Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 08 2020
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Hawthorn at the dune landscape, Borkum, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:24, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grebhan's Pad, Borkum, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:24, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Illuminated edges of paper (abstract photography) --XRay 04:24, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bandstand on the promenade, Borkum, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:24, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mushrooms (Pholiota) in the game reserve in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:24, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Light signal on Drautalbahn II in Sallach, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fingerposts on Sallacher Strasse #34 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Light signal on Drautalbahn II in Sallach, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fingerposts on Sallacher Strasse #34 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Pauer on Gartenweg #31 in Sallach, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue in Mesita C, San Agustín Archaeological Park, Colombia --Bgag 00:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue in Mesita C, San Agustín Archaeological Park, Colombia --Bgag 00:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue in Mesita C, San Agustín Archaeological Park, Colombia --Bgag 00:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of a frog in San Agustín Archaeological Park, Colombia --Bgag 00:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fuente Ceremonial de Lavapatas, San Agustín Archaeological Park, Colombia --Bgag 00:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stockstadt (Main), Maingasse 15 --KaiBorgeest 23:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 00:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Redtail catfish in the aquarium -- George Chernilevsky 20:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 00:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eastern barn owl. --Fitindia 19:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Badly overprocessed, all details are lost, solid artifacts jpg --George Chernilevsky 22:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial in Tübingen --Dktue 16:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Looks good. -- Liberaler Humanist 18:38, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Convertible 2016 --DeFacto 16:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Convertible 2016 --DeFacto 16:26, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window in an Ohio church depicting Saint Michael. --Nheyob 15:39, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:29, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The masonry of the vault ceiling. Bath of the Khan's citadel "Naryn-Kala", Derbent, Dagestan --Александр Байдуков 15:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not sharp enough, overexposed, CAs. --Tournasol7 15:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grotto of Lourdes in Wettolsheim (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 13:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument in Bennwihr (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 13:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amber Fort, Jaipur, India --Poco a poco 13:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fitindia 19:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building in Pink City, Jaipur, India --Poco a poco 13:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion I think it's a QI, though the towers could be sharper and the sky could be less noisy, but please identify the building as the Jama Masjid and see if it has its own category. -- Ikan Kekek 03:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Małgorzata Handzlik. By User:Foto-AG Gymnasium Melle --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 14:44, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jürgen Klute. By User:Foto-AG Gymnasium Melle --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Olga Sehnalová. By User:Foto-AG Gymnasium Melle --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Canonballs at a niche in Vaxholm Castle --Liberaler Humanist 10:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, I hope, they aren't in use anymore :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Office building of the «Revtrud» plant. Former state wine warehouse. --Саня Новиков 09:39, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Looks good. -- Liberaler Humanist 12:49, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Monschau (Germany). --Palauenc05 09:14, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 09:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 3 rue Paul-Foussat in Uzes, Gard, France. --Tournasol7 07:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:16, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Capital on the facade of the Hôtel Presbytere de la cathédrale in Nîmes, Gard, France. --Tournasol7 07:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:16, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Lucas Cranach Tower in northwest direction. --Ermell 07:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Puddle on the hiking trail in Schwalbach Valley between Schirradorf and Azendorf --Ermell 07:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:45, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Quarry near Neubrunn in the district of Haßberge --Ermell 07:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:45, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heroldsmühle near Heiligenstadt in Upper Franconia --Ermell 07:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:57, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Escherndorf seen from the Vogelsburg --Ermell 07:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oreocereus celsianus, Christchurch Botanic Gardens --Podzemnik 05:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carpobrotus edulis, South New Brighton Beach --Podzemnik 05:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Path on dunes on the South New Brighton Beach --Podzemnik 05:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve Petgatten De Feanhoop. Location: "Skriuwersarke". View of petgat.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:38, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Nature reserve Petgatten De Feanhoop. Location: "Skriuwersarke". View of petgat.
-
- Nomination Water weir in the Linde. Location, Beekdal Linde near the Bekhofplas. Water management of the Linde.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:38, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Water weir in the Linde. Location, Beekdal Linde near the Bekhofplas. Water management of the Linde.
