Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 15 2014

• 
  • Nomination Eisenach, Germany: Marienstraße 6. --Cccefalon 04:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:49, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great Clock of Westminster during a 34 seconds long exposure. --Agatefilm 20:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Blurred, oversharpened, perspective issues. Not a QI. --Cccefalon 03:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eisenach, Germany: Hotel building of Wartburg Castle (Hotel auf der Wartburg) --Cccefalon 19:38, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Very good -- Spurzem 20:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A lizard; Detail of St.-Georgsbrunnen (Eisenach) --Cccefalon 19:38, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --DKrieger 21:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Omar Cummings of the MLS team Houston Dynamo -- Noah Salzman 19:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Not sharp enough. Background noisy. One dust spot. Quality not sufficient for QI IMO. --Cccefalon 03:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Triumph TR 4A, built from 1965 to 1967 -- Spurzem 19:14, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Tuxyso 19:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Minarets of the Hayat Bakshi Mosque, Hyderabad, India --Bgag 17:48, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, bright parts well managed. --Tuxyso 17:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wild Asian elephants (Elephas maximus maximus) in Minneriya National Park, Sri Lanka. --Kadellar 17:40, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice motive and very good colors. Only the bank line visually cutting the elephants distracts a bit. --Tuxyso 17:54, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
    Well, no way I could have changed that ;) Thanks for the review. --Kadellar 17:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mining waste tip (Halde Haniel) in Bottrop --Tuxyso 17:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Interesting --Iifar 17:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wild water monitor (Varanus salvator) near Polonnaruwa, Sri Lanka. --Kadellar 16:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Iifar 17:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gerbera (Gerbera x cultivar), in a private garden, France. --JLPC 16:34, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Iifar 16:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bear's breeches (Acanthus mollis) : dried leaves and fruit, in a private garden, France. --JLPC 16:34, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Florstein 17:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dahlia (Dahlia x cultivar), flower and leaves, in a private garden, France. --JLPC 16:34, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Nice! --Iifar 16:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ioannovsky Convent in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 15:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Iifar 17:07, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petropavlovsky Bridge in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 15:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Electrotechnical University in Saint Petersburg, 1st Building --Florstein 15:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Iifar 17:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Malva moschata, muskuskaasjeskruid. Location De Kruidhof.
    Famberhorst 15:37, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko, harvest in Kościelniki district 2 --Jacek Halicki 15:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Florstein 17:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko, harvest in Kościelniki district 3 --Jacek Halicki 15:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Iifar 17:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko, harvest in Kościelniki district 4 --Jacek Halicki 15:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Iifar 17:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko, harvest in Kościelniki district 5 --Jacek Halicki 15:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Variable resistor --Démosthène 14:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Florstein 15:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from a ridge between Segla and Hesten in Senja, Troms, Norway, in 2014 August --Ximonic 14:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
     Support Could be even FP. --Iifar 16:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Todi --Livioandronico2013 13:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Florstein 15:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eisenach, Germany: Stained glass window "Eisenacher Automobilbau" in Eisenach Railway station. --Cccefalon 08:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:07, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eisenach, Germany: Ernst-Abbe-Gymnasium. --Cccefalon 08:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good Quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:54, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eisenach, Germany: Landestheater Eisenach (Theater of the federal state of Thüringen) --Cccefalon 08:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:07, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eisenach, Germany: Haus Clemdastraße 2 --Cccefalon 08:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:07, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brigde over Młynówka channel in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination East Hendred, Oxfordshire --Stevage 08:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose sky overexposed. --A.Savin 08:38, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 390014 at Coventry. Mattbuck 06:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Qi imo. --ArildV 07:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The MV Teal at Lakeside. Mattbuck 06:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Qi imo. --ArildV 07:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Staithes, Yorkshire. Mattbuck 06:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. f/8 seems to be ok for that lens. --Smial 11:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 66112 at St Andrews Road. Mattbuck 06:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Florstein 17:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination TransPennine services at Manchester Piccadilly. Mattbuck 06:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Iifar 17:11, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Man in Todi --Livioandronico2013 06:48, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of an Orange Mitre, Mitra aurantia aurantia forma nanus --Llez 04:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hortus Haren. Resting place in the Floriade Garden.
    Famberhorst 04:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ernst-Abbe Memorial in Eisenach, Germany --Cccefalon 04:03, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion High quality. --ArildV 08:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eisenach, Germany: Villa Herr, Marienstrasse 59. --Cccefalon 04:03, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Perfect. --Livioandronico2013 07:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eisenach, Germany: Detail of Luther memorial --Cccefalon 04:03, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Livioandronico2013 14:14, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Memorial to the Sinti and Roma victims of National Socialism, Berlin, Germany --XRay 03:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --ArildV 08:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 20:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion could be sharper (especially for a D800), but QI anyway --Taxiarchos228 06:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bayon, Angkor Thom, Cambodia --Poco a poco 17:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support A bit dark, but nevertheless QI. --Iifar 17:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Steam-train at Treis-Karden on the river Mosel, Germany -- Spurzem 15:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Pity it’s so noisy. Can you do anything about that? --Kreuzschnabel 19:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
     Weak support Noise is not an issue for me. There is lack of some fine detail, probably because of the lenses. Nevertheless it's good enough for me. --Iifar 17:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tanacetum vulgare 'crispum', boerenwormkruid. Location De Kruidhof.
    Famberhorst 15:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very beautiful colors --Livioandronico2013 14:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View in Villamanín de la Tercia, León, Spain -20 --Lmbuga 09:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. --Livioandronico2013 06:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opal 1 student housing. Mattbuck 06:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Dark,unsharp,blurred especially on the left. --Livioandronico2013 07:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the surrounding of the Ostrog monastery, Montenegro --Poco a poco 13:53, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good qualiy --ArildV 07:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ferry Hilligenlei moored in the port of Langeness --Dirtsc 13:40, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 07:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shop in Delsbo, Hudiksvall Municipality. --ArildV 10:01, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment IMO it's good, but tilted CW.--XRay 12:22, 10 August 2014 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 15:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
