Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunrise at Maligne lake.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Sunrise at Maligne lake.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2019 at 16:00:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Alberta
Info Canada, Rocky mountains, national park Jasper. Created, uploaded and nominated by Sergey Pesterev -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 16:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 16:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)- Support A tiny bit of noise, but nevertheless an extraordinary composition. Cmao20 (talk) 18:37, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --СССР (talk) 21:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Really nice, freezing mood! But will you remove a couple of dust spots that I marked for you, please? Thanks! --Podzemnik (talk) 21:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Done I removed dust and uploaded fullsize vesion. -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 16:32, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Great, thanks! --Podzemnik (talk) 21:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Sergey, it's really beautiful, but the snowy slopes of the mountains look like stylized prints or etchings to me, so I feel like you overprocessed the photo, maybe by using too much sharpening or something (I'm not sure what exactly caused this). Is there a way you could make them look more natural? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek I uploaded fullsize vesrion without oversharpening. Maybe the picture now look better. -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 16:32, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm really not seeing much difference other than a larger size. However, with the larger size, there are more details, and to my mind, that's a sufficient reason to Support. In the future, I hope you would please always provide the large size when you upload. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:22, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm really not seeing much difference other than a larger size. However, with the larger size, there are more details, and to my mind, that's a sufficient reason to
- Support.--Vulphere 23:22, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --BoothSift 23:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Seems a tad bit oversharpened to me but majestic nevertheless. -- KennyOMG (talk) 00:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:18, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 06:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Poco2 07:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Oppose I like it very much, but I have to oppose until the overprocessing commented on per Ikan is resolved. – LucasT 09:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Neutral The composition is wonderful. But please have a look, it's a little bit noisy and oversharpened. --XRay talk 17:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Millennium bug (talk) 17:18, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Eatcha (talk) 18:53, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:41, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Regretful oppose per XRay; take a look especially at the trees in the foreground. Daniel Case (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Daniel Case. -- B2Belgium (talk) 20:51, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per XRay --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:40, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Daniel Case --Llez (talk) 04:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per opposers. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose --A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 07:42, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- A-wiki-guest-user, per the guidelines you need to provide a reason when opposing. – LucasT 05:12, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Striked invalid oppose because missing reason. Restore the vote if a reason gets added. – LucasT 06:14, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Kruusamägi (talk) 23:38, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Milseburg (talk) 13:48, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per other comments about oversharpening (perhaps to compensate for the slightest bit of motion blur, but it's hard to tell). The D800 at ISO 100 should blow us away with clarity and detail. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Canada#Alberta
