Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 29 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Pylône_électrique_de_type_Chat_400_kv.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Electric pylone --Billy69150 16:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose This image was declined twice at QIC: on 25 Dec 2016 and on 31 Jul 2017. --Basotxerri 18:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done But the corrections were made --Billy69150 19:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Sorry, what changes? There is only one single upload for this file. --Basotxerri 15:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support IMHO ok The Photographer Thu, 26 Apr 2018 01:51:26 GMT
  •  Oppose not enough detail imo. low resolution means the subject is blurry if I hold it up to the same standards as other submissions (200% of monitor). Fix requested in previous declines (geolocation) was never implemented. --Trougnouf 14:37, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 19:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Église_St_Cyr_Menthon_109.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination West facade of Saint Quiricus church in Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon, France. --Chabe01 01:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree - unsharp --Jacek Halicki 08:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --SRD349363 13:55, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Out of focus and halos.--Famberhorst 15:47, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough. --Milseburg 13:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Famberhorst. --Fischer.H 17:48, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very unsharp --Michielverbeek 21:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Neither sharp nor of even sharpness. -- Ikan Kekek 07:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per the others.--Peulle 12:00, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 7 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 19:01, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Yellow_insects_on_yellow_marigold.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Vespidae and eurema blanda (three-spot grass yellow) butterfly on a tagetes lucida (marigold), in Laos --Basile Morin 13:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Gzen92 13:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, failed focus stack - antenna of butterfly is doubled, as is part of the flower border --Exonie 22:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Yes, ✓ Done thanks -- Basile Morin 01:05, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Looks OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 18:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  • {{s}} Nice and QI --Lmbuga 17:13, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose Sorry, antenna of butterfly: See first version of the picture. Last version is not good IMO, but I only realized when I saw the first version--Lmbuga 17:22, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
  • The antennas are now correct. The first version was made using the software Helicon focus (which is more adapted to static shots) and since the butterfly moved a little, then the software interpreted the two images of the same antenna like two different antennas. I have to say I didn't notice this problem at the beginning and thus am grateful to Exonie for their very sharp eyes. Thanks. But since the issue was reported, I took care to inspect much more deeply all the scene with the different pictures. Now the two antennas come from only one single shot, then I can guarantee they're okay. Maybe the left one just a bit blurry, but that's due to the very short DoF of the macro shots -- Basile Morin 00:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks very good to me. --Trougnouf 17:43, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 19:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Heldburg_Heißluftballon_8068379.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Launch preparation for a hot air balloon --Ermell 06:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Oversharpened, scarf blown. Good composition, but sorry, not QI for me. --Yerpo 07:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me --Ercé 09:23, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
    More opinions will be helpful. --Ermell 08:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not the main subject I know, but the man is not in focus. Charlesjsharp 09:57, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The composition doesn't look thought through.--Peulle 10:30, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Slight overexposure, but not really disturbing. IMO very nice composition. --Smial 12:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Why not --Billy69150 16:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Very nice composition. QI for me in spite of it's a bit oversharpened (upper half)--Lmbuga 22:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Oversharpened. --Basotxerri 18:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Michielverbeek 06:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 19:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Inge Keller - Dorotheenstädtischer Friedhof - Mutter Erde fec.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Grave of German actress Inge Keller in Dorotheenstadt cemetery --Mutter Erde 09:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Small photo, but not too small. Stronger colours would have been an improvement. Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:49, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor proposal when taking the image. It's distorted (It needs perspective correction). Not QI IMO--Lmbuga 23:35, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Seems good enough to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Needs perspective correction. --Basotxerri 17:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree, a perspective correction of the base would distort the sculpture excessive and look strange. Its ok as it is. -- DerFussi 17:46, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Distracting perspective, too low resolution for an easy-to-take image, which should have at least 4, better 6 MPix nowadays. --Smial 14:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Per DerFussi --Billy69150 19:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 07:07, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 19:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)