Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Category:Images released under the CC BY 3.0 license by Statens Museum for Kunst

Set Images released under the CC BY 3.0 license by Statens Museum for Kunst, not featured

This is a complete set of images released under the CC BY 3.0 license by Statens Museum for Kunst.

While there's no actual templates for a set nomination, so feel free to tweak this page. Here is a selection of the 158 images: Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2012 at 17:02:10 (UTC)

• 
  Queen Dowager Juliane Marie
• 
  Asiatisk Compagnis bygninger, set fra St. Annæ Gade
• 
  Dansk landskab
• 
  Bortførelse på en enhjørning
• 
  En jysk fårehyrde på heden
• 
  Et selskab af danske kunstnere i Rom
• 
  Hoved af en armbrøstskytte
• 
  Kain dræber Abel
• 
  Kristus som den lidende frelser
• 
  Lige børn leger bedst (Gelyck By Gelyck)
• 
  Paris' dom
• 
  Salomons dom
• 
  Santa Corona
• 
  Susanna and the Elders
• 
  Trompe l'oeil. Bagsiden af et indrammet maleri
• 
  Tulipa gesneriana (Gottorfer Codex)

•  Info created by different people - mustly uploaded by Villy Fink Isaksen - nominated by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Nothing to do with the quality of the pictures, I just don't find that the link connecting these images (a license from a museum) justifies the constitution of a FPC set. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Undermining of PD-Art. Regards, Peter Weis (talk) 18:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
  • The thing is, PD-Art isn't actually law in most countries. Wikipedia is arguably acting as an agent provocateur, using the fact it cannot be sued due to America's laws to encourage other places to come up with similar rules. The CC-licence protects the reusers far more than Wikipedia's usual policy of encouraging people to risk getting sued. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:21, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support - This set consists of carefully selected highlights from a major European museum, and the quality of both the artworks and the images speaks for itself. --Urbandweller (talk) 21:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Info Please read the section of the guidelines at the top of this page, dealing with set nominations and starting with the phrase: If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set (the bold is mine). That is obvioulsy not the case of this group. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I don't think we can feature an entire category of images at once, though I do think that they'd be great to nominate. Also, there is a template for set nominations (though it's probably only available in English at the moment - it's quite new. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Alvesgaspar --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:54, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose I really don't like featuring an entire category, either: can (at least some of) these images be nominated individually instead? Michael Barera (talk) 03:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Alvesgaspar -- Joydeep _Talk 05:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Alvesgaspar. Not a good way for the new "FPC sets" (a good idea), IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Béria Lima ^msg 22:05, 22 December 2012 (UTC)