Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Green and Golden Bell Frog.jpg

File:The Green and Golden Bell Frog.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2019 at 02:21:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:The Green and Golden Bell Frog.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Green and Golden Bell Frog.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians
•  Info created by Bernard Spragg - uploaded and nominated by Boothsift -- BoothSift 02:21, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support As nominator-- BoothSift 02:21, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Small but very nice. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:43, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Really too small, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:51, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: I disagree. Frogs are not as large as you may expect them to be. I believe that the size here doesn't matter. --BoothSift 03:53, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Up to 11 cm, but the back is a little soft, too. I think we've had much sharper frogs nominated here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Size is not everything. That's what she said. -- Jakub Fryš (talk) 03:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

• Jakub Fryš, could you please skip the sexist comments/jokes. Keep it civil, that goes for some of your other (oppose) comments too. --Cart (talk) 08:31, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

• Sincerest appologies. -- Jakub Fryš (talk) 23:42, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Great! Yann (talk) 04:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Not very high resolution, but sharp and well-composed. Cmao20 (talk) 06:42, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Yes, small, but I'm forgiving when it's wildlife and everything else is great. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:04, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Cmao20 and Podzemnik. --Aristeas (talk) 08:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Piotr Bart (talk) 09:43, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yes quite small, but the main issue is the composition. The frog is looking away and head is shaded. Sharpness not great. Charles (talk) 11:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 12:05, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I quite like the mood but the composition is lacking. Too much blurred foreground where I would like to see more of the background with more lead room to the left. – Lucas 17:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Eatcha (talk) 18:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:55, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:47, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 12:23, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- KTC (talk) 08:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support-- --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 06:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:43, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:48, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 05:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians