08:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
   Comment Composition is one of the QI criteria IIRC and that includes the way in which a montage is presented. No intention to be impolite, just say how the whole looks to me. Rodhullandemu 08:14, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
   Comment Thank you for clarification! OK, sorry, so I have misunderstood your comment (“jarring” can be (mis-)translated to German “erschütternd” which would mean “deeply shocking” – I see that this was wrong) and apologize. Well, I suggest we just hear other voices, as it seems this montage is a matter of taste ;–). No offence and best regards, --Aristeas 08:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yes, I agree; the way these images were put toghether doesn't quite work. Individually, the images might be fine.--Peulle 11:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:03, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Street_market_in_Marsaxlokk_05.jpg

• Nomination Street market in Marsaxlokk - salmon --Kritzolina 21:34, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
• Decline  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree. While this camera can take technicaly great pictures, this is not one of them. --Tobias ToMar Maier 22:55, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Somewhat random composition, but good enough as a QI. --Smial 10:29, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image is not sharp IMO, and it looks like a random composition --Cvmontuy 13:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support No beautiful motive but a good image -- Spurzem 16:33, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Not a random composition, but in my opinion, not sharp enough. And it's clear that Ralf Roletschek voted for and Tobias ToMar Maier voted against, so I'm recording that. -- Ikan Kekek 20:06, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp, JPG artifacts, low quality. --Magnus (talk) 10:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:02, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Hamburger-kunsthalle-alter-treppenaufgang.jpg

• Nomination Alter Treppenaufgang in der Hamburger Kunsthalle. By User:Daniela Kloth --Ralf Roletschek 19:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:47, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose I don't agree, not sharp enough, f-value too low --Michielverbeek 20:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
   Info its a photo from 2008, with this camera ISO more than 400 have big noise. --Ralf Roletschek 21:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose Not ISO, focus. Too much lacking in sharpness, even for 2008 Rodhullandemu 00:23, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. And I don't see what's gained by nominating old photos that are not very good, but of course anyone can nominate any photo they like. -- Ikan Kekek 20:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:02, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Tonga_nuku_fukave.jpg

• Nomination Nuku & Fukave Island, Tonga --Arne mueseler 20:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
  Dust spots to remove. --Steindy 23:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Chenspec 21:55, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree. There are some dust spots to remove. --Steindy 10:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - The dust spots aren't that large and not so bad, but Arne, please remove them, and then I'll happily support. -- Ikan Kekek 07:39, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:01, 8 December 2019 (UTC)