     Support OK now.--XRay 15:46, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel of the cemetery “Père Lachaise”, Paris, France --XRay 07:42, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --Livioandronico2013 06:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mavrovo Lake, Macedonia --Poco a poco 13:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Me gustan todas las de Mavrovo, aquí una pena el cable ;) --Kadellar 17:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Katy Perry in concert. Mattbuck 08:23, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
    Dark areas have pixelation/noise Poco a poco 14:16, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Never mind, not sharp enough for QI. Mattbuck 21:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Construction site of the Dortmund-Ems Canal near Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
    Lovely, but a few bits of dust. Mattbuck 08:23, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
     Fixed The white pixel at the bottom are removed, the dust spot at the left too. The spot in the middle is smoke the the chimney seen at the picture.--XRay 10:30, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Lovely. --Mattbuck 21:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Telekom Tower Sternengasse (Cologne, Germany) --Cccefalon 15:58, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice. --Mattbuck 22:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clock tower in a rainy day, Pristina, Kosovo --Poco a poco 09:50, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry, there's a particularly disturbing (close?) raindrop right over the clockface. --Mattbuck 22:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Death of the virgin from an unknown copyist upon the original of Hugo can der Goes. This copy is exhibited in the Museum of Sint-Salvatorskathedraal, Bruges, Belgium --Cccefalon 04:10, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 22:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cologne, Germany: Participants of the Cologne Pride Parade 2014 - Gay Choir "Die Zauberflöten" --Cccefalon 20:02, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:48, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination School in Bonn, Germany (by Hasenläufer).--Leit 16:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Dust spot must be removed, then Qi (see note).--Villy Fink Isaksen 16:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
    Qi dust is gone. Villy Fink Isaksen 15:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rosa 'A Whiter Shade of Pale', by User:Arashiyama. --Anna reg 22:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment IMO a little bit dark.--XRay 11:29, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose - dark, blue fringeing. Mattbuck 22:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Natural monument (No. 29) in the Steinburg district in Brokstedt. A maybe 300-400 year old oak. --Nightflyer 22:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Not sharp enough IMO, right side leaning in, left side blurry. --Mattbuck 22:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Čičmany (Csicsmány), Slovakia - old house --Pudelek 21:17, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rainbows over Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 17:51, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 22:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ghosts in an old NATO station, Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 17:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Significant loss of detail to channel overexposure. --Mattbuck 22:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inside an old NATO station, Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 17:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Significant loss of detail to channel overexposure. --Mattbuck 22:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clock, Conciergerie, Paris, France --XRay 16:52, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed IMO. --Mattbuck 22:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dąbrówki district in Kłodzko 5 --Jacek Halicki 15:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Careless composition - the wire and sign. --Mattbuck 22:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dąbrówki district in Kłodzko 6 --Jacek Halicki 15:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 22:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of Olivenhain Reservoir in California - - Philkon 14:41, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Vidal church in Venice --Moroder 07:09, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Inconsistent sharpness. --Mattbuck 22:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination FHRA Drag Racing starting tree ("christmas tree) at Kamasa Drag Race Week, Alastaro Circuit, Finland. Makele-90 17:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Most of the parts are unsharp. Please check. I would use another crop for the main motiv.--XRay 07:00, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
    The background is too distracting. Mattbuck 22:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta) in the Val Lasties in the Sella Group --Moroder 10:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Nice picture, but I feel it is a too wide angle for the bird picture (which is the subject of your picture), moreover the bird is not that sharp at 100%. Waiting for other user comments Gormé 23:04, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
    I concur with Gormé. Mattbuck 22:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Natural monument in Vienna --Geiserich77 09:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Needs perspective correction and removal of a sky disturbance. See note. --Cccefalon 09:55, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
     Not done, nothing sharp. Mattbuck 22:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountains at the austrian and italian border --Geiserich77 09:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Please remove magenta CA. Also it seems that you saved with a JPG compression factor, resulting in a not so good sky quality. Can you eventually save with 100% JPG quality? --Cccefalon 09:51, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
     Not done Mattbuck 22:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Timmelbach in national park Hohe Tauern --Geiserich77 09:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Needs removal of the magenta fringe at the top of the cloud and removal of a magenta CA. I made two annotations. --Cccefalon 09:58, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
     Not done Mattbuck 22:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture of a blowpipe at the roundabout of Pekan Kemabong. --Cccefalon 09:04, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Bottom is blurred. --Mattbuck 22:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination In the Nursery, Amphi festival 2014 --Atamari 08:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination In the Nursery, Amphi festival 2014 --Atamari 08:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Jarandilla de La Vera --Stegop 02:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Posterisation in the sky. --Mattbuck 22:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A view of Jackson Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 00:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline An image a bit dull, but maybe that isn't a problem. Isn't the sky a bit greenish? --Stegop 02:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
    Oversharpened, noted as dull/green, wires spoil it. Mattbuck 22:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Montour Power Plant, Montour County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 00:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline The light certainly doesn't help, but it looks UE. --Stegop 02:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose - dull, loss of detail in the foliage. Mattbuck 22:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mother Teresa Cathedral, Pristina, Kosovo --Poco a poco 18:22, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
    The thing on the right should be painted out instead of being half in. That said, the extreme perspective is a bit off-putting. Not sure about this one, though the technical quality is excellent. Mattbuck 20:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
     New version Poco a poco 14:33, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 22:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ostrog monastery, Montenegro --Poco a poco 18:22, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
    A bit blurry at the top, perhaps a different crop? Mattbuck 20:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
     Done Poco a poco 14:33, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Better. --Mattbuck 22:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Juggernauts, Amphi festival 2014 --Atamari 01:11, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
    I'm not sold on the composition. Mattbuck 20:04, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good for me. --Livioandronico2013 15:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Metro station “Pigalle”, Paris, France --XRay 03:24, 1 August 2014 (UTC) Comment I'd suggest you reduce the contrast!?--Moroder 13:04, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Fixed Thanks. A new image with less contrast is uploading ...--XRay 11:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
    QI for me --Livioandronico2013 15:54, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roue crantée objectif caméra / Rig control used for cinema and television lenses -- Gormé 17:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC) Comment Shadow on left is too large and dark, pulls the eye from the subject --Generic1139 16:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
    I like the shadow, but there's a hair in it. Mattbuck 10:57, 2 August 2014 (UTC) Hi ! I uploaded a new file with the hair correction, hope you will like it better Gormé 22:24, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Not done --Mattbuck 19:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC) OK then. Mattbuck 22:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Scarborough MMB 45.jpg

