Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 15 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Lathrecista asiatica 6409.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Lathrecista asiatica --Vengolis 01:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose looks unsharp and noisy. Charlesjsharp 22:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charles. Also unfortunately not well lit. -- Ikan Kekek 04:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 12:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Ictinogomphus rapax 5945.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ictinogomphus rapax --Vengolis 01:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose looks unsharp and noisy. Charlesjsharp 22:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Charles. --Basotxerri 20:29, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charles - doesn't quite make it to QI, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 04:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 12:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Tindfjallajökull,_Suðurland,_Islandia,_2014-08-16,_DD_131.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Tindfjallajökull, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 14:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality for me, Tournasol7 23:18, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry. In my eyes a panorama with such a low image hight should be sharper. --Milseburg 09:21, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough for QI as I think. -- Spurzem 20:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 04:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 12:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)