Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salinas del Carmen 01.jpg

File:Salinas del Carmen 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2015 at 13:37:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Salinas del Carmen 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salinas del Carmen 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 13:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting composition and high EV. --Code (talk) 20:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I have a problem with the scale, proportion. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Info Perhaps this one [1] is useful, compare the size of the persons and the building --Llez (talk) 05:52, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
    •  Info I really wanted to know because I have visited the salt production flats in Guerrero Negro, Baja California Sur, Mexico because it is hard to get a sense of the vastness of the production grounds, that stretch as far as the eye can see, and it is hard to get a sense of scale. I photographed the trucks at the flats after they were loaded File:Salt production in Guerrero Negro.jpg and here File:Salt production in Guerrero Negro 2.jpg but found it impossible top capture the scale of the operation because it is just white and huge.... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--LivioAndronico talk 22:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Sssssssssss! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:01, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Something new. --Yann (talk) 08:22, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose: Noise is ok at around 6 MP, but the clipping is quite prominent I think, and avoidable, sorry. Really nice subject though. — Julian H.^✈ 14:01, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Julian, there's no clipping in this photo. The salt is bright as it should be, but not clipped. I can open this in Camera Raw and increase the exposure and see as more and more grains clip -- so it isn't even like it was clipped and recovered to leave an off-white area. The information is there. -- Colin (talk) 14:18, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Hm. There's definitely clipping if I open the image in gimp. The left flanks of the heaps are about 50% of 255. It's true that there are some pixels with lower values in-between, and I have to admit that there's more information there than I thought there was. But there is definitely not a lot of visible detail there, much less than without the clipping. I'll think about my vote. — Julian H.^✈ 14:47, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
      • I don't see 5% never mind 50% of the left side completely clipped. Plenty numbers in the 250s so quite reasonable to expect some of them (still a small minority) to be 255 in one channel but that in itself doesn't mean that channel is clipped -- just that it hit the max. In the nearest mound, there's only a tiny area that is 255/255/255. If you are seeing large areas at 255/255/255 then I have to wonder if your Gimp is applying some transform on the image you see. -- Colin (talk) 15:04, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
        • In that case, I'll remove my vote until I know where that difference comes from. — Julian H.^✈ 16:03, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 14:18, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 15:35, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support  ■ MMXX ^talk 15:42, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent, I like the contrast brown/white and the perspective.--Jebulon (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 22:27, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Superb. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:25, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Remarkable color contrast, good composition. --Laitche (talk) 21:14, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Altough IMO image is slightly tilted clockwise, D kuba (talk) 19:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:11, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:02, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 21:19, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects