Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 06 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination LVM Insurance in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination LVM Insurance in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Malbazar Tourist Lodge, Mal Bazar, West Bengal, India --Bgag 00:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tricycle in Mal Bazar, West Bengal, India --Bgag 00:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women harvesting tea, West Bengal, India --Bgag 00:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women harvesting tea, West Bengal, India --Bgag 00:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zang Dhok Palri Phodang, Kalimpong, India --Bgag 00:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former beehive hut on Quellweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 00:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window and ladder at the former beehive hut on Quellweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 00:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Disused farmstead «Gimplhof» on Quellweg #38 at Winklerner Alm, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 00:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Disused farmstead «Gimplhof» on Quellweg #38 at Winklerner Alm, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 00:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grange «vulgo Ostermann» on Brockweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 00:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lesser periwinkle (Vinca minor) -- George Chernilevsky 20:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 20:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pine plank fence -- George Chernilevsky 20:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:36, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz W198 300 SL Gullwing in Geneva--Alexander-93 20:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:52, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carved ceiling at the Ranakpur Jain Temple --Eatcha 20:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose - Insufficient detail. -- Ikan Kekek 21:00, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wulfenia (Wulfenia carinthiaca) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:01, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Düsseldorf-NRW, tower (the Rheinturm), bridge (the Hafenbrücke), other bridge (the Rheinkniebrücke) und modern building (the Neue Zollhof) --Michielverbeek 17:50, 3 April 2019 (UTC)\
Support Good quality. --XRay 18:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Düsseldorf-NRW, tower (the Rheinturm), bridge (the Hafenbrücke), other bridge (the Rheinkniebrücke) und modern building (the Neue Zollhof) --Michielverbeek 17:50, 3 April 2019 (UTC)\
-
- Nomination Düsseldorf-NRW, tram stop the Speditionstrasse --Michielverbeek 17:50, 3 April 2019 (UTC)\
Support Good quality. --XRay 18:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Düsseldorf-NRW, tram stop the Speditionstrasse --Michielverbeek 17:50, 3 April 2019 (UTC)\
-
- Nomination Kruja Castle, Kruja, Albania --Poco a poco 13:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 15:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rozafa Castle, Shkodra, Albania --Poco a poco 13:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cathedral of Christ's Resurrection, Tirana, Albania --Poco a poco 13:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 15:08, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moussier's redstart (Phoenicurus moussieri) male, Toubkal --Charlesjsharp 11:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Low detail compared to other today's nominations. --Smial 13:04, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crested lark (Galerida cristata kleinschmidti), Near Asni --Charlesjsharp 11:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grey wagtail (Motacilla cinerea cinerea), Paradise Valley --Charlesjsharp 11:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Addax (Addax nasomaculatus) young adult, Souss-Massa --Charlesjsharp 11:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Felis silvestris catus (cat) in A Coruña, Galicia, Spain. --Drow male 08:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline bits cropeed off Charlesjsharp 11:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arctotheca calendula in A Coruña, Galicia, Spain. --Drow male 08:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Insufficient quality. Too small; less than 2 MP. --Tournasol7 13:39, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Columba palumbus (pidgeon) in A Coruña, Galicia, Spain. --Drow male 08:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline very poor technically Charlesjsharp 11:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Resting cat, La Palma, Canary Islands --Llez 08:12, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Cute, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination eggs of black heron - Oeufs de Aigrette ardoisée --Ercé 06:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Franz Josef Glacier in Westland National Park, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Government Gardens in Rotorua, Bay of Plenty Region, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hahei Beach Road in Hahei in Waikato Region, North Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:03, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Right turn road sign with 35 km/h speed limit near Tairua in Waikato Region, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:52, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake Tekapo in Canterbury Region, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- PtrQs 08:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination bell tower on the cemetery in Akmarijp
--Famberhorst 06:02, 3 April 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Comment Image quality is good but IMO bell chair is not a good translation. I would consider belfry or bell tower. --AStiasny 15:07, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 15:39, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --AStiasny 17:35, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination bell tower on the cemetery in Akmarijp
-
- Nomination Ballingbuer at Goingarijp. Tree stump on the waterfront of the Lijkvaart.
