Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Remote view of Jintai Temple dllu.jpg

File:Remote view of Jintai Temple dllu.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Remote view of Jintai Temple dllu.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Remote view of Jintai Temple dllu.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#China
•  Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 04:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- dllu (t,c) 04:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
• Why does the water appear very grainy? --SHB2000 (talk) 04:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

  I can only see slight grain when pixel peeping the 100 megapixel image, which I don't find distracting at all. Are you perhaps referring to the ripples reflecting the sky? dllu (t,c) 05:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Maybe – I'll wait and see what others have to say. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Those mini-ripples on the water look fine to me. It's what you get when you have a breeze blowing on a lake with no rolling waves. --Cart (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Fair enough –  Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Desertasad (talk) 05:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, but per the header, only "[e]ditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." Your account only has 24 edits as of 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC). --SHB2000 (talk) 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Wow, that is super high resolution. Toadspike (talk) 06:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 22:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Support LGTM -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Resokution is great and the motif interesting, but the lighting and composition/POV are not at FP level for me. Poco a poco (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Pretty uninteresting light and strangely washed out colours on the building. The sharpness could also be better.--Ermell (talk) 13:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

  I agree about the light. Regrettably, the sky was hazy. The colors are slightly washed out since it's very far away, but I've already applied aggressive dehazing compared to the original [1]. I'm surprised to see sharpness being mentioned since the sharpness seems fine to me on the 100 megapixel photo except perhaps for the extreme corners of the image. dllu (t,c) 20:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

  •  Comment To be fair, I was wrong about the sharpness.--Ermell (talk) 10:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Poco an Ermell. --Milseburg (talk) 19:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Support: mostly because I'm impressed by how skilfully dehazing was performed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

  Thank you so much for the nick-of-time support! dllu (talk) 05:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#China