Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 29 2020
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Leijepolder pumping station. Wetterskip Fryslân in Súdwest-Fryslân.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Leijepolder pumping station. Wetterskip Fryslân in Súdwest-Fryslân.
-
- Nomination Russisch-orthodox klooster (Hemelum) Wooden cross on the side wall.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Russisch-orthodox klooster (Hemelum) Wooden cross on the side wall.
-
- Nomination Samoa Beach on the ocean side of the Samoa Peninsula near Eureka, California --Frank Schulenburg 03:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arcades at Lambertikirchplatz and at Alten Steinweg in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lambertikirchplatz 3 and 4, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bispinghof 3 (former Landesversicherungsanstalt),Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Penitence cross on the bridge over the Aa at Bispinghof in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oriel window at the house “Spiekerhof 37”, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mary`s church on Benediktinerplatz, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of Mary`s church on Benediktinerplatz, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the former Society of Jesus College on Karfreitstrasse #14, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western view of Landhaus on Landhaushof #1, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
The perspective distorsions are quite severe at the bottom (ground floor not horizontal). Maybe tricky to fix --Basile Morin 03:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Done @Basile Morin: Thanks for your review. I tried to fix the horizontals of the building. —- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sole of foot of a two week old Asian infant on a white bed sheet, focus stacked image obtained from 7 pictures. Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 01:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sole of foot of a two week old Asian infant on a white bed sheet, focus stacked image obtained from 6 pictures. Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 01:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Luther Memorial, University of Mary Hardin-Baylor, Belton, Texas, U.S. By User:Nv8200pa --Another Believer 23:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, too unsharp, CAs, resolution too small. --XRay 04:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Belton Woman's Commonwealth historical marker, Belton, Texas, U.S. By User:Nv8200pa --Another Believer 23:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, too unsharp, CAs, resolution too small. --XRay 04:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dell Seton Medical Center, University of Texas in Austin, U.S. By User:Nv8200pa --Another Believer 23:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, too unsharp, CAs, perspective issues, resolution too small. --XRay 04:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clark Center, Stanford. --King of Hearts 23:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clark Center, Stanford. --King of Hearts 23:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross in Reuth (Eifel). --Palauenc05 17:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 20:02, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An S8 Stock Train at Hillingdon Tube Station. --Vincent60030 16:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 18:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Central Martyrs Monument of Chittagong University,Bangladesh. --Syed07 16:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose the far right part of the object is missing --Augustgeyler 17:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Helipad in the Nilgiri hill, Bandarban. --Syed07 16:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose not so sharp, compsition not that good due to that large room for sky --Augustgeyler 17:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Germany, Lieser, Weingut Schloss Lieser --Berthold Werner 13:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vincent60030 17:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cloister of Monastère Saint-Paul-de-Mausole --Velvet 13:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Collegium Maius (Kraków). By User:Jar.ciurus --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support null --Augustgeyler 07:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Collegium Maius (Kraków). By User:Jar.ciurus --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support very impressive composition --Augustgeyler 07:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Collegium Minus. By User:Jar.ciurus --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support The lights are making it a real quality picture --Augustgeyler 07:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stradomska Street in Kraków. By User:Jar.ciurus --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moses Montefiore Windmill at night. By User:Eranfel --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support well aranged composition --Augustgeyler 07:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old artillery tools to operate a cannon, from top to down: scoop, priming iron, brush, botefeux?, rammer, Fort of São Brás, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 06:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaza Alta, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 06:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Very good quality. --Ermell 12:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ascension to Aksla, Ålesund, Norway --Poco a poco 06:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:18, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palmas Gate, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 06:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Bien centrée, symétrique, le grain est fin, le contraste est agréable, et bon clair-obscur devant la porte. Le ciel n'est pas sur-saturé. --Elryck 06:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Turk's cap lily (Lilium martagon) --Uoaei1 06:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support there is existing a better version of it, but this is a quality picture, too --Augustgeyler 07:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stucco ceiling of the catholic parish church St. Johannes Baptista in Uetzing in the district of Lichtenfels --Ermell 06:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Organ loft of the catholic parish church St. Johannes Baptista in Uetzing in the district of Lichtenfels --Ermell 06:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sundial at the protestant church in Igensdorf in the district of Forchheim --Ermell 06:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gravestone in the church St. Michael Kirchahorn --Ermell 06:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ambigram Velib / Gitan (Velib / Gitanos in French). 