Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 31 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:2016-07-27_Seagull_in_Zandvoort_aan_Zee_(02)_(freddy2001).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A seagull (Larus argentatus) in the dunes of Zandvoort aan Zee. --Freddy2001 20:24, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Ooops, change to  Oppose per below. I didn't realize that the versions were identical, thanks for pointing that out. W.carter 20:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't think it is sharp enough. Charlesjsharp 22:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Please change to  Oppose. I didn't check that photo is already a Q1one --Michielverbeek 05:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Somewhat low DOF, but good enough. Nice, soft lighting so there are no hard shadows. -- Smial 08:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This photo is an alternative version of File:2016-07-27 Seagull in Zandvoort aan Zee (freddy2001).jpg, which is already QI. --A.Savin 06:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as A.Savin. It´s a identical copy, just a different processing. --Hubertl 06:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per above. Jkadavoor 06:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 07:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Archibasis oscillans-Kadavoor-2016-07-03-004.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Archibasis oscillans mating --Jkadavoor 03:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:30, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  • {{o}} I don't think conditions made it is possible to get a QI, even using flash.  Comment no signature, therefore striked. --Hubertl 05:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose insufficient quality. Charlesjsharp 07:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support ok for me --Christian Ferrer 18:23, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 18:19, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Orthetrum sabina 09229.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Orthetrum sabina --Vengolis 02:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 02:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  OpposeAbdomen not in focus and quite dark. Charlesjsharp 22:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support For me QI --Rjcastillo 17:33, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 18:20, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Lestes elatus 1442.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Lestes elatus --Vengolis 02:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:32, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not at all sharp. Charlesjsharp 22:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough. Jkadavoor 05:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 07:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Euphaea dispar - Davidraju IMG 5408.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Euphaea dispar by Davidvraju --Jkadavoor 03:47, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:50, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  OpposeNot sure why you are nominating this user's images Jee. They don't appear QI to me. Charlesjsharp 23:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support This one looks fine to me Poco a poco 09:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good image. QI. --Rjcastillo 17:39, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:14, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 18:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)