• Nomination Scarborough, Yorkshire. Mattbuck 06:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Oppose Magenta CA (fixable). Faces of persons and details (shovel, sand hill) not sharp enough (not fixable). Sorry, no QI. --Cccefalon 10:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Before „Decline“ more people should discuss. I see no significant lack. -- Spurzem 11:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
    •  Oppose Hello, can not be discussed for each photo and I think Cccefalon however, has been more than exhaustive and in my opinion there is nothing to reproach him. He decline a myriad of my photos (even today) and I just thank him because he certainly understands more than me and many others here. Going back to the photo, I'm sorry Mattbuck, but I think like him. If something is fixable Cccefalon he does not always notice and accepts if it is fixable. Excuse me if I have dwelt, and of course I do not have with you. See you soon. --Livioandronico2013 12:50, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment Spurzem: Das mit dem CR funktioniert so, daß derjenige, der mit einem Review nicht einverstanden ist – in diesem Fall also du –, seine abweichende Ansicht hinschreibt und die Nomination auf Discuss ändert. Es gibt keinen Grund, vom anderen zu erwarten, von vornherein auf Discuss zu gehen – denn woher soll der Erstreviewer wissen, daß du das Bild für nicht ablehnenswert hältst? Das Empfinden von Bildmängeln ist nun mal unterschiedlich. --Kreuzschnabel 14:13, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Cccefalon. Blur seems to involve some camera shake. --Kreuzschnabel 05:25, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination - This is not QI, my apologies. Mattbuck 18:28, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Trash on the ancient Via Appia.jpg

