Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 26 2019

• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Forskal's Peristernia, Peristernia forskalii --Llez 04:47, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Part of the Salinas de Fuencaliente, La Palma --Llez 04:47, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:52, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northwestern view of the former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northeastern view of the former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western view of the former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western view of the former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern view of the former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The hamlet of GletschI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Alorin 20:32, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Not very sharp and overexposed parts at the top of the mountains --Llez 04:51, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hôpital - Parc National Ream. --Dmitry Makeev 19:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 19:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pink climbing rose and trellis. --Acabashi 14:10, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good for me. --Rbrechko 15:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porte de ville de Druyes-les-Belles-Fontaines en avril 2019, --Benoît Prieur 13:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:35, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Luca church in Brescia. --Moroder 13:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Rbrechko 13:40, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lion with Crown holding a paintbrush. By User:Sodacan --Piotr Bart 11:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 14:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Nicholas church in Bibrka, Ukraine. --Rbrechko 10:50, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Zamora, Spain. --Drow male 09:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good for me. --Rbrechko 10:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cathedral of Zamora, Spain. --Drow male 09:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male of Anas platyrhynchos (mallard), in the lake of Villafáfila (Zamora, Spain). --Drow male 09:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacking sharpness and detail. Sorry. --Ermell 11:13, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ciconia ciconia (white stork), near the lake of Villafáfila (Zamora, Spain). --Drow male 09:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Strong CA and a lack of sharpness and detail.Sorry. --Ermell 11:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Natural monument “Boniburgbuche” in the Boniburg forest in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 09:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Disturbing halos around the root. Is that fixable? --Ermell 11:21, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
    I don't think so. It's a result of the blue channel. But the halo is very small, isn't it? --XRay 11:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose On the tree stump yes but with the leaves it looks almost like infrared. I put this on reject so that others can have a say. --Ermell 19:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Natural monument “Boniburgbuche” in the Boniburg forest in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 09:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice composition but the left tree has a halo Not QI IMO --Cvmontuy 17:50, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bark of a tree at Boniburg forest in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 09:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Chenspec 20:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common grape hyazinth, location: Swabian Jura --Zinnmann 09:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. But may be better with a little bit more DoF. --XRay 09:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fiat Centoventi Concept at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 09:06, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 14:20, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bentley Continental GT at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 09:06, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too many unsharp areas. --Ermell 19:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Kinheim, Burgstraße 38 --Berthold Werner 08:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination To view this spherical panorama properly, click here --Piotr Bart 08:18, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palazzo Soncini palace in Brescia. --Moroder 07:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 09:29, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palazzo Calzaveglia Brunori palace in Brescia. --Moroder 07:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Please check your image. It looks like color noise, especially at the shadows. --XRay 09:29, 23 April 2019 (UTC)  Comment I guess it's irrelevant --Moroder 10:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support May be you're right. It's a minor issue and can only be seen at full resolution. But you may try to fix it. --XRay 11:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Malek mosque, Kerman, Iran. --Poco a poco 07:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 09:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shah mosque, Tehran, Iran --Poco a poco 07:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Rbrechko 10:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jameh Mosque of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. --Poco a poco 07:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 08:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monkey in the jungle.--Dmitry Makeev 07:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:42, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Risør hotel in April 2019.--Peulle 07:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:42, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Risør aquarium in April 2019.--Peulle 07:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Propeller and axle from the "Pontana" (1911).--Peulle 07:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Myocastor coypus in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 06:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anas platyrhyncho in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 06:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anas platyrhyncho in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 06:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gothic churches in St. Peter bei Freistadt, municipality of Waldburg, Upper Austria --Uoaei1 06:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gothic churches in St. Peter bei Freistadt, municipality of Waldburg, Upper Austria --Uoaei1 06:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cityscape of Wellington from Wellington Harbour, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Again, very small, but ok --Poco a poco 12:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake Wanaka in Otago Region, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Burnett Mountains in Canterbury Region, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake Pukaki in Canterbury Region, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very small but still over the minimum resolution requirement --Poco a poco 12:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shore of Blue River in Mount Aspiring National Park, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW 635 CSI at the SADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 Rally --Ermell 05:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Eatcha 05:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW 502 at the SADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 Rally --Ermell 05:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Eatcha 05:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW 503 Cabriolet at ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 --Ermell 05:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Eatcha 05:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW 528i Alpina at the Sachs Franken Classic Rally 2018 --Ermell 05:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW E9 3.0 CSi at the Sachs Franken Classic 2018 Rally, Stage 1 --Ermell 05:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Goëngarijpsterpoelen (Frysk) Goaiïngarypster Puollen View of the lakes from Heerenzijl. The first rays of sunshine in the morning dispel the mist. and shine on the trees and the reeds.
    --Famberhorst 05:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Motor ship Greate Griene 03800980 of state forest management in Friesland. Send cabin.
    --Famberhorst 05:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Brazilian land snail, Auris melanostoma --Llez 05:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination New lighthouse of Fuencaliente, La Palma --Llez 05:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old lighthouse of Fuencaliente, La Palma --Llez 05:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:50, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lava at the south side of the Volcán de Teneguía, La Palma --Llez 05:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Goëngarijpsterpoelen (Frysk) Goaiïngarypster Puollen View of Goëngarijpsterpoelen.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zwettepoel, (Frysk) Swettepoel. View of the lake and the islands.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Second Lieutenant R R Rane statue. --KCVelaga 04:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 06:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Second Lieutenant Arun Khetarpal statue. --KCVelaga 04:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Sorry, colour noise, unsharp --Llez 05:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naik Jadunath Singh statue. --KCVelaga 04:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Sorry, colour noise, JPG-artefacts, unsharp --Llez 05:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crocus flower.--Peulle 12:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Chenspec 20:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination CLCC Anglican Chapel door. --Acabashi 11:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Can you brighten it a bit? --Poco a poco 11:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
    I'll give it a go when I have a moment, but I'll upload this one again as a separate file as I like its moody mystery. Thanks. Acabashi 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
    Thanks for advising a change. Brightened, increased HDR, and uploaded as larger file. Didn't want to go too far and blow out the highlights. Acabashi 14:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:12, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ciconia ciconia (White stork) in Brugos de Fenar (La Robla, León, Spain). --Drow male 06:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Noise and not sharp sorry --Cvmontuy 18:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Couriot Winding tower, Mine Museum, Saint-Étienne. Panoramic composed of 15 shots. --MirandaAdramin 07:01, 21 April 2019 (UTC)  Comment Barrel distortion, stitching error, lens flare and the running guy is duplicate - lots of repairs to do ;-) --Moroder 08:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
    Thanks for your review, it's done !--MirandaAdramin 14:32, 21 April 2019 (UTC)  Comment I don't thik so --Moroder 23:23, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
    This one maybe ?--MirandaAdramin 08:42, 22 April 2019 (UTC)  Comment Much more logic but there is a small stitching error on the lower line :-( --Moroder 09:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
    I think I got it.--MirandaAdramin 18:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Looks good to me, now. --Zinnmann 09:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Upper Urubamba valley, Cuzco, Peru --Poco a poco 11:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    There some reflections visible. Was that taken through a bus window? --Ermell 19:14, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
    Indeed, it was a train. I've fixed those spots. --Poco a poco 11:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:10, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Spinaloga fortress --C messier 16:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
    Can you add English description into your photos please... --Podzemnik 21:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
    The structure looks to me like it's sinking in the frame. I would have cropped to 16:9 AR, which would raise the fortress and put its top on the upper rule-of-thirds' line. Nice picture though. --Acabashi 00:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gate at Spinaloga --C messier 16:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment Nice quality photo, but others could object to the blurriness above the cornice. It might be wise to crop the top to fractionally above the cornice, and crop the bottom to balance the photo. Added cats to help. Acabashi 21:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clifton, Cape Town seen from the Rocks during a sunset. --Kallerna 12:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    The left side is quite unsharp. May be you could crop that out? --Ermell 13:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose  Not done within a week. --XRay 09:32, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Jan Andolan 2018, near Morena, Madhya Pradesh. --Yann 06:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment The people are tilted CW. Any chance of tilting the pic to the vertical? --Acabashi 10:25, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
     Done Yann 06:21, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crokus in Norway.--Peulle 13:11, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline The flower is too dark. Could you brighten the image a bit? --Cayambe 13:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose  Not done within a week. --XRay 09:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Town hall of Mañón (province of A Coruña, Galicia, Spain). --Drow male 07:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs CA removal and perspective correction. --C messier 17:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Cat_-_blue_eyes.jpg

• Nomination Cat - blue eyes.--Dmitry Makeev 07:35, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:42, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree on this one. It's quite well visible and it's been Photoshoped. I have nothing against Photoshop if it's done in aesthetic and a reasonably way but I don't find any of these qualities here --Podzemnik 09:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Comment I assumed that the picture was taken in an studio (hence that background) as states in the description page --Poco a poco 15:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Photoshop or not, it's not good enough for QI Seven Pandas 22:28, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 23:04, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Commons-Admin-Mop_no.svg

• Nomination An anti logo against Commons Administrators. Icon that typically represents anti administrators work on the Wikimedia Commons. By User:Perhelion --Piotr Bart 13:11, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Too simple for QI. --Peulle 12:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

• Mop isn't that simple IMO. --Piotr Bart 21:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

• I might have agreed if the mop looked good but it doesn't.--Peulle 22:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose per Peulle --MB-one 10:06, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose per others --Smial 12:20, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Derivative works are not QIs, the original Commons logo could become QI, all others based on it with an item attached are not Poco a poco 09:03, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   -- Seven Pandas 22:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Puerto_de_Ventana.003_-_San_Emiliano_(Leon).jpg

• Nomination Picture from Puerto de Ventana, in the limit between Parque Natural Babia y Luna (León) and Parque Natural Las Ubiñas - La Mesa (Asturias), in Spain. --Drow male 08:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose The quality is not very good. You can try to use a smaller aperture next time, I think you'd get better results --Podzemnik 01:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. --Yann 04:52, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support A bit dark but good for QI -- Spurzem 14:59, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Low detail level. Looks like a mobile phone shot.--Peulle 17:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

 Comment Some reviews sound like insults. -- Spurzem 18:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

• Your disagreement likewise. I can't believe you think images with this level of washed out details are QIs for 2018. Shot with a DSC-H400, something must have gone wrong with the processing in these.--Peulle 22:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

• Hi. I have been uploading thousands of photos to Wikimedia Commons for 12 years and now I am checking which of them have enough quality to receive the category of QI, and which ones are not (at this moment I have only 48). I am not a professional photographer (and I do not know how to edit images on the PC). I am aware that I have a lot to learn. If the voters consider that this or other photos are not QI images, I will accept it without any problem. I will try to take better photos in the future, but for the moment I have to check many more photos. --Drow male 15:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Overall underexposed, partially overexposed. Low level details. --Kallerna 05:27, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Puerto_de_Ventana.004_-_San_Emiliano_(Leon).jpg

• Nomination Picture from Puerto de Ventana, in the limit between Parque Natural Babia y Luna (León) and Parque Natural Las Ubiñas - La Mesa (Asturias), in Spain. --Drow male 08:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose The quality is not very good. You can try to use a smaller aperture next time, I think you'd get better results --Podzemnik 01:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. --Yann 04:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Perhaps a bit too dark but good for QI as I think. -- Spurzem 14:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose As with the other photos, the detail is washed out and there are problems with CA as well.--Peulle 22:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:32, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp enough --Michielverbeek 17:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   -- Seven Pandas 22:26, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Puerto_de_Ventana.014_-_San_Emiliano_(Leon).jpg

