Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 18 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Собор_Казанской_божьей_матери.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Cathedral of the Theotokos of Kazan by Rost.galis --Archi38 06:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Perspective problems. jpeg artefacts. lack of sharpness and details. --Cccefalon 08:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
    • For me this perspective is a desired effect wich is positive for the picture -Archi38 15:13, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
      • Please fix narrow gap in sky upper left corner; not properly cropped? --SAplants 19:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
        ✓ Done Archi38 06:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
O.K. now. --SAplants 12:18, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Perspective appeals to me. --SAplants 12:18, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice church. --Be..anyone 09:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 Comment While some users think that a QI photo has to be "nice" or "appealing", I think that they should rather look into the photographic quality. Beside the issues mentioned above there is a posterization in the clouds. So far, posterization is a no-go for QI. --Cccefalon 13:19, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as Cccefalon. --Hubertl 20:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, the church is nice — therefore it deserves a photo of better quality, with better lighting conditions. --A.Savin 20:37, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 18:53, 17 April 2016 (UTC)