Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reflektion Langkær Gymnasium.jpg/2

File:Reflektion Langkær Gymnasium.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2015 at 07:00:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Reflektion Langkær Gymnasium.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reflektion Langkær Gymnasium.jpg/2

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Info the reflection is in a great steel cylinder which is chiseled, you can see it here File:Langkær gymnasium i Tilst.jpg --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose If the photo attempts to present the artwork, I think it shouldn't require a second image as an explanation. If the intention is to stand on its own as a celebration of that artwork (which, I think, is the case), it should be more visually stunning than it is. As it is, there is no real composition and not much contrast either - except for the part with the brick building. — Julian H.^✈ 17:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I was fascinated by reflection and deformation of the building - just that. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I can see the alien's scream in this photo (reflection of the clouds) ... --Laitche (talk) 18:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm sorry, but it seems like a random shot, taken by being near that monument. I don't see it extraordinary or of outstanding quality. -- Pofka (talk) 19:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good idea but the contrast between artwork (painting?) and reflection does not work here, imo. --Laitche (talk) 07:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose QI perhaps, but the artwork and the reflection detract from each other rather than being complementary. Daniel Case (talk) 15:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral per others. Good idea, but has obvious problems. --Tremonist (talk) 13:59, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:21, 13 June 2015 (UTC)