Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 17 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Statue "Michael vanquishes Satan" by an unknown artist, Chapel on the Michaelsberg, Untergrombach --Llez 04:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Habe's Nutmeg, Nipponaphera habei --Llez 04:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schokkerhaven. View from the Havenweg over the Ketelmeer.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Schokkerhaven. View from the Havenweg over the Ketelmeer.
-
- Nomination 10-sided cube (pentagonal trapezoid, D10) --XRay 03:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture „Die Widerspenstige“ (Jürgen Ebert, 1996) at the Nieströter Platz in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vischering Castle (with mirror of the info box with a view of the castle) in Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail view of Romanesco broccoli (Brassica oleracea) --XRay 03:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former entrance (interior view) of the Holy Cross chapel (Holy Cross Chapel) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia. Germany --XRay 03:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature park at the Landscape Protection Area on peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 03:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maria Wörth, seen from the gazebo at the peninsula, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pier at Landspitz on peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House “Dr. Kellner” (first ferroconcrete construction in Pörtschach, erected 1910) on Hauptstraße #181, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Demolition of the hotel restaurant „Glocknerhof" on Hauptstrasse #163, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination sphere --Wilfredor 19:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Maybe more black background than necessary, but a nice sharp photo of the lamp. -- Ikan Kekek 21:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Passage du Château --Wilfredor 19:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flock of roe deer near Opatów, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship --Jakubhal 17:46, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, but more zoom would have been better --Michielverbeek 20:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Berg-Kuhschelle im Hausgarten, Rheinland-Pfalz. --Fischer.H 17:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 21:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eastern gray squirrel eating in Central Park --Rhododendrites 17:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Cute and high-quality. Looks like it's eating a walnut. -- Ikan Kekek 21:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ring-billed gull in Red Hook, Brooklyn --Rhododendrites 17:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great blue heron in the Central Park Loch --Rhododendrites 17:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 02:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great blue heron in the Central Park Loch --Rhododendrites 17:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 02:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zbigniew Rokita. By User:R.komorowski --Andrew J.Kurbiko 16:32, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ice packing against the shore in the Drammen fjord.--Peulle 12:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Ice packing against the shore in the Drammen fjord.--Peulle 12:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building on 31, Via Moretto street in Brescia. --Moroder 06:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Abandoned building on 49, Via Moretto street in Brescia. --Moroder 06:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hotel Cumbres und Uferpromenade in Puerto Varas --Ermell 06:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:19, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christ Church in Kirchrimbach --Ermell 06:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Peaceful and nice. -- Ikan Kekek 09:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination War memorial in the church of St.Mauritius in Wiesentheid --Ermell 06:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fair of the Heiligkreuz pilgrimage church on the Kreuzberg in Hallerndorf --Ermell 06:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. -- Ikan Kekek 09:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Put van Nederhorst in the fog. Bushes reflect in the water.
--Famberhorst 06:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Put van Nederhorst in the fog. Bushes reflect in the water.
-
- Nomination Solitary Pinus sylvestris on a rough heathland. Location: Koninklijke Houtvesterij Het Loo.
--Famberhorst 06:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Solitary Pinus sylvestris on a rough heathland. Location: Koninklijke Houtvesterij Het Loo.
-
- Nomination House, Rue Gabriel Péri 34, Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 06:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Theotokos, Chapel on the Michaelsberg, Untergrombach, Germany --Llez 05:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Rock Snail, Tylothais savignyi --Llez 05:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue in the Saint Peter church in Lodeve, Hérault, France. --Tournasol7 05:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the Saint Symphorian church in Gy, Haute-Saône, France. --Tournasol7 05:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Margaret church in Gotha, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the building at Thomaskirchhof 18 in Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Langweerderwielen from the Zandvlakte in the early morning.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination View of Langweerderwielen from the Zandvlakte in the early morning.
-
- Nomination Schokkerhaven. View from the Havenweg on the Pier.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Schokkerhaven. View from the Havenweg on the Pier.