• Nomination Trash on the ancient Via Appia --Livioandronico2013 20:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
• Withdrawn  Comment Please have a look to the perspective. The trash is leaning out on both sides.--XRay 12:17, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
   Fixed Better now? Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 21:01, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
   Comment Sorry, IMO it's not fixed.--XRay 16:08, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  Then,can you repeat what's wrong? thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 19:14, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose - it is still leaning out on both sides. It's also partially obscured, and the top left crop is careless. Mattbuck 22:48, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Livioandronico2013 23:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

File:2014-07-26_Clan_of_Xymox_(Amphi_festival_2014)_005.JPG

• Nomination Clan of Xymox, Amphi festival 2014 --Atamari 21:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Ok for a stage shot, but is yet rotated ccw. Easy to fix. --Cccefalon 09:14, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
   Comment i rotate the image 1,7° --Atamari 23:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
  Also please sharpen and fix CA on the lights at the back and her hair. Mattbuck 11:01, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
  *  Support Though sharpness is not absolutely perfect on the face, this is acceptable regarding the circumstances. CA is not an issue as it affects only out of focus background objects which are completely irrelevant for this photo. --Smial 12:29, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose until such time as my concerns above are fixed. Mattbuck 19:43, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
  

@Mattbuck: this is longitudal CA which is not easily fixable. It can often be reduced by stopping down the aperture, what is not the choice when you need wide open aperture due to low light situation. If you decline all images with small drawbacks which are taken under such difficult circumstances, we will not really get many QI from sports or stage. You can not measure action photography with the same standards like architectural photography, in which you can work with tripod and water level and any time you want. "Three songs, no flash". -- Smial 09:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Try the photoshop desaturating sponge tool. As for lack of QIs for sports or stage - so what? QI doesn't care about what you take a photo of, or any extenuating circumstances. We don't care about value or "wow", we care only about technical quality. It doesn't matter if to take the photo you had to be lowered from a crane over hot lava with someone shooting you, if it's out of focus, shows CA, is badly composed, etc etc etc, it's not QI! Now, I grant you my bug here is relatively minor, but it most certainly is fixable. Mattbuck 22:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

You can not specify absolute quality criteria in photography. Ok, you can, but it makes absolutely no sense. You can always judge only relative to other photographs of the same genre. Otherwise you would have to reject any conventional close-up, since it does not have the depth of field of architecture photos and you would have to reject every night shooting, as it is mostly too dark and has loss of detail. Besides, you'd have to reject every panoramic photo, because the perspective is always distorted compared to rectilinear lenses. About post processing with Photoshop tools: I do not have Photoshop as it is much do expensive and use except the Rawkonverter only free software. But perhaps the job could be done by someone, who has already shown (1) how to convert a photo to a perfect quality image? -- Smial 11:19, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Ok --Livioandronico2013 08:25, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Perhaps not excellent, but good quality. -- Spurzem 16:19, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Cccefalon 07:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Petrovac,_Montenegro,_2014-04-18,_DD_02.JPG

