Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ribat de Monastir 111.jpg

File:Ribat de Monastir 111.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2016 at 10:26:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ribat de Monastir 111.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ribat de Monastir 111.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info created by -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC) - uploaded by -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC) - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Looking at this more closely now, I see that the horizon is still a little, little bit tilted. Please correct this, it needs to be perfect for a FP. :) cart-Talk 11:04, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The cemetery in the foreground dominates the image. It doesn't work for me: neither a study of the cemetery nor a great photo of the fortress. Plus the ice cream van. -- Colin (talk) 17:11, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - a Quality Image, but I'm sorry to say that I don't find it a really good composition. I would recommend taking a photo that faces the shrine in the cemetery and fortress dead-on and cuts out most of what's in your foreground. Even then, others judging here may find the composition too complicated in the way Colin lays out above, because a lot of folks here want it to be clear which thing in the picture is the subject. I am fine with an entire view being the subject, but this picture feels somewhat random and unconvincing to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:14, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment dear cart-Talk done have a look now --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 22:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment dear Colin and Ikan Kekek so there is no "WAW" --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 22:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

• No "wow", I would say. But I was more specific than that. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Great lighting, and I think the composition is best appreciated at full size, with the cemetery plots creating a dazzling sea of pattern. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I like it as a whole landscape/view of the area. It's not often you get such a splendid backdrop to a cemetery. --cart-Talk 09:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 10:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan. A QI for sure but not an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 16:29, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 16:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)