Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:USDnotes.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:USDnotes.png, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2012 at 04:57:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Andyhi18, modified by Hidro - uploaded by Hidro - nominated by Dipankan001 -- Dipankan001 (talk) 04:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Dipankan001 (talk) 04:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Support Very good. Please send a couple of these... ;o) Yann (talk) 05:07, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 09:22, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:51, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Very useful image, but a bunch of notes provide no "wow" to me. What next? A bunch of Euro notes perhaps... --Jovian Eye storm 21:37, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Support - I'm cool with this. --Claritas (talk) 19:07, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Neutral I agree there is no wow, but I think this kind of works are useful to Wikipedia and should be supported. The image has good quality, nice EV, colors look OK. What I don't like is that the reverse part of the banknotes is not shown. Also minor issues like tilt on some notes, and the 10 dollar bill not being as sharp as the others. --Paolo Costa (talk) 16:45, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Useful but I can't see a FP star shining here • Richard • [®] • 18:25, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Oppose per others. -- -donald- (talk) 12:22, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Oppose --Claus (talk) 17:16, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Composition is straight out of a scanner. This can be recreated in 5 seconds provided you have $188. Composition matters. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 00:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Oppose I'd consider this if it was a set nom of higher-res individual notes with both sides shown. As others have pointed out the $10 is not sharp enough. --99of9 (talk) 13:14, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting but not FP for me --Herby talk thyme 17:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 16 April 2012 (UTC)