Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 07 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Necrosyrtes_monachus_-_Vogelpark_Steinen_03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hooded vulture; Bird park Steinen, Germany --Llez 05:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 09:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose It seems as if the eye lacks sharpness (motion blur?), especially compared to the other photo of the head from this series. --Аныл Озташ 16:58, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lacks sharpness, I agree with Аныл Озташ --Tagooty 03:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:38, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Trier_Sankt-Matthias_Kapitell_(34).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Capital in the cloister of St. Matthias Abbey, Trier, Germany. Praying Moses with Aaron and Hur. --Palauenc05 02:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Tilted cw --Tagooty 03:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
    Tilted cw. Is fixable. --Tagooty 04:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment The columns on the right at the edge of the picture and the blurred window on the left in the background seem to me to be vertical. Maybe the main subject is not perfectly angled like a Lego brick? --Smial 09:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Thanks for your comments I've tried again to work on it from the raw file and uploaded a new version with slight corrections. I guess that's the best I can do. --Palauenc05 10:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, thanks --Tagooty 00:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 15:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks better. --Smial 16:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Above_the_cloud_from_Air_Vistara_24.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Above the cloud from Air Vistara --Wasiul Bahar 20:38, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Not categorised --F. Riedelio 07:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose  Not done within a week --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
    @F. Riedelio sorry for the late but it's categorized now :)
     Info I removed my opposing vote, but there is still nothing about the aeroplane in the categories. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
    Airline category added, aircraft unidentified. Moving to discussion. --Mike Peel 21:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO good enough now. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support --F. Riedelio 09:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor quality due dirty window. --Kallerna 09:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

File:WLE_-_2023_-_Карпатський_Біосферний_Заповідник_-_01_-_світанок_над_Чорногорою.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Dawn over Chornohora, Carpathian Biosphere Reserve, Zakarpattia Oblast, Ukraine. --Moahim 10:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Sky seems too posterised, subject (the mountains) oof. --SHB2000 11:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good to me. The mountains are being viewed after the sun has descended behind them, and the entire view including the sky is quite plausible. -- Ikan Kekek 07:23, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk)

File:Mosque_in_Mokattam,_Cairo.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Mosque interior, Cairo. --Faris knight 08:50, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Maometto97 20:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Perspective correction is needed here to me. --Sebring12Hrs 09:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
    And the middle part is too dark. -- Spurzem 16:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark. --Kallerna 09:21, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

File:চেল_ক্লাব_৪.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Chel club By User:শরদিন্দু ভট্টাচার্য্য --Wasiul Bahar 13:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Tilted. --多多123
    @多多123
    •  Comment tried to fix it, is it ok now?--Wasiul Bahar 20:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 15:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
      •  Neutral It's not tilted anymore, but because it's taken on phone the Level of Detail (LoD) is quite low. I stand neutral on this nomination. --多多123 19:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support It looks OK to me. --Mike Peel 20:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The level of detail is too low for me, and the daytime is unfortunate to photograph this motif, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 19:45, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Categorization could be better but quality is good enough.--Ermell 21:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per PantheraLeo1359531, level of detail too low. --Anil Ö. (talk) 16:56, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose DoF is too shallow, as much of the right side is out of focus. -- Ikan Kekek 07:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)