• Nomination Petrovac, Bay of Kotor, Montenegro --Poco a poco 17:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:05, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  {{o}} The horizon is tilted CW and dust spot (see note). Improvable and QI for me in the future if...--Lmbuga 00:50, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Fixed Thanks! Poco a poco 06:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good. thanks--Lmbuga 20:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Ok --LivioAndronico talk 12:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

File:2014-07-26_Corvus_Corax_(Amphi_festival_2014)_073.JPG

• Nomination Corvus Corax, Amphi festival 2014 --Atamari 08:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion {{Comment}} A bit of noise and lack of contrast IMO--Lmbuga 18:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
   Comment Of all the uploads from this event, this image is one of the better ones. DOF is good, main subject is in focus, his hands and instrument are not cut off, no motion blur, individual strands of hair visible. I don't see any objectionable noise. The low contrast of the background helps separate the main subject from the rest of the band. I think this one is acceptable --Generic1139 19:41, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
   Comment It was just a comment. I beg your pardom, Generic. Why don't you promove it?, sorry, I don't understand your behavior --Lmbuga 01:35, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
  {{o}} Sorry: "Discuss" because it's improvable (see said before), but it can be QI IMO--Lmbuga 01:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me. @Lmbuga - I didn't want to just promote it over your implied request for improvement. I will take bolder action next time --Generic1139 14:58, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Sorry, mistake. Two times mistake. The comment was about a different picture. I do not understand not having realized--Lmbuga 11:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

File:What's the point.jpg

• Nomination Geodetic marker --Kleuske 12:45, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
• Too much unused space on the left, and I don’t like the cut splosh on the right edge. Suggest a 2:3 upright crop. --Kreuzschnabel 09:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

   Not done Mattbuck 17:43, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

  Image is sharp, quality is good, including composition. "I don't like it" is no reason to decline. Kleuske 08:10, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  Kreuzschnabel was referring to composition. I concur with them.  Oppose. Mattbuck 22:12, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

  That's "I don't like it" twice. If you want this list to be taken seriously, you'll have to do better.Kleuske 14:38, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

  QI is very much about what you like and don't like - photography is inherently about that. Yes, there are certain things, such as sharpness, which are not a matter of like or dislike, but exact colour balance, exact brightness levels, focal length and yes, composition, are all about whether the image "feels" right. You say yourself "composition is good" - on what objective basis are you making that? There is no rule for what makes a composition "good", it is all about what feels right, and two people are telling you that this one does not feel right. If you want to be taken seriously you should start acting with a little good faith. That someone declines your image does not mean they are being obnoxious, it means they saw your photo and didn't think it was as good as you do. That's fine, that's what QI is for - no one would nominate images if they didn't believe they were probably good enough. Some images get voted up, some down, and if you disagree you can as for a second opinion, but just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they are doing it out of spite. Mattbuck 18:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Support. Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:27, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support The "splosh" is a bit disturbing, but the composition is obvisiously intended and makes sense to me. The image is sharp, has correct exposure and is not to small. -- Smial 15:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Ok --Livioandronico2013 20:02, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Boats in the Canal de Sète.jpg

• Nomination Boats in the Canal de Sète --Christian Ferrer 05:42, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion The prow and the name of La Sardine is out of focus, degrading an otherwise excellent image. As the green prow is in the center of the image, I don't think this one is QI. --Generic1139 05:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
  Me I think it's acceptable --Christian Ferrer 10:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
  For me its a QI. --~~~~ last comment by User:Hubertl --Christian Ferrer 12:15, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support DOF is not perfect, but not a big problem here. -- Smial 12:24, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Famberhorst 15:29, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, especially good colours. -- Spurzem 18:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Zamek Hluboka 001 THWZ.jpg

