Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SharonStone32.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:SharonStone32.JPG, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2012 at 18:00:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Teddyyy - uploaded by Teddyyy - nominated by Paris 16 (talk)
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Oppose -- Photographers photographing photographers; always interesting. Also love the old cameras. Unfortunately the photo is way too noisy.Fotoriety (talk) 23:10, 3 December 2012 (UTC)- Support Interesting subject. When you shoot film, you're always going to get grain, but grain has an organic texture which is much more palatable than digital noise. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- True. But this much grain with those conditions (subject posing, abundant light) is unneccesary. Kleuske (talk) 13:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 08:24, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Алый Король (talk) 03:57, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:32, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support I like it. Michael Barera (talk) 02:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support Would be nice to get some metadata for this image. Regards, Peter Weis (talk) 11:59, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Grainy, unsharp, and I think color pictures existed in 1991. (And I prefer this lady as she looks now than twenty years ago
).--Jebulon (talk) 10:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC) - Oppose The quality is just not up to it. --Ivar (talk) 07:38, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose too grainy. --Pine✉ 18:53, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 10:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