-
- Nomination Plaster model for head of a Saint (Saint Peter?) from the the atelier of the sculptor Ludwig Moroder AD 1900 in the House Lenert in Urtijëi. --Moroder 04:52, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Promotion--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaster model for head of a Saint. --Moroder 04:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Promotion--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Birth house of Johann Georg August Wirth in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 18:35, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:02, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination University Hall at The Ohio State University before an approaching storm. Photo taken from an adjacent building. --Nheyob 16:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I would recommend a slight ccw rotation. --PantheraLeo1359531 19:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
rotated it a little. --Nheyob 14:23, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you :) --PantheraLeo1359531 22:44, 5 December 2020 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination University Hall at The Ohio State University before an approaching storm. Photo taken from an adjacent building. --Nheyob 16:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building under renovation in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 10:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Colegio San Lorenzo in Cienfuegos in Cuba, 2014. --Mosbatho 22:00, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Interesting but it looks a but underexposed --Podzemnik 01:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination--Mosbatho 17:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Design elements of Culture House "Znamya Truda", Tambov, Russia --Саня Новиков 19:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Taxis in Tel Aviv-Yafo by Eurovaran --Andrew J.Kurbiko 15:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Courtyard of Institut de France (by Moonik) --Sebring12Hrs 14:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Geranium robertianum in Onet l'Église, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 14:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Copperplate print (18th century) of archbishops of Trier and Cologne. --Palauenc05 11:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Dinosaur in Europa-Park in Rust (Allemagne). --Gzen92 08:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Head of a sheep in Europa-Park in Rust (Allemagne). --Gzen92 08:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mana Motuhake, Christchurch --Podzemnik 10:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Review
The red wood looks very grainy. Is it a processing issue? KaiBorgeest 22:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Electricity and water charging station in Saverne (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Left side is leaning out. --Tournasol7 08:26, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Done Thanks, Gzen92 08:14, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 13:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Heterochromia_dog,_Struga.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Heterochromia dog --Liridon 08:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose The eyes are sharp but the focus should have been closer to the camera to include the snout, the f-numer is too small (and probably the shutter speed to high) --Poco a poco 12:31, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- Support I disagree. Yes, the DoF could be a bit wider, but the whiskers are still sharp enough to me, to consider this a QI. --MB-one 11:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Support As the description and focus of this image are both centred on the eyes of the dog I concur with MB-one on QI while not disagreeing with the assessment of Poco a poco!:) --Scotch Mist 14:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose nose not in focus. Charlesjsharp 15:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per others - maybe not a common motif, but dogs are normally considered relatively easy to photograph. However,it could be a good VI, depending on its competition. -- Ikan Kekek 21:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)- Support Very small DOF. But the purpose of the photo is to explain heterochromia (maybe for encyclopedic use). And heterochromia is perfectly explained by two sharp eyes.--KaiBorgeest 22:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Support Per KaiBorgeest: Focusing on the eyes only could even put more emphasis on the phenomenon --Moroder 04:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment You guys have a good point. I've crossed out my opposing vote. -- Ikan Kekek 04:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Support Seven Pandas 20:29, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 23:28, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Barclay de Tolly Mausoleum 38.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Barclay de Tolly Mausoleum in Estonia Scotch Mist 06:12, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I am sorry. But the dark tones are so dark that recent parts of the monuement are close to black. --Augustgeyler 12:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Augustgeyler: Understand your opinion but it puzzles my why you repeatedly insist on opposing the views of images promoted by others, which generally I find disrespectful unless a major fault or blemishes, such as dust spots, have been overlooked, while many images have not been reviewed at all??? --Scotch Mist 16:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I expected this response from you. That's why I first thought about not voting on this. But as I told you before: It has nothing to do with being not respectful when following the guidelines of consensual review in case of different opinions. --Augustgeyler 17:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment With respect, you did not answer my question! --Scotch Mist 19:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Support OK with me, but disagreeing with a vote to promote is in no way per se rude. If it were, a single vote would amount to an automatic promotion. -- Ikan Kekek 07:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Ikan Kekek: Thank you for your review and I agree with your comment as well as also understanding the technical criticism behind the opposing view, but I find it 'puzzling' when support of others for images I have nominated is persistently opposed while many more images of myself and others remain un-reviewed? It is appreciated that time is a constraint for all of us but I would prefer not to spend mine repeatedly fighting the same 'battles' on matters that many would consider more to do with 'individual style' than 'essential technical standards'. While in addition to object\scene details I aim for my photographs to capture the broad range of natural colours and contrasts as seen around us, I fully understand others may prefer to focus their photographic attention on achieving what they consider to be more 'technically perfect' results (I think most who contribute in this forum are content to accept this situation, irrespective of their personal views, while generally endeavouring to achieve their own 'good compromises'). QI provides good guidance in this process but IMHO should not be viewed so rigorously that every photographer of a particular object or scene produces an image that looks much the same because it has been created with identical camera settings and under ideal lighting conditions to sharply reveal every detail, no matter how relatively insignificant, in the scope of the image!:) --SM1 (talk) 11:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I surely understand the frustration. If I had to guess, I think that at least some of the time, when photos aren't reviewed it's because people who are looking at them can't decide whether to promote or decline them. -- Ikan Kekek 21:36, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Moroder 04:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. Would improve if the deep shadows are lightened a bit. --Tagooty 01:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 15:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)