Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 15 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Spencer_Building_Vancouver_03.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination The Landing Building (left) and Spencer building (right), Vancouver, Canada --Xicotencatl 02:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blue fringe very disturbing. Unnecessarily tilted.--Jebulon 09:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose because of tilt. --SkywalkerPL 09:57, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 16:07, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Wuppertal_-_Engels-Haus_02_ies.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Engels-Haus im Historischen Zentrum, Wuppertal By User:Ies --Atamari 17:49, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too unsharp. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 02:43, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I think it is sharp enough for QI. Please discuss -- Spurzem 19:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I would expect more details for its size. --Xicotencatl 20:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. -- Smial 01:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --Christian Ferrer 18:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This kind of static object should/could be sharper IMO. --Jebulon 19:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too unsharp for static object. --Shansov.net 16:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   ----Hubertl 16:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)