-
- Nomination Anemone ranunculoides in Central Bohemia, Czechia --Nefronus 22:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose For me (personal opinion) too many of the flowers are out of focus. --PsamatheM 16:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
You're right, I might try it better next time. --Nefronus 21:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Spring mood by Vanha Rekolanoja river, Vantaa, Finland --Ximonic 01:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: チューリップに寄ってくるクマバチ. By User:Pcs34560 --NeoMeesje 21:13, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Volvo 7000 on Volvo B7L. By User:(GRAD) --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review
A Few CA in the branches is left. --Ermell 10:51, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Soltan Mosque in Kazan, Tuqai street 14/4, Tatarstan Republic, Russia. --Reda Kerbouche 07:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Tuqai street, house 5A, in Kazan, Tatarstan Republic, Russia --Reda Kerbouche 07:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Jean Debay - Périclés distribuant des couronnes aux artistes - PA00085992 (by Thesupermat) --Sebring12Hrs 16:28, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 04:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bust of Şihabetdin Märcani in Kazan, Russia --Reda Kerbouche 05:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 06:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Egyptian_House,_Zaharievskaya_23,_Saint_Petersburg.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Zaharievskaya, 23 ('Egyptian House') Saint Petersburg, Russia --Reda Kerbouche 10:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Could be sharper, but good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 10:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I disagree. It should be sharper and something went wrong with the perspective. --Tournasol7 05:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Palauenc05 and Tournasol7: Done the image now is sharped and littel correction of the perspective--Reda Kerbouche 07:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, but it can't be sharper without losing quality. I still oppose. --Tournasol7 20:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Palauenc05 and Tournasol7: Done the image now is sharped and littel correction of the perspective--Reda Kerbouche 07:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment First version is sharp enough. Perspective is acceptable, but there is some pincushion distortion. Second version looks oversharpened, but still has pincushion distortion. --Smial 10:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I like this photo, but I think it's not quite sharp enough for QI. I'd welcome more opinions. -- Ikan Kekek 05:36, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp --Trougnouf 09:08, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Trougnouf 09:08, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Statue_in_Jardins_de_la_Fontaine_in_Nimes_05.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:10, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Blurred in the left quarter. --F. Riedelio 09:39, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The main object is in focus. --Tournasol7 19:39, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support The subject seems sharp to me, and the soft lighting is good. --Lion-hearted85 00:07, 13 April 2021
- Support per Lion-hearted85. It's OK for the background to be blurred. -- Ikan Kekek 05:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Perfect DoF control. --LexKurochkin 07:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Lion-hearted85 and Ikan. --Smial 10:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Haardt_an_der_Weinstraße_Mandelring_7_005_2020_09_14.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Former winemaking cooperative in Haardt an der Weinstraße --F. Riedelio 14:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Out of focus, chromatic aberration --Wilfredor 15:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- New version CA removed. The object is sharp enough for me. --F. Riedelio 06:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment OK to me. Is this the maximum size? -- Ikan Kekek 06:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- New version Maximum size. --F. Riedelio 12:05, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Thanks. I find this OK. -- Ikan Kekek 07:49, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support QI support. PsamatheM 14:41, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good now. --Aristeas 14:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Weak support the cars are unfortunate, but including more of them would throw the composition off. good for QI Rhododendrites 12:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Common_pigeon_(Columba_livia)_in_Moscow,_Russia_on_2021_April_04_(0139).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Common pigeon (Columba livia) in Moscow, Russia --LexKurochkin 13:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Bird's head and part of body is in shadow and thus not clear --PsamatheM 16:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree, the head is clearly visible with good level of detail. --LexKurochkin 16:09, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose it is a poorly composed image --Charlesjsharp 18:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good enough, IMO, but do understand that because rock pigeons are so common and so comfortable around people, most reviewers understandably have much higher standards for photos of them than of scarcer or more timid birds. -- Ikan Kekek 03:43, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I see, and there is no problem with this approach. And you are right, it was a shot of opportunity. I went to photograph a church, but this pigeon came so close, that I was seduced to take the photo. As you can see, the line of sight is nearly vertical, it was near my feet. I never had a chance to photograph a bird like this. --LexKurochkin 18:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support The composition is not ideal, but Commons has need of top-down shots like this too. The shadow is a bit disturbing, but otherwise I'm not seeing a huge problem with the sharpness; many photos of similar quality have been promoted before. --Peulle 09:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose not good enough for such an easy targer, bad composition overall. --Kallerna 16:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charlesjsharp and PsamatheM - --GRDN711 15:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Face_of_Horse_in_Manno_(Switzerland)_4.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Face of Horse in Manno (Switzerland) --Commonists 18:43, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Sorry: disturbing bar in the face. --F. Riedelio 07:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment For me isn't disturbing, can we discuss it? --Commonists 14:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support OK for me, the head of the horse is VERY sharp, overall composition with the bar is not outstanding but still OK for me. --Tuxyso 09:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per F. Riedelio. --Fischer.H 16:26, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Commonists: My daughter saw this photo on my monitor and immediately asked me to send her the link. Now it is "useful & used" as a background image in my daughter's smartphone. Thank you! :) --LexKurochkin 17:22, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- @LexKurochkin: Welcome --Commonists 18:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Weak support Well... Considering my previous comment, I am not an independent reviewer in this particular case, but nevertheless this is my opinion. IMO the horse face is sharp and the bar above it is not really disturbing. On the other hand I am slightly surprised that nobody mentioned the noise in out of focus areas and the noise looks like the image was slightly oversharpened. Considering the image size this problem is not critical. I think also that wide-angle lens made the horse body looking rather unnatural, but it is not prohibited by the QI guidelines. All in all, I think the image is not perfect, but good enough for QI. --LexKurochkin 11:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, the composition/arrangement doesn't convince me to step over the QI bar. --Milseburg 17:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment No problem Milseburg, Criticism is the salt of Democracy. Regards. --Commonists 20:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Sharp eye and not cropped, I think that's good enough for QI. The perspective is a bit awkward but it doesn't need to be as straight with this subject and horses are weird to photograph since they are so long and either come way too close or ignore humans from far away. --Trougnouf 14:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good enough per others, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 16:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose bad crop, dull light, overall quality - should not be cherished with QI-badge. --Kallerna 16:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Do photos need brilliant light to be images of quality? This is not FPC, and I think we need quality images in dull light as well as resplendent light. All this is without prejudice to your other remarks. -- Ikan Kekek 05:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not the only reason why it should not be a QI, but one of them. --Kallerna 09:12, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Like the horse but agree with Milseburg. --GRDN711 15:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)