Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 07 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Branta_canadensis_Redwood_Shores_May_2011_007.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Family of Canada geese. --King of Hearts 05:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Nice but the head of the mother goose is hardly to see. The background is too dark. -- Spurzem 18:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree with Spurzem. --El Grafo 11:04, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment No support, at least one oppose, why is this picture in CR?--Jebulon 18:45, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Edificios_en_Camariñas_122.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Buildings in Camariñas, Galicia (Spain) -122 --Lmbuga 00:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Info Comments deleted, see the history if needed. Ram-Man 18:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    •  Support Excellent quality. (My previous comments were removed as they were part of the abuse discussion) Ram-Man 03:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ram-Man --Livioandronico2013 11:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Nothing to complain. --Cccefalon 06:28, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Jebulon 18:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 18:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Acceso_ó_porto_deportivo_para_embarcacións._Camariñas_123.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Access to the marina for boats, Camariñas, Galicia (Spain) -123 --Lmbuga 00:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Info Comments deleted, see the history if needed. Ram-Man 18:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Ram-Man 03:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ram-Man --Livioandronico2013 11:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Cccefalon 06:31, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Jebulon 18:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 18:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Embarcacións_no_porto_de_Camariñas_124.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Boats in the port of Camariñas, Galicia (Spain)-124 --Lmbuga 00:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Info Comments deleted, see the history if needed. Ram-Man 18:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Ram-Man 03:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ram-Man--Livioandronico2013 11:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:29, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Jebulon 18:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 18:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria vs. Russia 20141115 (084).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Hinterseer, Lindner, Sabitzer and Weimann (from left to right) are jubilant about the victory of Austria against Russia. --Steindy 22:40, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality, I think. --Brateevsky 15:27, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I no,unsharp especially on left --Livioandronico2013 16:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's a good picture, but not QI IMO. Too tight at left. Noisy. Dark clothes of the left have chromatic noise. Poor DOF IMO (some faces are not sharp enough)--Lmbuga 18:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • I'd be inclined to support it if the CA (noticable in thumbnail) were fixed, and if the guy on the left were cropped out as he's not quite as crisp as the other three. Mattbuck 21:19, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info Abuse comments have been removed and existing ones modified accordingly. See page history if you need them. Ram-Man 17:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Livioandronico2013 17:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria vs. Russia 20141115 (070).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Martin Harnik (Austria, left) in duel with Dmitriy Kombarov (Russia). --Steindy 22:53, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 08:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose For me unsharp. --Livioandronico2013 16:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Sure, the background isn't sharp, but the players are. Jakec 00:26, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Nice and good composition, perhaps FP, but too unsharp and noisy IMO, not QI IMO. Too tight at top IMO (hand)--Lmbuga 18:56, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info Comments deleted, see the history if needed. Ram-Man 18:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unsharp, noisy. Sorry not QI. --P e z i 21:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Livioandronico2013 17:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria vs. Russia 20141115 (061).jpg

[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Livioandronico2013 17:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria vs. Russia 20141115 (064).jpg

[edit]

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 17:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria vs. Russia 20141115 (067).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Martin Harnik, player of the Austria national football team. --Steindy 23:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose - Not sharp. --Mattbuck 19:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
    Mattbuck, The player who is nominated is sharp. I will remember you at your train-photos. --Steindy 01:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    That counts as sharp the same way that children's safety scissors do. Mattbuck 20:18, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

 Oppose Per Matt --Livioandronico2013 09:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 17:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria vs. Russia 20141115 (057).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rubin Okotie (Austria, right) by a shot, which was helt by keeper Igor Akinfeev in the match Ausria vs. Russia. --Steindy 01:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose - There's too little in focus. --Mattbuck 18:59, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
    Mattbuck, The players who are nominated are sharp. --Steindy 01:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    By the way: Do they know what the depth of field at aperture 2.8? --Steindy 14:03, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    Steindy, I do not deny that some of the players are in focus, but most of the picture is not in focus, and the eye is drawn to the out of focus areas. Bad composition. Mattbuck 15:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    Dear @Mattbuck: ! There are other players in the picture, if the right player shoots at goal and to the left is the goalkeeper. Am I to other players from the photo retouch? If'll think about the future, nor to ask here Photos for discussion on basic knowledge of the sport is missing. --Steindy 17:34, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    @Steindy: , I may not be the world's greatest authority on football, and nor would I ever wish to be, but that does not render me incapable of telling whether an image is QI or not. I see the action in the middle - this draws the eye - and that action is completely out of focus. I am aware that the out of focus action is a recognised technique, but in such circumstances the main purpose of the photo is in focus. If all the action besides the two on the right were cropped out then it might have a chance, but the "two small points of focus on either side of a vast expanse of blur" technique will never pass QI. Mattbuck 20:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Matt --Livioandronico2013 09:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Matt. Ram-Man 02:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info Comments aggressively pruned and deleted, see the history if needed. Ram-Man 18:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 17:04, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:FordFocusExe.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Ford Focus parked in Tandil, Argentina --Ezarate 19:57, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Very tilted. No QI for me. -- Spurzem 23:04, 30 November 2014 (UTC) I tried to fix it Ezarate 23:21, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not fixed, tilted. Also, the front of the car is not sharp enough IMO (see the wheel). Visible Cyan CAs. I don't like and I don't understand the composition. It seems a random picture, sorry: Not QI for me--Lmbuga 20:40, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

