Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 02 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Liquid_Jaggery.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Liquid Jaggery. --RockyMasum 15:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  SupportGood quality in my opinion and an interesting photo. Nominate to COM:VIC, too, if it's best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek 17:24, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  OpposeThe flash lighting is very distracting here; it casts very harsh shadows. There is something distracting and unexplained in the background. It's hard to find the point of focus in the image; the ladle is out of focus, the liquid in the pot is shadowed. --Lambda 02:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I take it, you oppose; if not, it wouldn't have been necessary to move this to consensual review. However, if you merely meant to comment, delete the oppose vote I noted for you. -- Ikan Kekek 05:57, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Lambda. -- Smial 08:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Ciboire_dans_la_basilique-cathédrale_Notre-Dame_de_Québec_36.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ciboire --Wilfredor 11:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient DoF, sorry --Uoaei1 04:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
     Support Given the conditions I think it’s good enough. --Nefronus 18:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unhappy with noise, DOF, and tight crop. --Smial 10:31, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
It was a dark place and was not possible use tripod there --Wilfredor 01:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too low DOF and too much noise. --Steindy 09:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:56, 1 August 2021 (UTC)