Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Three women tiredly look at Antoin Sevruguin as he photographs them in the late 19th century..jpeg

File:Three women tiredly look at Antoin Sevruguin as he photographs them in the late 19th century..jpeg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2015 at 12:22:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Three women tiredly look at Antoin Sevruguin as he photographs them in the late 19th century..jpeg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Three women tiredly look at Antoin Sevruguin as he photographs them in the late 19th century..jpeg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info Three women tiredly look at Antoin Sevruguin as he photographs them in the late 19th century, created by Antoin Sevruguin - uploaded by Alborzagros - nominated by Mirrys -- Mirrys (talk) 12:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mirrys (talk) 12:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --High quality and as up-loader. Alborzagros (talk) 13:33, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting, but quality is not there. Yann (talk) 14:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Info The original file at the source website doesn't show the pixelization observed here → could someone upload it (I'm in a bit of a rush atm). --El Grafo (talk) 15:21, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Yann. --Tremonist (talk) 16:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose Per others. The quality probably nowhere is near the QP standards, not even talking about the FP. Check the middle woman nose. The quality is so poor that it is pixeled. -- Pofka (talk) 17:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Info It appears that this image was up-sampled, which introduced strong pixelization. I've uploaded what appears to be the original from the given source → @Yann, Tremonist, and Pofka: please have another look. --El Grafo (talk) 18:31, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Quality still is problematic. Pixels spots everywhere, especially on cheeks, but visible everywhere else as well. By featuring this we would put the lath way too low. -- Pofka (talk) 18:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Quality is better, but still not good enough. There is quite a lot of noise, and it needs restoration anyway. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment per Pofka and Yann. --Tremonist (talk) 12:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Btw, what’s the thing at the center of the bottom edge? Doesn’t look like part of the original photograph. --Kreuzschnabel 17:26, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:51, 28 May 2015 (UTC)