 Oppose Sorry but per Spurzem and Lmbuga--Livioandronico2013 11:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 17:03, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2013-11-01_Triton_und_Nymphe-Volksgarten_Viktor_Tilgner_6025.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Triton und Nymphe fountain by Viktor Tilgner at Volksgarten. --Hubertl 23:08, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Very good. --Steindy 01:36, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very good? Subject blurred, bird out of focus -- Alvesgaspar 12:42, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Alvesgaspar. Breast is sharp, face is not. Plus pixelisation around the bird’s feet, maybe poor post-processing. --Kreuzschnabel 19:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, poor quality. Shameful proposal IMO. Blurred, as Alvesgaspar--Lmbuga 20:46, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 17:01, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2013-11-01_Triton_und_Nymphe-Volksgarten_Viktor_Tilgner_6041.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Triton und Nymphe fountain by Viktor Tilgner at Volksgarten. --Hubertl 23:08, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Nice.--Famberhorst 05:48, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark and blurred, poor framing -- Alvesgaspar 12:42, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark and blurred, poor framing. As Alvesgaspar --Lmbuga 20:49, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 17:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Будівля вокзалу Кривий Ріг-Головний 02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination train station, Kryvyi Rih city, Ukraine by User:WDKeeper --User:Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:22, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support QI --Bahnfrend 03:35, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Stitching error, magenta CA, perspective issues. Not a QI. @Bahnfrend: refrain from a promotion-reflex only because there is a rail track. Please do a carefully review according to the image guidelines. --Cccefalon 20:09, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

