Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Walking through a lot of rainstorms.svg

File:Walking through a lot of rainstorms.svg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2015 at 02:22:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Walking through a lot of rainstorms.svg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Walking through a lot of rainstorms.svg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated
•  Info A bit different from what I usually nominate but I think it’s a nice example of an SVG vector painting. All by Kelvinsong—♥ Kelvinsong talk 02:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support—♥ Kelvinsong talk 02:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice drawing, I like this colors and composition but bezier curve is a bit carelessly especially arms and shoulders plus insufficient wow for me. --Laitche (talk) 07:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Idk it’s kinda the style of the image—♥ Kelvinsong talk 13:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Info When I try opening the file in Firefox (35.0.1 on Linux Mint), I only get a parsing error (unclosed token) in line 3990, column 5. --El Grafo (talk) 12:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  • I could open it(svg) in Firefox (37.0.2) but Windows not Linux. I saw the bezier curve in Adobe Illustrator CC. --Laitche (talk) 12:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Works for me in Firefox on Ubuntu 15.04—♥ Kelvinsong talk 13:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Mmmh, I'm getting the same error with Firefox 37.0.1 on an older Ubuntu LTS. It starts to draw some elements and then aborts. W3 validator shows another error plus 2 warnings, but nt this one. --El Grafo (talk) 11:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral beautiful, however, background and foreground could have more contrast --The Photographer (talk) 11:20, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
•  weak support I'm already having problems judging digital reproductions of "real" paintings, and this being original artwork doesn't make it easier at all. It's easier with your biological drawings, as one can try to judge them by their accuracy etc., but here I'm lacking criteria besides renders well/has no syntax errors and do I like it?. Well' the error(s) don't seem to be severe and I do like it, so … --El Grafo (talk) 11:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 08:33, 19 May 2015 (UTC)