--Famberhorst 06:02, 3 April 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Ballingbuer at Goingarijp. Tree stump on the waterfront of the Lijkvaart.
-
- Nomination Fulu Pickup --Ermell 05:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination MG TD at the Sachs Franken Classic 2018 Rally, 2st stage --Ermell 05:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz 220 SE b Cabriolet (W 111C) at ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 --Ermell 05:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Opel Commodore A Coupé at ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 --Ermell 05:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The former gatehouse of Brünninghausen Castle in Dortmund, Germany, on a crisp winter day. --Máel Milscothach 18:26, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AStiasny 07:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Duisburg-NRW, marina in inland port --Michielverbeek 21:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion SupportGood quality. --Eatcha 05:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Comment I can not believe that the given time is right. --Milseburg 12:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment What time are you talking about ? The time in the EXIF or any other time, what's wrong in it ? --Eatcha 18:55, 2 April 2019 (UTC) Comment 23:57:39 is given in the description and was taken from EXIF-Data, I think. The image was definetly not taken on midnight. I propose to eliminate the wrong time from the description and correct the camera´s time. This applies to all images of the Duisburg series. --Milseburg 14:21, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment 23:57:39 is File change(it's edited in the mid night) time not the time at which it's generated (it's 12:31, 22 March 2019 from exif). And Yes you're right it's taken from EXIF, but why did it(mediawiki) picked up the wrong time ? --Eatcha 20:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thanks, you are right and I have Done changed all times --Michielverbeek 20:50, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dolmen in Castle of San Antón, A Coruña (Spain). --Drow male 16:05, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Please, fix the categories, that's no castle --Poco a poco 17:05, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Actually this artificial dolmen is in the uncovered part of the castle.--Drow male 19:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC). I fixed the category.--Drow male 18:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:00, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kantartzis mansion, Portaria --C messier 18:59, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Review
There's a green dust spot on the balcony and a yellow one on the tree below. Also there's litte chromatic aberration on the wall right next to the stairways and a purple spot in the tree beneath. The floodlights on the wall are too dazzling, maybe it's possible to darken them up a bit --Der Angemeldete 00:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Shield in the main door of Military Naval School of Marín (Pontevedra, Spain).--Drow male 20:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Aurus Senat Limousine at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 07:59, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ten-lined June beetle July 26 2017 (2) --Alex of Canada 05:42, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Review
Categories missing (also applies to the othe animal images) --MB-one 08:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the comment, I totally forgot, added some categories to my pictures. Alex of Canada 08:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Squirrel September 16 2017 --Alex of Canada 05:41, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Review
Aahh ... so cute and aahh...so vague categorized --Der Angemeldete 14:52, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:GIMS_2019,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(GIMS1069).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Techart GrandGT Supreme at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 08:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:55, 2 April 2019
- Oppose Photographing cars in exhibitions or museums is sometimes difficult. On the Porsche are too many small reflections and the ground is too bright. Please let us hear other opinions on the photo. -- Spurzem 19:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC) (UTC)
- Comment Will try to fix the ground, but I don't think the reflections are that problematic. --MB-one 08:13, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose This is indeed very problematic. The shape of the car is nearly invisible due to the many kinds of reflections on the car. Technically the image is perfect, but visually it is not a QI. --Granada 06:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Noise, lighting, low DOF, disturbing background. --Smial 12:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Basotxerri 16:55, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Audi_S4_(20100325-DSC01393).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Audi S4 (B6) at National Mall, Washington, D.C. --MB-one 08:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:01, 2 April 2019
- Oppose The image is a bit too bright for me with too less contrast. But above all, the light was unfavorable to photograph the car. The side windows to the rear window look milky. In my opinion, it is not a picture of good quality. I ask to discuss. -- Spurzem 19:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Good enough, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 06:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Steenbras_River_Gorge_1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination One of the "crystal pools" in Steenbras River Gorge. --Kallerna 04:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Eatcha 05:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose disagree. Looks downscaled to appear a better quality. --Milseburg 13:49, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - Comparing the first version and the second version, I have to agree with Milseburg. Ikan Kekek 06:50, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Mercedes-Benz_CLK_270_CDi_en_Valencia.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Mercedes-Benz CLK 270 CDI in Valencia, Spain --Dorieo 12:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:32, 31 March 2019
