Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 25 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Hankensbüttel - Friedhof.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hankensbüttel cemetery, Germany. By User:Oxfordian Kissuth. Blue Elf 10:30, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too much magenta. Magenta CA. Sky blown out. The last issue is not fixable, hence not a QI, sorry. --Cccefalon 13:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. I like such atmospheric photos. Blue sky is not necessary and here nearly impossible. -- Spurzem 14:41, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment Probably you are in the wrong place: The "I like" is related to facebook. Here in QIC, we are dealing with photographic quality. A blown out sky and chromatic aberrations are generally opposed to QI. --Cccefalon 14:58, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
      • I tried to explain that early in the morning when this photo was taken blue sky would be unusual. And your remark to facebook is misplaced. -- Spurzem 16:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
        • Lothar, mir gefällt das Bild ästhetisch auch gut. Aber darum geht es hier nicht, sondern ausschließlich darum, ob ein Bild den objektiven technischen und gestalterischen Anforderungen an QI genügt. Und das ist hier nicht gegeben, weil eine große Fläche überbelichtet ist, so schön das Bild an sich auch sein mag. Da das in der Gegenlichtsituation mit einer Einzelaufnahme unvermeidbar ist, kann man in dieser Situation halt kein QI anfertigen, oder höchstens per HDR (wenn das Laub stillhält). --Kreuzschnabel 16:46, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, as Cccefalon. Upper area overexposed and blown out--Lmbuga 06:13, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  SupportThe subject is not the sky, it is correctly overexposed becasue the sun is in front of you and in these cases you should expose on the path and trees. --Fulvio314 07:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Fulvio314, I’ve said above (in German, sorry): In such situations it is just not possible to take a QI as a single image. Picking good lighting conditions is one aspect of photographic work. Moving to CR now, as Spurzem should have done already when he added his support. --Kreuzschnabel 09:19, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, per Cccefalon --DKrieger 10:34, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
    • I would like to see how you could take a photo with sunbeams and blue sky. The photo of Hankensbüttel Friedhof for me is QI. -- Spurzem 21:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
      • Nobody demanded blue sky. And have you read what I said before in German? Even if this image is the best you could take under the circumstances, and even if it’s nice and fine, it still does not meet QI criteria due to the large blown area. That does not mean the picture is bad, it just does mean it doesn’t fit into this category here. --Kreuzschnabel 07:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry,per Cccefalon and Lmbuga --Livioandronico2013 08:32, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 12:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC)