Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 19 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Boys_in_Mara_village,_Morena_district.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Boys in Mara village, Morena district, M.P., India. --Yann 12:23, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Lovely picture but unfortunately isn't sharp enough. Focus problem. --Halavar 15:34, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Could I have a second opinion please? --Yann 19:01, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sure, no problem. Everything about this image (composition, lighting etc.) looks good at first glance, but since this is QIC, I must agree with Halavar's point that the sharpness of the main subject is a problem. The DoF is acceptable since it's the boy in the middle who is clearly the subject. The really sad thing is that this shot contains some evocative imagery which could have made it as an FP if the sharpness had been better. --Peulle 08:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 16:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Triceratops Royal Tyrrell (retouched).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Triceratops at the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Paleontology, Canada. --MathKnight 17:57, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad masking, dark borders along some parts of the skeleton, in addition masking artefacts (e.g. see note), colour noise in some darker parts --Llez 14:33, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Llez is right.--Peulle 08:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others -- DerFussi 18:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --DerFussi 18:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Riesling TraubeIMG 8424.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Riesling Traube nach Morgentau - Rheinland-Pfalz - Germany. --Fischer.H 16:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Pretty, but even if the dust spots were removed there's still far too much unsharpness. --Daniel Case 18:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment - I'd vote for it if you remove the dust spots. -- Ikan Kekek 23:47, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 Comment - These are not dust spots but quite simply sunburn on the berry skin, which occurs in strong sunlight .--Fischer.H 09:47, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 Support OK, support per photographer's explanation. -- Ikan Kekek 04:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann 05:34, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Daniel. Nice scene, but I can't find any really sharp spot. Motion blur? Nice composition and lighting, though. --Smial 09:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurred.--Peulle 09:32, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurred. --Basotxerri 19:40, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 16:04, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Lenbachhaus_Munich_Foster_Extension,_March_2018_-2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Lenbachhaus, Munich: wing by Foster and Partners. --Martin Falbisoner 12:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:28, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Obviously QI, but uncropped version is already QI. Charlesjsharp 13:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Question - Is there any rule that you can't crop a photo, creating an appreciably different composition, and then get a QI for the cropped photo? -- Ikan Kekek 23:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Not so long ago, I put a similar case into CR because I was convinced that derivative work couldn't be presented here again (some of us always stated this). However, no one was able to find such a rule in the guidelines, therefore I say  Support. --Basotxerri 15:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Thanks. I will support, too. -- Ikan Kekek 20:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Yann 09:52, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I still hope this QI thing is not a contest, who has the most QI on commons (although I sometimes felt like that). -- DerFussi 10:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Famberhorst 16:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 16:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Punjabi_turbaned_man_-_3.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Punjabi turbaned man --Satdeep Gill 18:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Question The top crop is not so good, can you offer more image? Poco a poco 19:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Pudelek 21:47, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As already stated, the top crop is not QI to me --Poco a poco 19:31, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for a QI. Yann 09:52, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support A while ago such crops where state-of-the-art in portrait photography. So I don't see it as a an issue here. -- DerFussi 10:36, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 22:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 15:59, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Montefringilla_Nivalis_Fink_da_Mont_che_jola_sun_Mastlé_d'inviërn.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Two flying white-winged snowfinches on mount Mastlé in Val Gardena - altitude 2250 mslm --Moroder 05:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, the birds aren't sharp. --Ermell 12:26, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment These are the only pictures of flying finches in their category --Moroder 13:06, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. That's an argument for VIC, though. -- Ikan Kekek 05:34, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Birds not sharp. Try VP. --Smial 09:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Ermell. --Fischer.H 17:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Birds not sharp. --GT1976 01:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree my previous speakers. -- DerFussi 09:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others.--Peulle 09:28, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 7 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 15:58, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Steppe_buzzard_(Buteo_buteo_vulpinus).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Steppe buzzard (Buteo buteo vulpinus), Namibia --Charlesjsharp 08:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Very nice photo, but unfortunately isn't sharp enough. --Halavar 11:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - I think it is. The beak and eye are what really do it for me. -- Ikan Kekek 20:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Halavar. --Fischer.H 17:20, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Quite sharp enough for me. Yann 18:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Per Ikan. --Basotxerri 19:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough for me too. PJDespa 09:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:25, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 15:58, 18 April 2018 (UTC)