Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 04 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Shot_of_a_cat_sitting_on_the_pavement.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Shot of a cat sitting on the pavement (Czech Republic). --Adámoz 08:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Distracting back- and foreground, cat is looking the wrong way. --Kallerna 09:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Kallerna --Milseburg 10:34, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Margherita_pratolina_bellis_perennis.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bellis perennis is the daisy or daisy that we encounter in our lawns or that we grow in our gardens and marks the beginning of spring--PROPOLI87 12:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Sharpness is not the best but I like the composition. -- Spurzem 10:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I think this is not sharp enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 10:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree. The bar for flower images is certainly higher than this nowadays.--Peulle 17:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Mareca_strepera_-_Lynde_Shores.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Female gadwall (Mareca strepera), Whitby, Ontario, Canada. --The Cosmonaut 01:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. A small resolution and IMO unsharp and too dark. --XRay 04:42, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done: brightened. --The Cosmonaut 20:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Too unsharp/noisy/dark. -- Ikan Kekek 05:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Tropical_Islands_Halbe_22.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rainforest Camp, Tropical Islands, Halbe. --Kallerna 10:06, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose not sharp enough to me --Carschten 18:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I would like to hear another opinion. In those light conditions, in a place where using of tripod is not possible, the sharpness should be ok considering the image size. I quite enjoy the view. --Kallerna 05:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support sharpness seems fine to me. --MB-one 09:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --Smial 12:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Interesting and good -- Spurzem 17:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. Well-done for the light conditions. -- Ikan Kekek 22:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I'm not wild about the scene (mostly the dark, unlit tops of trees) but it does show the camp, and the tropical theme, and to my eye it seems sharp enough with low enough noise. --Bobulous 19:58, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 23:21, 3 April 2020 (UTC)