Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Torre Pelli abril 2015.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Torre Pelli abril 2015.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 May 2015 at 19:58:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz
Neutral as creator-- Gzzz (talk) 19:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment no judgement for the time beeing, its tilted clockwise.. --Hubertl (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment Leans a little to the right? --Tremonist (talk) 12:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Info It's a side view of the tower. As you can see it better on this picture, taken from the same side, the back is more vertical than the front. On my picture, if you look at the middle column of windows, it's (in my opinion) not tilted at all : I checked it with Photoshop and Lightroom... Gzzz (talk) 19:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Support Nice light and colours. --Code (talk) 19:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Support as File:Parque Avenida Building in Paulista Avenue.jpg. What a building! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:28, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Neutral yellow van disturb, D kuba (talk) 07:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Question Do you want me to make it grey ? Gzzz (talk) 20:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- You can remove this van, i guess, but i like natural images, not those being result of photoshop works or other computer retouch, which is very common here on commons, coincidentally:-). D kuba (talk) 11:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:13, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Support Poco2 15:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Info That can be seen on the Google Maps from nearby this camera location. --Laitche (talk) 09:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Oppose This is a good qi, but the distractions and obstructions on the ground together with the simple composition keep this below FP level in my opinion. — Julian H.✈ 11:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment I think the perspective correcting of this nomination is not enough, it looks similar this angle. When compared with this one, please see lampposts, trees and buildings of both images, that's the reason I think it's not enough. --Laitche (talk) 16:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Oppose per Julian. --El Grafo (talk) 13:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Oppose per Julian. -- Colin (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]Comment Perspective correcting, Composition adjustment, Rotated counterclockwise 0.3 degrees. @Gzzz: If you mind, I will withdraw the alternative. --Laitche (talk) 20:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Abstain as editor. --Laitche (talk) 20:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Support No problem for me ! I like it ! -- Gzzz (talk) 20:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Support per Gzzz. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Oppose per Julian. -- Colin (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results: