Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tiefenellern Ellernbach Schlucht 17RM1588-PSD.jpg

File:Tiefenellern Ellernbach Schlucht 17RM1588-PSD.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2017 at 07:31:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tiefenellern Ellernbach Schlucht 17RM1588-PSD.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tiefenellern Ellernbach Schlucht 17RM1588-PSD.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany
•  Info Not very powerful at that time of the year but this shows the lack of water in this karstic landscape. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 07:31, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ermell (talk) 07:31, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 10:56, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Dark, but that makes it more tranquil. Daniel Case (talk) 15:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per Daniel --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:31, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:33, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Very good! --Basotxerri (talk) 19:52, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose The scene is great but those burnt areas are just too distracting. That was IMHO not managed properly, sorry --Poco² 21:55, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Tried to eliminate the burnt areas and increased the the dark parts a bit.--Ermell (talk) 08:22, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
    • I'm afraid that there is nothing you can do about it, they are gone. --Poco² 10:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support and 7...--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--fedaro (talk) 21:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose per Poco. The whites are completely lost, and as a result the edges between the white and non-white parts look unnatural. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
• Mild  Oppose - None of the water looks really like water to me, and the super-bright white water that the opposers are complaining about is kind of weird-looking. I was on the fence, but I guess I feel like for FP, this could probably be done better, though that might require a trip at another time of day or in less direct sunlight. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment For this shot I used a 1000 ND filter to achieve an exposure time of one minute, so the water probably doesn't look realistic but this was intended. The side light from the left is good to illuminate the small island but the difference to the rest of the darker upper part is maybe not strong enough. According to the histogram, the highlights have not disappeared, you just can't see them anymore, which probably comes out the same way.--Ermell (talk) 21:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

  Ermell: what you needed here, apart from the ND filter, was a HDR Poco² 07:59, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Poc That's what I'm gonna try next but with the expected exposure times it should be completely windless. I also hope that next time there will be more water coming down, my waders are long enough.--Ermell (talk) 08:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Tranquil. --cart-Talk 08:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 14:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:54, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 17:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany