Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 29 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Aurelia_aurita_Atlantis_Aquarium_Madrid_2019.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Aurelia aurita (Moon jellyfish) --Nerve net 08:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Noisy, bad left crop --Poco a poco 08:48, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support I don't mind a crop. --Piotr Bart 20:57, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose Per Poco, too noisy. Tournasol7 21:39, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose per Poco. -- Ikan Kekek 07:59, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 Comment Hi, sorry for the delay, I've uploaded a new version with noise reduction applied. Nerve net 21:23, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 Support Good quality, now. --Zinnmann 22:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   -- Seven Pandas 23:28, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Puente_de_Piedra.002_-_Zamora.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bridge of stone, in Zamora, (León, España). --Drow male 08:19, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Arabsalam 08:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Not sharp enough. --Tournasol7 12:42, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm afraid he's right; it looks like there's been a bit much noise reduction to compensate, but it hasn't quite helped since the details also become washed out.--Peulle 06:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Tournasol7.--Fischer.H 15:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 18:41, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Rifleman_Sanjay_Kumar_statue_at_Param_Yodha_Sthal_Delhi.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rifleman Sanjay Kumar statue. --KCVelaga 04:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Sorry. IMO sharpness should be better. And the resolution should be better for this easy to take photograph. --XRay 07:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO sharpness and resolution are good enough. This is a photograph and not designed to be a Wallpaper in an exhibition of National Geographic. --Arabsalam (talk) 17:43, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - but here it is a photograph wich wants to comply with the QI standards. So by XRay. --PtrQs 22:53, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per XRay. -- Ikan Kekek 08:03, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per XRay.--Fischer.H 15:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 11:50, 28 April 2019 (UTC)