180° rotational symmetry. Animated logo (74 frames). The design is derived from the original logo, with the same colors and visual appearance. It's a humorous parody work. Vélib' is a large-scale public bicycle sharing system in Paris, France, and the Romani people sometimes share a traditional nomadic mode of life. That makes sense with the bicycles. --Basile Morin 04:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ambigram Jihad / Devil. 180° rotational symmetry. Animated logo (73 frames), red letters on black background, and black letters on red background. --Basile Morin 04:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ambigram Ambiguity, rotational symmetry of 180 degrees. Animated logo (38 frames), black on white background. --Basile Morin 04:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination HaShachar Tower (Givatayim). By User:Ynhockey --Andrew J.Kurbiko 20:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Giralda of Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 19:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beadlet anemone (Actinia equina), Setúbal, Portugal --Poco a poco 19:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palmas Bridge, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 19:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Табличка объекта исторического и культурного наследия. Коломенское, Москва. Sign of a historical and cultural heritage site --Ulaisaeva 17:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. could be taken in a little better angle. but its a quality one --Augustgeyler 07:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination cemetery chapel at Ostfriedhof in Leipzig shortly after a summer rain --Augustgeyler 10:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose a mess on the tree leaves, seems to be moved --Ezarate 16:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fast reife Äpfel im eigenem Hausgarten, Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland. --Fischer.H 17:08, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Here the variety would be important --Ermell 21:26, 23 August 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 11:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
the apples ar not as sharp as they should be --Augustgeyler 21:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 07:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Categorisation and description wrong. --Ermell 12:32, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thistles, flowers, and plants in front of a sunset. --NowIsntItTime 19:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Too much light, overshadowing the flowers --Vincent60030 17:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Clypeaster reticulatus. FredD 12:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Church of the Assumption of Niévroz in Ain department, France. --Chabe01 10:26, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Review Please correct the verticals. --Palauenc05 14:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Gabi Gazit. By User:Nitzan Hafner --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:23, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sunrise over Shikotan, Russia. By Kirill.uyutnov --Atsirlin 06:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Review
Nice but it needs a vertical perspective correction to get rid of the distortion on both sides --Poco a poco 06:15, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:Paulo Cattelan --Rodrigo.Argenton 01:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Review
A lot of noise ... Please try to fix it. --XRay 05:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-AMG S 63 Coupé at IAA 2017, Frankfurt --MB-one 20:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Review Please no offense. But the picture reminds me a bit of my attempt to photograph a black cat in the dark basement without light. -- Spurzem 08:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
No offense taken. The lighting situation has been very difficult indeed. In my eyes, the result is satisfactory. But I do respect differing opinions. --MB-one 16:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Lahm_b_Lichtenfels_Kruzifix-20200809-RM-154941.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Crucifix with war memorial in Lahm near Lichtenfels --Ermell 06:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose technically ok, but the background is disturbing --Augustgeyler 07:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Support The background is a little bit disturbing, may be f/5.6 would be a solution. But IMO it is QI. --XRay 08:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Capteur_de_glycémie_pour_personnes_diabétiques.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Blood sugat tester--Celeda 05:04, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Its telling more about the capet than the objects --Augustgeyler 09:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't understand your sentence. According to my dictionary "capet" is not an English word? For Augustgeyler, cool to answer me, I should have guessed! It's not a carpet but a towel--Celeda 07:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry: I meant „carpet“.--Augustgeyler 17:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 05:46, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Peulle 07:40, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Burwood_war_memorial,_Christchurch,_Canterbury,_New_Zealand_02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Burwood war memorial, Christchurch, Canterbury --Podzemnik 04:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --XRay 06:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose object in the right corner is disturbing --Augustgeyler 11:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I agree on this one. That post really spoils the look of an otherwise good image.--Peulle 07:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Minor composition issue. Traffic signs, street markings also disturb... Technically ok. --Smial 12:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support QI for me. --Ermell 12:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Burwood_war_memorial,_Christchurch,_Canterbury,_New_Zealand_04.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Burwood war memorial, Christchurch, Canterbury --Podzemnik 04:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. May be a touch too warm. --XRay 06:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose background is not good, there is also some distortion --Augustgeyler 11:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Question Where and what kind of distortion? I would tend to support, on the basis that if you want to see those names and see the whole monument from that side, that's the background, and some concessions have to be made to reality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support what other option is there besides extensive retouching work?--Ermell 12:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