- Oppose The car is much too bright. No quality image for me. Please discuss -- Spurzem 20:49, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposed and not centered.--Ermell 06:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
File:ContecRail_Køf_T51_pic1.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Photographed near Koge train station, Denmark. By User:Alfvanbeem --Piotr Bart 13:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Seven Pandas 13:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Type of engine would be very useful --Ermell 14:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support The file name indicates – if I understand right – that it is a small locomotive with oil firing (Diesel engine) and fluid transmission of the Danish railway company Contec Rail. The photo is impeccable and therefore for me a quality image that can be quite useful in a Wikipedia article. -- Spurzem 13:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support OK for me. --Bgag 00:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:54, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Torre_de_Hércules.601_-_A_Coruña.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Torre de Hércules, A Coruña (Spain).--Drow male 18:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Eatcha 18:53, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Sky noisy and shadows blotchy cause of too much post processing. --PtrQs 00:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Sky is way too noisy. --MB-one 09:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Beach_handball_at_the_2018_Summer_Youth_Olympics_–_Girls_Preliminary_Round_–_CRO-ASA_071.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Beach handball at the 2018 Summer Youth Olympics at 10 October 2018 – Girls Preliminary Round Group A – Croatia-American Samoa 2:0. By Marcus Cyron --Piotr Bart 17:32, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Eatcha 18:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose missing focus, chromatic noise --PtrQs 00:31, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - Poor composition, IMO, with bad crop on the right. -- Ikan Kekek 07:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the right moment to take a picture. Both girls are looking to the right and I have got no idea what is interesting about this. --Michielverbeek 08:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Neutral -- The picture is something of a not so well-done souvenir photo of a sports event but not a picture of quality. Especially the girls in the backlight are too dark. But I do not want to give a judgment, because otherwise it would be too easy to be seen as revenge. -- Spurzem 12:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, I really rare decline an image because of composition, but as for Michielverbeek: Oppose --Smial 18:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle 18:19, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor composition --Moroder 16:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Smial. Lighting and sharpness are actually fine for an action shot. --MB-one 09:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Triangle_file.486.png
[edit]- Nomination Big triangleI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Websterdead 16:46, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Opposereally ? Are you serious about this ? There are probably thousands of these types of shapes available on commons, I do not think a single of them is QI. What's special special in this triangle ? I do not know on what grounds should I decline it, but I will never support these types of shapes for QI. Sorry -- Eatcha 17:27, 29 March 2019 (UTC)- Oppose It is just a triangle. --Piotr Bart 17:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment For declining a picture please cite a reason referred to in the QI Guidlines. Otherwise leave it to others to review it. Every picture - even those you estimate trivial or odd - deserves a fair review. --PtrQs 00:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - I've seen non-photographic images declined before as too simple. Why would it be a problem to decline this one? -- Ikan Kekek 07:26, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I did not state that I think this triangle a QI, but declining an image should contain some information about the reasons for this step. And I guess that ranting about do not know on what grounds should I decline it does not give the photographer any chance to improve his future images. -- PtrQs 13:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - In this case, it's not an issue of improving this kind of image, but that this is such a simple geometric figure that the level of skill involved in creating it is so low that it doesn't really merit QI consideration. -- Ikan Kekek 04:44, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I did not state that I think this triangle a QI, but declining an image should contain some information about the reasons for this step. And I guess that ranting about do not know on what grounds should I decline it does not give the photographer any chance to improve his future images. -- PtrQs 13:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- I never declined it, as I told above do not know on what grounds should I decline it, but it's an error while adjusting the comments. SEE User:Eatcha/diff -- EATCHA (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose as Ikan says, it´s to simple, I think. If there is no specific guideline for such images, it doesn´t mean it is automatically a QI. Btw. description and categories could be more precize. It´s a special type of triangle, not simply "big". --Milseburg 19:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - Too simple. -- Ikan Kekek 04:44, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Too simple a shape to reach QI status. --Peulle 18:18, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose rasterized image of a simple geometric shape is not good quality. --MB-one 09:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)