Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Farmers Maket 1947 Oak Ridge.jpg

Image:Farmers Maket 1947 Oak Ridge.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2017 at 20:37:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/Image:Farmers Maket 1947 Oak Ridge.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Farmers Maket 1947 Oak Ridge.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info created by Ed Westcott for the US Department of Energy Oak Ridge, uploaded and nominated by TheAmerikaner -- TheAmerikaner (talk) 20:37, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- TheAmerikaner (talk) 20:37, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - Please help me with this one. It's unusual to see such a big panorama from that long ago, and it stands as a historical document, but I'm not finding the view all that interesting. I feel like I must be missing something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support The whites and blacks provide a good amount of contrast, and the clouds help as well. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:44, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. Technical quality not great, with smudged areas indicating problems with scan or clumsy retouching. -- Colin (talk) 17:04, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 19:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose While it is a good documentation of a sleepy little town in a bygone era, I don't find the picture or the quality wow-y enough for FP. --cart-Talk 09:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Milseburg (talk) 13:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
  • @Milseburg: You have to give a reasonable explanation when opposing. Thanks. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I agree with Colin and W.carter. --Milseburg (talk) 18:36, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Support High resolution. Nice view. And there aren't other good images like that. --Juicebable (talk) 07:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Historical document of high quality. It would like a version with less wires, but otherwise nothing to say. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I see reasons for VI but not for FP. --Milseburg (talk) 18:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others and my remarks above. Ultimately, I agree with Milseburg. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:50, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Jee 02:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)