File:McBratneys_Rd,_Dallington,_Christchurch,_Canterbury,_New_Zealand.jpg
[edit]- Nomination McBratneys Rd, Dallington --Podzemnik 08:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --XRay 09:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Technically well done. But I am sorry, I can not see what this picture is giving »valuable for Wikimedia«.--Augustgeyler 21:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Vote withdrawn. You confinced me.--Augustgeyler 16:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- It's not Wikipedia and it must not have a value for Wikimedia. Commons is an archive of media and the photograph fulfills the goal of the project. --XRay 04:31, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Augustgeyler: Usefulness is not a criterion here. This is QIC, where we judge technical quality. Also, Wikimedia is about building up a depository of images; we have no way of knowing which images will be valuable in the future. Please consult the Guidelines or ask us if you have any questions on how to judge images. --Peulle 08:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Peulle @XRay: You are opposing to my opinion this might not be a valuable motif. Of course I try to follow the guidelines. Point 2.1.7 states: „Our main goal is to encourage quality images [...], valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.“ – Quality_images_candidates#Value. What am I getting wrong about it?--Augustgeyler 08:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- It may be a little bit a misunderstanding. This photographs shows the McBratneys Road in Christchurch. So that is a good and valuable image. Most of the images are valuable because there are a lot of good reasons to use the photographs. (And it can be used everywhere, not only in the Wikimedia world.) Not valuable are party photos or all the typical social media photographs. --XRay 12:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, and a view down a street could easily be useful for an encyclopedia, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek 08:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Belfield_St,_Dallington,_Christchurch,_Canterbury,_New_Zealand.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Belfield St, Dallington --Podzemnik 08:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --XRay 09:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Technically well done. But I am sorry, I can not see what this picture is giving »valuable for Wikimedia«.--August Geyler 21:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Vote withdrawn. You confinced me.--August Geyler 16:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- It's not Wikipedia and it must not have a value for Wikimedia. Commons is an archive of media and the photograph fulfills the goal of the project. --XRay 04:32, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Augustgeyler: Usefulness is not a criterion here. This is QIC, where we judge technical quality. Also, Wikimedia is about building up a depository of images; we have no way of knowing which images will be valuable in the future. Please consult the Guidelines or ask us if you have any questions on how to judge images. --Peulle 08:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality and potentially even encyclopedically useful per above. -- Ikan Kekek 08:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Banco_conmemorativo,_plaza_de_San_Francisco,_Badajoz,_España,_2020-07-22,_DD_74.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Commemorative bench, San Francisco square, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 05:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose good picture, but not a quality one: missing true shadows and dynamic range --Augustgeyler 09:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Come on --Poco a poco 19:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Yes, a good picture. -- Ikan Kekek 08:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Enough shadow for me.--Ermell 12:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Salema_(Sarpa_salpa),_Setúbal,_Portugal,_2020-08-01,_DD_15.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Salema porgy (Sarpa salma), Setúbal, Portugal --Poco a poco 06:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose that perspective with that light background makes it impossible to so the main objects --Augustgeyler 09:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- There is no requirement about that, the porgies have a bright color close to the sand, but is that a reason to oppose? --Poco a poco 19:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- I think it is. --Augustgeyler 08:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support I can see them. It's harder to see things through water than through air. I think this is a solid QI, considering that. -- Ikan Kekek 08:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Not an easy picture to make but well done.--Ermell 12:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Widok_z_Kałkowa_na_Jezioro_Wióry_20200815_1038_0988.