• Nomination Hlouboká Castle --THWZ 23:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Comment Please check your image. The image is noisy and needs perspective correction. May be it's tilted CCW.--XRay 05:06, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done Better? --THWZ 07:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry, no. Please have a look to the middle.--XRay 08:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)  Done After further corrections, I can't detect any more correctable vertical lines. Should be enough for QI. --THWZ 10:32, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
   Comment Sorry. I know it is difficult. In my opinion, the tower tends still to the left. I set this review to "discussion" for other opinions.--XRay 10:45, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Very good light and sky, but perspective/tilt is not good yet and denoising is too strong (elements are washed out, if you compare it with first version. --Iifar 18:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment There's nothing "washed out" by denoizing, there are no more verticals tilted more then given by the architect (or the builder), so, whats your personel problem with this picture?? --THWZ 20:15, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment I was already working to fix this image issues, but after your last disparaging remark, I lost the appetite to do it. Last version is not QI for me. --Iifar 05:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment The verticals are close now, just a few pixels tilt here and there. The two front-facing corner extensions on the center tower (the one with the crest) taper in as they go up, don't use those to judge by. The geometry is close, and probably close enough. The tall tower is mostly optical illusion, not looking straight on at the octagon, shadows, and stair-stepping. The big problem is the loss of sharpness between the first upload and the most recent. In an image where the number of pixels had changed only 3%, the file size has changed 10% (and in some versions, as much as 45%), some smoothing has occurred. It is most visible to the eye in the shrubs to the right of the entrance walkway, but also in the building stones. There is also a bird that needs cloned out above and to the left of the antenna on the tall tower. I think this is an interesting image, and deserves a little more work. --Generic1139 20:50, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Great image overprocessed. Please rework from scratch rsp. raw file as also mentioned in de:wp:keb. -- Smial 12:28, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose overprocessed --Christian Ferrer 17:39, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB «X5 Emirates Royal Docks.jpg

• Nomination Emirates Royal Docks. Mattbuck 06:48, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  CommentNice composition and lighting. Pity the cableway car is a bit blurry, and there’s minor CA in the structure on the left. Can you fix it? --Kreuzschnabel 09:27, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
   Done Mattbuck 23:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  weak  Oppose To me the cable car including the pylon is too blurred, and the cables already show sharpening artifacts. Maybe I’m pixelpeeping though. Let’s have some more opinions on CR. --Kreuzschnabel 10:35, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
• weak  Support. The lens is obvisiosly somewhat soft and weak at the corners, not the first image by matt with those flaws. But this shot is in my opinion good enough. -- Smial 12:51, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support per Smial --Christian Ferrer 17:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support agree.. @Smail: you atre right. it's an 18-200mm. stopping down could help in some cases. DerFussi 05:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Tungku_Sabah-Sekolah-Kebangsaan-Tungku-02.jpg

• Nomination Sekolah Kebangsaan Tungku (SK Tungku), the primary school of Tungku --Cccefalon 05:57, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment - Rather green isn't it? --Mattbuck 10:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment - A green meadow, grean leaves and a green fence. There is no green in the other parts (sky, wood ...). The green in Borneo is a little bit more lush than in Great Britain, I am sorry. See my other photos of Borneo and you will find out, that this photo isn't more green than the others. --Cccefalon 06:10, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment You’ll hardly find any lusher grass than in Britain :-) This has been taken on a dull and rainy day. Out of camera, no saturation applied. --Kreuzschnabel 05:39, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me --Halavar 14:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good one. -- Smial 12:53, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good --Livioandronico2013 23:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good --Hamster28 09:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

File:CubeVacuum.jpg

• Nomination Cubic vacuum chamber for cold atom experiments, --Démosthène 03:20, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
  {{o}} Sorry, it needs perspective correction, left side of the cube is tilted. Dust spot. See notes. Improvable--Lmbuga 18:09, 1 August 2014 (UTC),  Done Perspective corrected. --Démosthène 03:28, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Better, thanks, but dust spot. Might change the vote. I will consider changing the vote listening to others users--Lmbuga 08:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Removed the dust spot and a dead pixel too. I think it can be promoted even if the background is a bit noisy -- Gormé 22:46, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support now. --JLPC 16:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good now--Lmbuga 09:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Livioandronico2013 15:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Parque_Nikola_Šubić_Zrinski,_Zagreb,_Croacia,_2014-04-20,_DD_02.jpg

