Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Various grains.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Various grains.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2015 at 10:29:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
Info created by Peggy Greb, USDA ARS - uploaded by Thuresson - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 10:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Kasir (talk) 10:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Comment Random composition IMO. The crops are not good.--Jebulon (talk) 11:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Composition and blown highlights. --Cayambe (talk) 12:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Per Jebulon. Daniel Case (talk) 16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose good composition and i see no blown out highlights but unsharp bread in background. --Ralf Roleček 16:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose per Ralf. --Tremonist (talk) 12:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, Because of too many opposers with various rationals now, without any other support than the one of the nominator.--Jebulon (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Question Is it ok? I think FPX is also a vote so this FPX is double vote or not? --Laitche (talk) 02:33, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Two completely different things. This is not a vote, but a finding. Additionaly, nobody can strike my oppose vote except me, but everybody can strike the FPX with a support vote.--Jebulon (talk) 09:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: But now, we have double votes. Please fix this. Yann (talk) 12:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Done--Jebulon (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: But now, we have double votes. Please fix this. Yann (talk) 12:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Two completely different things. This is not a vote, but a finding. Additionaly, nobody can strike my oppose vote except me, but everybody can strike the FPX with a support vote.--Jebulon (talk) 09:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Very weak support a bit lack of sharpness and cut off the subject is no good but good proportion. --Laitche (talk) 09:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results: