Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 13 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Walkway and pond at Palm House, Kew Gardens.jpg

[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 16:39, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common_blue_(Polyommatus_icarus)_male_underside_3.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Common blue (Polyommatus icarus) male, Aston Upthorpe Downs, Oxfordshire --Charlesjsharp 08:57, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Simply too much chroma noise on the background. --A.Savin 17:13, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
I agree, new version uploaded. Charlesjsharp 21:25, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support looks good. But IMHO even the old version was good enough for quality image, I seen more noisy photographs going through. --SkywalkerPL (talk) 15:04, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Iifar 17:30, 7 August 2015
  •  Support -- Spurzem 22:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)(UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Jean11 13:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Ariane 62 and 64.svg

[edit]

  • Nomination Both variants of Ariane 6. Made as a replacement of this image for English wikipedia. --SkywalkerPL 13:24, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There is little definition in the small file size. Not sure what QI guidelines are for svg images. Charlesjsharp 09:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Really? I was concerned about going in too much detail... but ok, I added more to the graphic. And as far as I'm aware - there are no guidelines specifically for the vector arts. SkywalkerPL 18:02, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 21:34, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann 08:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Jean11 12:59, 12 August 2015 (UTC)