Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 26 2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:13-08-09_Taubertal_Jennifer_Rostock_Jennifer_1.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Jennifer, singer of Jennifer Rostock, on the Main Stage of the Taubertal Festival 2013. Image taken by User:AllSystemsRed. --Smial 20:45, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion VERY nice shot. But could your slightly reduce noise on the background (masked sharpening) and color noise on the darker areas? --Tuxyso 21:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC) Done. Is it better now ? --Vassil 19:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Meets the QI-criteria now definately. --High Contrast 20:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support. -- Spurzem 21:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 10:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I've overseen your correction. It's better now. --Tuxyso 14:17, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 21:12, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Restos_de_la_Catedral_de_San_Pablo,_Macao,_2013-08-08,_DD_05.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Remains of the Cathedral of St. Paul, Macau --Poco a poco 19:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose too overstraightened for me, sorry AleXXw 06:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  • What do you suggest me to do? reduce the correction? drop the nomination? Poco a poco 15:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I'm not in the position to tell you what to do, that is just my opinion. I was in Macao two days before you where there and from that position the outer edges can't be straight. Please take a look at the top of the top left column, they are spheric in nature. But let's hear other voices. --AleXXw 20:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I've never been there but I suspect that you were forced to take the shot too close to the monument. Am I right? Maybe the effect can be minimized by contracting the left part a bit, in the up-down direction. I agree that the distortion is too imposing. -- Alvesgaspar 20:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • The correction is simple but there is another problem ... I sent you an email. --Archaeodontosaurus 09:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
    ✓ New version uploaded following Archae's advice Poco a poco 15:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Poco a poco 15:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Pilatus PC-12 HB-FVA (1).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Pilatus PC-12, at the Prangins Fly-in (Switzerland) --Gzzz 20:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 07:17, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blown-out highlights. Clouds appear yellowish: WB off? --A.Savin 08:21, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done WB corrected : is it better now ? Gzzz 16:45, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
      • Actually, a few. However, overexposure is a "no go" for me, sorry. --A.Savin 20:32, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- Sorry Gzzz but light is just not good. Alvesgaspar 20:50, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Chevrolet_BelAir_logo_back_IMGP4763.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Trunk handle of a Chevrolet BelAir --Smial 10:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI for me. Useful. --Kadellar 11:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
    Not QI for me--الجوكر 11:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
    Why? You should give a reason to oppose. --Kadellar 12:50, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
     Support --Christian Ferrer 22:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
     Support. -- Spurzem 20:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Question Copyright problem ? I'm not sure this logo is free...--Jebulon 01:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
I believe this is not a copied logo. It is a photograph of a real 3D-object. -- Smial 11:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Some years ago, a photograph by me of the "real 3D-object" of the Cavallino Rampante of Ferrari, taken on a car like yours, was destroyed for " copyvio " reason...--Jebulon 20:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
I do not know US law in such cases. In Germany this would not be judged as illegal 2D reproduction. Maybe the image must be transferred to German wikipedia, I don't know. -- Smial 21:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
That's not really a question for the QI review but for a deletion request, no? Julian Herzog 13:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 21:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Chevrolet_BelAir_back_IMGP4770.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Chevrolet BelAir rear view. --Smial 10:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Quality is ok but IMO it's tilted on right, look at the building in background --Christian Ferrer 11:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
  • New version uploaded. -- Smial 12:33, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 22:14, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
    Some shadows urgently must be removed. -- Spurzem 17:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I don't know which shadows and I don't know how to do that. -- Smial 11:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  • There is the dark shadow at the right so that tires are not to be seen. Further I see a disturbing stripe on the trunk and shadow at the rear light left. Of course it will be difficult to reduce it. -- Spurzem 19:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- Sorry guys but the lighting conditions, with all those shadows, are not good. Alvesgaspar 20:58, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - too dark. Mattbuck 19:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Having done some curve-bending and tonemapping I could come up with this: --Kreuzschnabel 13:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:05, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Grantham railway station MMB 22 180102.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination 180102 at Grantham. Mattbuck 06:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose too soft for me --A.Savin 21:08, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
    • Sharpened. Mattbuck 17:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
      • But this doesn't provide better level of detail I think --A.Savin 20:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:03, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Castle Combe Circuit MMB C6 Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Castle Combe Circuit. Mattbuck 17:12, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • OK  Support --Rjcastillo 17:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. First, the image is unsharp. Second, there are too many distractions in the background and third it needs to be cropped (too much track and not enough car.) Royalbroil 01:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
    The subject is sharp. Mattbuck 16:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice lively an dynamic shot. Good quality. --Dirtsc 17:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Not a really great shot, but meets QI criteria. -- Smial 08:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- I'm with the opposer: the quality (sharpness, composition) is not really enough to pass the QI bar. Alvesgaspar 21:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. Not sharp enough for good quality. Further the hood is overexposed. The car should be bigger. -- Spurzem 20:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
    Overexposed? It's really not. Mattbuck 21:14, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --High Contrast 20:39, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 21:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Jagstquelle_im_August.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The spring of Jagst river, Germany, in a dry summer --Kreuzschnabel 17:12, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --JLPC 17:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's tilted CW. Too tight at top IMO--Lmbuga 21:15, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- No tilt that I see. But the framing is too tight on top and the light is not the best. Alvesgaspar 21:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Cam_Paradise_Reserve.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination (Renominated) River Cam in Paradise Fen nature reserve --Heuschrecke 22:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Oppose Greens are oversaturated. Strong oversaturation (see note)--Lmbuga 00:48, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
    The new version is better, but CAs and IMO oversharpened. Let's other users think: "Discuss"--Lmbuga 14:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support In my opinion good quality. -- Spurzem 20:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support -- A very nice picture. I can't see the oversaturation. Alvesgaspar 21:09, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 21:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)