Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 12 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Roses_in_Bauman_Garden_IMG_7820_08.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Roses in Bauman Garden --Sunny365days 06:12, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose All roses are beautiful but not sharp exept one at bottom right. Also categories of location should be added. --Екатерина Борисова 01:56, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Added "Bauman Garden" Category. --Drow male 12:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Moving this to CR assuming that you wish to challenge the vote. Please do not revert to "Nomination" once there is a vote. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lack of DoF, per Екатерина. --Plozessor 04:09, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Екатерина, all roses but one are out of focus, sorry. --Benjism89 15:28, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 20:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Navy_Moskva_and_Ivanovets_2012_G1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Russian Navy corvette Ivanovets (954), missile cruiser Moskva (121) -- George Chernilevsky 04:01, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:04, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Level of detail too low --Augustgeyler 04:54, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment All these photos are historical. They were taken in 2012, now almost all these ships are sunk because of the war and cannot be re-shot. The so-called "Russian warship" Moskva (121) in the background. During the shooting there was morning haze and smoke from the engines. I check the sharpness of the pictures by the image of the handrails. Regarding the size of the images, they correspond to guidlines, more than 2 Mp. This is not a downsampling, cropping only --George Chernilevsky 05:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support More than 6 MPixels and by far sharp enough for a decent A4 size print. --Smial 07:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --Plozessor 03:50, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough --Jakubhal 05:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 08:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Navy_Moskva_and_Turbinist_2012_G2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Russian Navy minesweeper Turbinist (912), missile cruiser Moskva (121) -- George Chernilevsky 04:01, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Level of detail too low --Augustgeyler 04:54, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support More than 6 MPixels and by far sharp enough for a decent A4 size print. --Smial 07:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --Plozessor 03:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough --Jakubhal 05:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 08:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Kia_Seltos_IMG_0140.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Kia Seltos in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 14:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment At full size the Image is soft and feels out of focus, but its very large. If you reduce the image size, you may be able to fix that. --Needsmoreritalin 15:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I see your point, but reducing the resolution isn't a option if I understand it correctly - you can already view the lower resolution now. Please discuss. --Alexander-93 18:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too many parts of this car are not in focus. --Augustgeyler 11:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 20:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Liège_BW_2019-08-17_15-25-22.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Belgium, Liège, Eglise Notre-Dame-de-l'Immaculée-Conceptón --Berthold Werner 12:26, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 15:05, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Looks unnatural because of too strong PC and also not sharp at the top --Екатерина Борисова 01:44, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:42, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Екатерина, too distorted. --Augustgeyler 11:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support It's ok for me. Although the file name could be more specific. --Tournasol7 13:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with Екатерина: photo was taken too close to the object, so after PC it looks higly distorted. Красный 05:34, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with Красный --Georgfotoart 20:05, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 20:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)