• Nomination Nikola Šubić Zrinski park, Zagreb, Croatia --Poco a poco 17:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Corners are distorted, colours seem off. --Mattbuck 22:46, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
   Fixed Poco a poco 21:04, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
  No feedback, can we please discuss it? --Poco a poco 07:03, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose looks somewhat overexposed but with dull colours in the highlights. I would expect some sparkling in the water, but it is all in all grey. Not a good image of a fountain in the sunshine. -- Smial 13:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
•  New version: I have uploaded a last version without really sharing Smial's comments. Sharpness is ok, no overexposure, curves looks fine to me, composition could be better but is acceptable IMHO, so I do think that all in all it is a QI, Poco a poco 06:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 01:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me too --Livioandronico2013 08:26, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. I'm not perfectly happy with the result, but it's now good enough, thx for your work, and patience. -- Smial 10:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Medieval windows of Mausoleum of Cecilia Metella.jpg

• Nomination Medieval windows of Mausoleum of Cecilia Metella --Livioandronico2013 21:26, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion {{o}} Tilted and it needs IMO perspective correction. ISO 200 and f/14 is not the best to this kind of pictures. In my opinion, in this kind of pictures horizontal lines must be straight, but it's only my opinion. The detail is not good IMO. Unbalanced--Lmbuga 23:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
   Done hola, I straightened and I adjusted the perspective,better? --Livioandronico2013 00:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
  Sorry, not QI to me, blurry and poor detail--Lmbuga 00:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
  Ok,thanks for review,I tried :) --Livioandronico2013 00:24, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment It could probably reach QI if it's downsampled and sharpened. --Lewis Hulbert 00:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done see now. Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 07:25, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Sorry, the second version of the picture is much better than the last (too oversharpened). The window doesn't is in the center of the image (and does not respect the rule of two-thirds). The perspective correction is slightly excessive IMO, it could be a little bit less. --Lmbuga 08:54, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Done Now? Thanks for your review, I'm learning a lot --Livioandronico2013 12:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Can we please discuss it? --Livioandronico2013 15:56, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
    • Sorry, to me now it's not QI because it's too overexposed oversharpened.--Lmbuga 11:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Done by Lmbuga, Please, review--Lmbuga 12:45, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Es mucho mejor, gracias :) --Livioandronico2013 12:56, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Better now, but I think it would be a bit better downscaled a little more. Perhaps 3500×2625? --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 23:04, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

I understand you but in Commons:Image guidelines is said Images should not be downsampled (sized down in order to appear of better quality). Downsampling reduces the amount of information stored in the image file.--Lmbuga 01:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now. -- Smial 11:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Dories-63.jpg

• Nomination View of Dories --Stegop 13:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  SupportGood quality. --Uoaei1 13:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, vignetting is too much for this low resolution. --P e z i 21:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
  Vignetting? Are you sure? I have never noticed vignetting with this camera in such light conditions and I don't see it here. --Stegop 22:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC) Comment Perhaps it's not vignetting but the dark corners look strange to me. --P e z i 23:07, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
  I don't see any dark corners. Are you talking about the gradient on the sky? It was morning and probably I used polariser so it is only natural. --Stegop 04:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me --Halavar 12:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me too --Livioandronico2013 07:17, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI -- DerFussi 04:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Lądek-Zdrój,_Rynek_7_08.JPG

• Nomination 7 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 07 --Jacek Halicki 11:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion flooding --Stegop 13:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 21:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me --Halavar 12:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Lądek-Zdrój,_Rynek_7_09.JPG

• Nomination 7 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 08 --Jacek Halicki 11:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion flooding --Stegop 13:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 21:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me --Halavar 12:41, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Lądek-Zdrój,_Rynek_7_10.JPG

• Nomination: 7 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 09 --Jacek Halicki 11:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
• Review flooding --Stegop 13:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC) Comment IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 21:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Lądek-Zdrój,_Rynek_7_11.JPG

• Nomination: 7 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 10 --Jacek Halicki 11:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
• Review flooding --Stegop 13:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC) Comment IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 21:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Lądek-Zdrój,_Rynek_7_12.JPG

• Nomination: 7 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 11 --Jacek Halicki 11:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
• Review flooding --Stegop 13:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC) Comment IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 21:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

File:2014-07-26_Corvus_Corax_(Amphi_festival_2014)_028.JPG

• Nomination Corvus Corax, Amphi festival 2014 --Atamari 08:06, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