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View of Wióry Lake from Kałków village --Jakubhal 04:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose well composed, but too much haze --Augustgeyler 09:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- It is not a requirement for a QI to have super-clear sky and I would like to check what others think about it --Jakubhal 17:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support IMO OK. The haze is not a problem. --XRay 04:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Perfectly OK, per others. Haze can be a reason to oppose a nominee for FP, but this is QIC. -- Ikan Kekek 08:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Charleroi_-_Immeuble_ERCO_-_02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Charleroi (Belgique) - Immeuble ERCO situé au quai Paul Verlaine n° 9. Construit en 1951-1952 par l'architecte Adolphe Staatje de Bruxelles pour la société ERCO de Jean Regniers. Actuellement occupé par l'hôtel Ibis. --Jmh2o 19:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment leaning to the left --Celeda 15:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done I use de windows for the correction --Jmh2o 06:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support It's OK --Celeda 14:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose We should talk about it. For a qualtiy picture I am missing some good light comming from the side --Augustgeyler 09:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment (Je ne traduit pas par Google pour garder les nuances). La photo a été prise un 28 décembre un peu après 3 heures de l'après-midi. Le temps était très clair mais la lumière du soleil légère voilée par des nuages. Une lumière ne produisant quasiment pas d'ombres. J'ai profité de cette lumière et aussi qu'à cette saison il n'y a pas de feuilles sur les arbres. J'ai pris la photo à distance au 50 mm, donc quasiment sans distorsions. Mais peut-être qu'elle manque effectivement de qualité... --Jmh2o 06:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support C'est bien a mon avis. Solid QI. -- Ikan Kekek 08:42, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Чарские_Пески._Чудо-природы.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The smallest desert in the world (5x10 km) - Charsky Sands. Kodar, Zabaikalsky Krai, Russia. August 2014 --Veteran hiker 07:52, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but there are jpeg-artefacts above the horizon (left) and in the blue sky above the trees. They should be fixed. --PtrQs 01:13, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support I don't see any jpg artefacts. Seven Pandas 20:58, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose The artifacts mentioned by PtrQs are pretty transparent but quite evident. Look for ghost leaves above the tree and strange clear ripples above the horizon at the left side. This photo should not be promoted without edits to remove these defects. -- Ikan Kekek 21:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, compression artifacts and again oversharpening combined with denoising. This may be a result of the repeated demand for noise-free images here on QIC. After denoising, the images often look blurred, so the sharpness slider is used to correct this, but in fact it is made worse. Btw: probably somewhat high colour saturaton, but beautiful composition and lighting. --Smial 10:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, due to compression artifacts I have to say no. Could you upload a better compressed version?--Augustgeyler 08:04, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per others.--Peulle 07:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --Peulle 07:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Münster,_Hafen,_Liebesschlösser_--_2020_--_8246.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Love padlocks in the port of Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:43, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree.Perspective and time of day (or sun position) unsuitable. --Ichwarsnur 12:20, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I can't see any problem, perspective or sun position. It's a contre-jour photograph, the sun is part of the composition. --XRay 06:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support per XRay. Good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 21:30, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support In this case, the reflections and overexposures are clearly part of the image composition and should not be considered a technical error. --Smial 10:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposure might be part of the picture, but the lines in the foreground do interact badly with the horizon--Augustgeyler 11:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality --Jakubhal 12:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose agree August. Seven Pandas 20:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment XRay nominated so many (better) variants of this motive. I think we should not choose this one but the others.--Augustgeyler 22:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment For the record, on QIC, the number of other photos of a given motif is not a criterion in whether a photo should pass or not. I realize you have other objections to this photo, but I thought it was important to state this fact. -- Ikan Kekek 01:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Just a hint: QI isn't VI. And if you look for the best of all, please have a look to FP. --XRay 04:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I do know that this is not FP. And I just commented about the number of other given pictures of that motif to demonstrate that it was possible to find a much better angle to avoid those interacting lines between fore- and background.--Augustgeyler 07:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 07:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Rocca_da_Punta_Sasso_a_Manerba_del_Garda.jpg
[edit]- Nomination La Rocca peak from the Punta SassoManerba del Garda. --Moroder 14:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
OpposeI'm sorry to interfere, but the reviews by Ermell mixed up the two pictures with title 'La Rocca peak'. So here are, as he writes in the other review: Stitching error in the middle, two ghost birds on the left side and the right side is leaning. (and btw, some remarkable dust spots). As this conflicts with the inadvertently promotion, I'll have to send this to CR to give the delay to correct these artefacts. --PtrQs 23:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)- Comment @Moroder: See annotation for the error. --Ermell 20:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the hint. I fixed the cloning errors and the stitching error --Moroder 12:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Congratulations: it's nearly done - one last fat DS in the upper right corner, I marked it for you. Once it was easier, when the sensors were of the same size as our screens .. --PtrQs 01:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support close to perfect!--Augustgeyler 22:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done Thanks --Moroder 07:31, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support All OK now --PtrQs 17:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)