Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SH-60 Seahawk approaches the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76).jpg

File:SH-60 Seahawk approaches the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2017 at 19:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:SH-60 Seahawk approaches the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SH-60 Seahawk approaches the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
•  Info created by Chief Petty Officer Spike Call - uploaded by The Photographer - nominated by Krassotkin --sasha (krassotkin) 19:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --sasha (krassotkin) 19:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I'm really not a fan of the composition. The only thing in focus is the highly uninteresting wheel, which obscures much of the aircraft carrier. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Unique, uncommon, extremely rare, has many important elements and makes me want to be a top gun --The Photographer 10:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per Julian. Yann (talk) 10:51, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Julian. A challenging picture to take, no doubt, but I am more wowed by CPO Call's daring in taking the image than the image itself, alas. Daniel Case (talk) 17:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Épico ^{(talk)/(contribs)} 19:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose bad photo... and just a thought: how much more killing machines we will promote here? -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 21:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Uncommon scene, in the second view becomes the human head the to main object. Best of Reportagefotografie. --Zoppo59 (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
• Mild  Support - It's obvious this photo is not going to be featured, but I disagree that it's a "bad photo". The top crop is not ideal, but otherwise, it gives a human element of the scene, as we see the naval pilot (co-pilot?) viewing the aircraft carrier just before landing. And as for "promoting killing machines": I don't think that supporting a good photo, which I believe this to be, is pro-war or anti-war; it's just pro-this photograph. But I do respect that for each of us, some kinds of images may produce a visceral reaction of disgust. In fact, I respect that much more than ideological opposition to a photograph, which seems to me to be kind of dangerous ground. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 09:46, 24 April 2017 (UTC)