 Comment It would be even better if the elbow on the right was cropped because he is in focus --Generic1139 22:16, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

oppose bad crop --Generic1139 04:41, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Added a crop suggestion. -- Smial 13:15, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment cropping --Atamari 19:01, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Thx, good now -- Smial 22:13, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:42, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Ok with new crop --Generic1139 06:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Cayambe 06:24, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Widok_na_miasto_Karakorum_15.jpg

• Nomination View of the city. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia. --Halavar 17:15, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality. (Please add geo location.) --XRay 17:21, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
   Done --Halavar 18:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
   Comment I'm really sorry. I haven't seen it yesterday. There are chromatic problems at the building in the middle. Additionaly the building is leaning in. Please check your image. Thank you. --XRay 06:16, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
   Done I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 10:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
   CommentIt's better but I think the building is still leaning in.--XRay 04:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
   Done I uploaded new version. It's hard to make all buildings straight in this image. I tried once again, hope it's better now. If not, I give up... --Halavar 11:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
   Support Don't worry. IMO it's OK now.--XRay 05:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Michaelerkirche Steyr Ostturm DSC 2722w.jpg

• Nomination Parish church Saint Michael, Eastern clocktower, Steyr, Upper Austria --P e z i 00:04, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion The perspective is inverted (looks \/, when the natural is /\). Otherwise it looks good. --Stegop 00:21, 27 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 01:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  Sorry, but now it is slightly tilted CCW. --Stegop 19:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC) Done Again new version uploaded. --P e z i 13:31, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  Sorry again, the perspective is still inverted; but I won't insist, let's see what the others say. --Stegop 04:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

 Support I'd give a conditioned support to the cloning out of the left bottom corner, cheers --Moroder 12:00, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks for supporting. New version uploaded. --P e z i 17:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Better now. QI for me --Halavar 16:42, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC 15:23, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --JLPC 15:23, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Michaelerkirche Steyr Westturm DSC 2720w.jpg

• Nomination Parish church Saint Michael, Western clocktower, Steyr, Upper Austria --P e z i 00:04, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion The perspective is inverted (looks \/, when the natural is /\). Otherwise it looks good. Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 01:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  It is still slightly \/, but maybe that's OK; let's see what the others think. --Stegop 19:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
•  Support In my opinion no lack. Very good photo! -- Spurzem 09:20, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with Spurzem. QI for me --Halavar 11:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support agree DerFussi 04:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --JLPC 15:22, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Friese ballonfeesten in Joure 02.JPG

• Nomination Hot Air Balloon Festival in Joure province of Friesland in the Netherlands.
  Famberhorst 05:17, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion

Can you reduce the magenta fringe? --Cccefalon 05:33, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done Correction Famberhorst 06:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:57, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

The sky's rather cyan don't you think? --Mattbuck 07:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

 Comment It is very acceptable. Not worse than your magentaish sky's, Matt. --Cccefalon 07:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

•  Support The 17:01 version solves all of the above problems. --Generic1139 15:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blurry, and the people too blurred. Too tight at top IMO--Lmbuga 17:25, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Cayambe 06:15, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Lüdinghausen,_Flugplatz_Borkenberge_--_2014_--_1114.jpg

• Nomination Air field Borkenberge near Lüdinghausen, Germany --XRay 10:47, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Sincerely I don't understand what sense this picture makes, maybe it needs a better description?--Moroder 19:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

• Promotion

 Fixed Thanks. I've added "speakers ..." to the description.--XRay 05:47, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Moroder 16:32, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

I think the speakers (main subject) are too dark. --El Grafo 08:15, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

•  Fixed Thanks. It's fixed now.--XRay 17:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
   Support --Generic1139 15:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Cayambe 06:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

File:OceanCityBay.JPG

• Nomination: Bay of Ocean City, Maryland (USA) --Démosthène 02:52, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
• Review Tilted ccw. Magenta CA. At least 2 disturbances in the sky (see notes). All fixable. --Cccefalon 06:41, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
   Done New file uploaded. I hope it's better now but feel free to reverse. --JLPC 21:18, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
   Support Now it looks ok to me. --Stegop 13:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose - dust spot to the right of the plane. Mattbuck 20:21, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

   Fixed Correction of the dust spot, --Démosthène 03:28, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

  The spot is still visible, just it's now a wider darkish bit. Mattbuck 10:17, 2 August 2014 (UTC)