 Comment I didn't notice the stitching errors or CA, and I like the perspective. If the stitching and CA were corrected, it would still be a QI for me. --Bahnfrend 10:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
 Oppose Sorry Per Cccefalon--Livioandronico2013 20:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 16:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria vs. Russia 20141115 (071).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Martin Harnik (Austria, right) in duel with Dmitriy Kombarov (Russia). --Steindy 22:53, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose The Russian is out of focus (on purpose), the Austrian is not sharp enough (not on purpose). Good composition anyway--Jebulon 14:28, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Jebulon, it is the characteristic of the football game, that there are attackers and defenders. So if there is a distance of five to eight meters between these two players, then it is possible that with a 400 mm lens both players are in focus? The photo should accurately convey this distance, which is why the left player has not been cut away. --Steindy 00:17, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Steindy, thanks for the lesson of football, I appreciate. Aber ich mag lieber rugby, so I'm ready to teach you the rules (for more subtle than football rules) if you want. There are attackers and defenders too, but all the team is involved in attack or defence, it depends of the moment of the game, like in handball, you see ? Seriously, I agree my assessment lacks of "sharpness", like your image: forget all, just consider that Harnik is unsharp.--Jebulon 20:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Jebulon --Livioandronico2013 16:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Jebulon. @Steindy: , QI is not about extenuating circumstances. I don't care if you had to take a photo while walking a tightrope above molten lava - if the photo you got while doing that isn't sufficiently sharp it will not be QI. Stadia are hard to photograph in because, while well-lit, they are still dark by comparison to the world during the day. Very few sports photos at night will be QI, simply on the grounds of the high ISO required to get the short exposure means a lack of fine detail. Mattbuck 08:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 16:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Charleroi_-_rue_Tumelaire_91_-_rosace_du_tramway_électrique.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Charleroi (Belgium) - support for electric tram alimentation --Jmh2o 11:11, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Very weak  Support Good quality. DoF could be better. --XRay 10:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I need a discussion. It is an excellent document for an interesting object, but the focus could be discussed, and the picture needs a rotation cw IMO (verticality)--Jebulon 14:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weak  Oppose. Interesting object and not too badly shot, but DoF is too shallow, altogether a bit soft for its size, and the rotation issue mentioned by Jebulon. I tried to fix the perspective but the loss on the image is too huge, it needs about 3 degrees rotation plus keystone correction. Pity. --Kreuzschnabel 09:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 16:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.07.11.-10-Eilenburg Hainichen--Grosser Blaupfeil-Maennchen.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Großer Blaupfeil - Orthetrum cancellatum, Männchen (male) --Hockei 17:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment May it's better with another crop. But IMO DoF missing and a disturbing light spot in the middle.--XRay 10:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Fixed Changed crop and light spot removed. DOF is good IMO. --Hockei 19:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support It's better but I would choose another crop (less at the top).--XRay 06:46, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thank you. I changed the crop again. It seems to be better for me as well. --Hockei (talk) 18:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Livioandronico2013 16:38, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but no. This is well below the QI bar for insects. Almost nothing in the subject is sharp. Alvesgaspar 16:30, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strongly per Alvesgaspar. Please compare with similar QI, we are far from the minimum quality, IMO.--Jebulon 18:34, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Livioandronico2013 16:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria vs. Russia 20141115 (087).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Marc Janko, player of the Austrian national football Team. --Steindy 23:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Sorry, too tight at top, at bottom and at left (especially on that side). I don't like the white balance and the detail is not very good IMO--Lmbuga 00:42, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
    Other votes please. --Steindy 01:24, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support ok in splite of the left crop (cut hand) --Christian Ferrer 09:43, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- Too soft, too tight crop. Valuable image but not an example of quality. Alvesgaspar 11:13, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Alvesgaspar. And that cropped finger...--Jebulon 13:51, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Alvesgaspar --Livioandronico2013 15:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 Comment Do you also have your own opinion or are you talking about getting another by? --Steindy 19:38, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Maybe I should answer like Christian Ferrer,anyway Alvesgaspar said that i think. Why i must repeat??? --Livioandronico2013 20:38, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Ich versteh dich mal wieder nicht. Es ist hier doch vollkommen üblich, sich dem Review eines anderen anzuschließen, wenn man dessen Urteil über das Bild teilt. Das heißt doch nicht, daß man keine eigene Meinung hätte! Und grundsätzlich: Was versprichst du dir davon, auf Kontras trotzig zu reagieren? Meinst du, dann ändern diejenigen ihre Meinung über dein Bild ins Positive? Wenn nicht, was soll es dann? Nimm es doch als ehrliche Rückmeldung. Ich für mich sehe es einfach so: Wenn eines meiner Bilder auf Widerspruch stößt, ist es halt nicht gut genug, und fertig. --Kreuzschnabel 20:05, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 16:52, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria vs. Russia 20141115 (088).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Marc Janko, player of the (Austrian national football Team. --Steindy 23:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Good quality. Enough for QI --Hubertl 00:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry, the front is overexposed (see note), too much noise and poor detail to be QI IMO. Yellowish IMO. Too tight at top IMO--Lmbuga 00:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
    Yes and he has a scrape grass on his eye and on the shirt. By the way: have you ever made football photos with floodlight? I think not, because then you'd have to know that reflected the light on the sweaty body. --Steindy 01:24, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose burned out area on the face --Christian Ferrer 09:39, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too blurred for QI -- Alvesgaspar 11:11, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Alvesgaspar --Livioandronico2013 15:54, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 Comment Do you also have your own opinion or are you talking about getting another by? --Steindy 19:40, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Maybe I should answer like Christian Ferrer,anyway Alvesgaspar said that i think. Why i must repeat??? --Livioandronico2013 20:38, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Alvesgaspar.--Jebulon 20:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  • weak  Support – WB is OK for me, the blown forehead inaviodable (lesser exposure would make his hair drown in black; the image is properly exposed, the contrast was just too high), and the crop is okay. Minor sharpness flaws can be excused on this kind of shots. --Kreuzschnabel 20:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 16:51, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria vs. Russia 20141115 (090).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Marc Janko (Austria, left) folowed by Vasiliy Berezutskiy (Russia). --Steindy 23:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Sorry, strong noise, unbalanced picture, chromatic noise--Lmbuga 00:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
    Other votes please. --Steindy 01:24, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose tilted, not fixable without a crop. --Christian Ferrer 09:40, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
     Neutral indeed I looked at the horizontal, but it's certainly not a good reference. --Christian Ferrer 19:17, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't see any tilt, I don't see chromatic noise. The background is really noisy (correctible), and the austrian player is a bit out of focus, despite the downsampling (very small at full size). But the light and the composition are for me excellent, The two players looking together in the same direction, with a similar attitude, this makes me support this one.--Jebulon 13:48, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Lmbuga --Livioandronico2013 15:55, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 Comment Do you also have your own opinion or are you talking about getting another by? --Steindy 19:42, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Maybe I should answer like Christian Ferrer,anyway Lmbuga said that i think. Why i must repeat??? --Livioandronico2013 20:39, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment My vote was in 01:24, 29 November 2014. (@Jebulon), in the new version uploaded at 05:00, 30 November 2014, I don't see chromatic noise. The new version has not been properly announced: When the author announce the new version, maybe I decide to change my vote. Perhaps!!?--Lmbuga 14:46, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Livioandronico2013 16:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)