Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trappe til nordre ringgade.jpg

File:Trappe til nordre ringgade.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2022 at 10:26:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Trappe til nordre ringgade.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trappe til nordre ringgade.jpg

395

371

4583

2611

5169

3832

crop suggestion --Kreuzschnabel 15:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Denmark
•  Info created & uploaded by Villy Fink Isaksen - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support - Thanks to Tomer T! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 12:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks like entrance into public free toilets. Nothing for FP nomination here at all, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 14:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I really like the symmetry and how the picture captures what I imagine was the intention of the architect - the play of forms and light. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Per Kritzolina. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 06:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Detail resolution could be better, but the composition is good, as explained by Kritzolina. Even if this really was the entrance into public free toilets, this would not reduce the value of the form. In general, it is more difficult to create good photos of ordinary or nasty things; everybody can take a nice photo of a beautiful flower, but it needs artistic skills to photograph the ugly and boring in an appealing way. --Aristeas (talk) 06:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I have nothing to add to the above comments --El Grafo (talk) 07:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good job Poco a poco (talk) 12:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not interesting to me. Well-done, sure, but nothing incredible to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good idea and nicely done. The uninteresting foreground is too dominant though IMHO. Crop suggestion added (on nomination page), that might make it more appealing. --Kreuzschnabel 15:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Good suggestion. No promises, but I'd definitely reconsider if that crop were made. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment If you apply the suggested crop, please upload the cropped file under a new name and offer it here as an alternative – the crop is very interesting, but it certainly changes the effect of the photo, therefore please don’t just replace the original version with it. --Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

  Uploaded a cropped version. Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

•  CommentI feel this new crop is way too tight, the first version was a lot better - *sigh* now we do have a problem, I don't really want to withdraw my support for the original image, but can't really support this one ... --Kritzolina (talk) 19:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

  I have a problem with undoing the cropped version - please help me. Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

• Reverted. --Kreuzschnabel 22:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Personally, I prefer the original version. The front space, in my humble opinion, gives the picture more room to grow. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
• @Villy Fink Isaksen: : I’d suggest to withdraw this nomination and place another one with the two versions as a set, so we’ll get a clear voting. Winning this one (as it seems) might keep you from nominating the other crop. --Kreuzschnabel 08:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

  I'm happy with this one.. Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 08:59, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 12:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support A soothing architectural abstraction. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Looks good to me even though you could've removed the white wipe.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Many bricks converging in an interesting way, but the disgusting yellow drippings at the top of the wall repel me -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose distracting foreground --Lupe (talk) 18:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Denmark