Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 08 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Minsk. Church of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul (2016).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Church of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul. Minsk, Belarus --Bestalex 10:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Looks OK. --Peulle 10:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now: please correct the tilt (church towers are leaning to the left) and chromatic aberrations. --A.Savin 15:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
    • I corrected the tilt slightly. Where are CA? I have removed it, anyway, I tried do that. --Bestalex 13:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
      • Thanks, it's somewhat OK to go now.  Neutral --A.Savin 17:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - This one really does need to be perspective-corrected. The combination of the fence going up and the towers going down makes no sense to me from any standpoint. -- Ikan Kekek 08:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The perspective doesn't bother that much but the sky is overexposed and the upper part of the buildibg is too soft. -- Alvesgaspar 23:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 15:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Eskimo_Callboy_–_Elbriot_2015_10.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Eskimo Callboy beim Elbriot 2015. By User:Huhu Uet --Achim Raschka 05:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Review
  • {{Comment}} and {{o}} It is completely inappropriate to threaten potential users with immediate legal action. Just because it is a community-sponsored project, you should use CC-BY-SA-4.0 here. Thanks for your kind understanding, Wikipedia should be and remain as a friendly place! --Hubertl 10:16, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Support now, thanks for changing the Template, Achim Raschka and Huhu Uet! --Hubertl 15:51, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Es ist unangebracht, hier Lizenzpolitik zu betreiben --Ralf Roletschek 10:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Hand and guitar are very unsharp at full size, hand is cut off. Not a QI in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 10:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Ikan Kekek.--Peulle 13:05, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good sharpness and composition. Situation well captured. Perhaps very slight overexposure. -- Smial 15:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Great concert shot. Yann 00:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good portrait.--Ermell 21:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm thinking, but see notes: Unacceptable spot or stain (see left area of the picture). Dust spot. Poor dof, CAs, chromatic noise, overexpossed areas. Sorry: Why is it QI?: Sharpness of a litle area?, hard to take?, size? But good or very good composition--Lmbuga 17:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too many technical flaws. The worst are probably the overexposed face and the cropped hand. Alvesgaspar 23:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 23:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose chromatic aberration and background noise. It could be fixed --The Photographer 13:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 04:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)