• Nomination Picture from Puerto de Ventana, in the limit between Parque Natural Babia y Luna (León) and Parque Natural Las Ubiñas - La Mesa (Asturias), in Spain. --Drow male 08:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose The quality is not very good. You can try to use a smaller aperture next time, I think you'd get better results --Podzemnik 01:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. --Yann 04:52, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  strong oppose Not even close. The whole mountain in the centre is unsharp.--Peulle 17:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Perhaps it is not the best image of this mountain but good enough for QI. -- Spurzem 18:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:33, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Church_of_St_Mary_the_Virgin,_Woodnesborough,_Kent_-_churchyard_table_tombs.jpg

• Nomination Church of St Mary the Virgin table tombs. --Acabashi 11:59, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --Websteralive 17:00, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  I disagree. Please upload the full resolution of the photograph. Thank you. --XRay 08:35, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  Enriched. Larger file. Straightened wonky window and wall. Will this do? Thanks. Acabashi 15:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Much better, but IMO the image is leaning in. Please check again. Thank you. --XRay 16:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)::
  I have double checked. It's the table tomb that is leaning as it has subsided on the side facing us. You can see this by the way the moulding at the bottom of the left hand slab and the tomb's top line shoot upwards as they run toward the back toward their own perspective point above the horizon line. These tombs are typically four slabs leant together and held in place by their own weight, by being set inside the top step on a bed of rubble, and also locked by a top slab. They are not rigidly tied together and will settle, or sometimes twist, over time. The step plinth dressing the tomb is in perspective and is upright. Forcing an unnatural vertical on the tomb's left side throws out other parallel verticals. I am loath to do this as it also distorts actuality, unless we believe it is fine to invent something that is not there. Many thanks. Acabashi 18:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support OK. Thank you for your explanation. --XRay 11:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Neutral Please consider less agressive sharpening settings in post processing. --Smial 16:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   -- Seven Pandas 22:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

==

• Nomination Katie Bouman --Eatcha 19:38, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
  Again - what about sources? --Podzemnik 21:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  I added sources that lead to its creation --Eatcha 05:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  I let other folks decide - to me it's too simple to be QI, respectively you vectorised unfree jpg so the licence might be questionable --Podzemnik 21:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 20:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think these vectored photos should become QI. Isn't it bypassing copyright? --Podzemnik 21:32, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Podzemnik --Uoaei1 06:33, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do think that vectorized photographs can become QI. However, this one is, regardless of the copyright concerns, badly executed and doesn't capture the essence of the subject. --MB-one 09:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:38, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Malala_Yousafzai.svg

• Nomination Malala Yousafzai SVG --Eatcha 19:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
  How did you make the picture? We need some sources that you based the image on --Podzemnik 21:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  Added the source --Eatcha 05:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  I let other folks decide - to me it's too simple to be QI, respectively you vectorised unfree jpg so the licence might be questionable --Podzemnik 21:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  The source is not an unfree Image --Eatcha 09:45, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Websteralive 16:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  I disagree. There are several not answered questions. --XRay 16:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 20:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose I diasgree. How did you draw the image? What software did you use? It looks to me like an automatically vectorised JPG image. Apart from my copyright concerns, I don't think the SVG is very good - not enough space on top, blank space at the bottom, weird thing on the left side at the eyes level. Sometimes too detailed (hijab's shadows), sometimes not detailed enough (right eye). --Podzemnik 21:55, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree Podz Seven Pandas (talk) 15:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others --Uoaei1 06:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support considering the low quality source, I think this SVG is well done and shows significant originality. --MB-one 09:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Peulle 14:27, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Comme_des_Garcons_at_the_Met_(62473).jpg

• Nomination The Rei Kawakubo / Comme des Garcons Art of the In-Between show at the Met. By User:Rhododendrites --Yann 06:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Focus is only on the central manikin, which is sharp; the rest is out of focus with some noise. --Acabashi 11:12, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

• I disagree. --Yann 04:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

• See where the wig lines meet the manikins' heads. The front two manikins look out of focus to me. Acabashi 10:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - Good enough quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 15:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- per Ikan -- Eatcha 17:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   -- Seven Pandas 22:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)