Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo July 2009-1a.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Porto Covo July 2009-1a.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2009 at 22:51:47
- Info The sea and cliffs in Porto Covo, Portugal, by the end of the day. Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:51, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:51, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Info Camera Location missed. Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Done - Added, but not a requirement for FPC though. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:27, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nicely done • Richard • [®] • 23:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support nice --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO the lower part of the image (most of all the lower middle and the right lower corner) are not sharp at all. Sorry.--Mbz1 (talk) 04:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral As per Mbz1, plus it's somewhat impressive, but no real "wow" ... -- H005 (talk) 08:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - As Mbz1 including the sorry. Downtowngal (talk) 16:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks like one of my 5000 holiday snapshots. No wow, sorry. --Afrank99 (talk) 16:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- This image is not a snapshot. This is a good image, which has some problems that made me to oppose. May I please suggest to you to be a little bit more polite in your comments? Remember you'te talking about somebody else work. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry (Alvesgaspar!), I did't mean to step onto anyone's feet. I'm just trying to express my opinion on the image, and it's far, far away from being something special IMHO. And even being a good image is not enough for FP. For me it still looks like a snapshot (how do you know it's not one?), sorry again. --Afrank99 (talk) 14:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- This image is not a snapshot. This is a good image, which has some problems that made me to oppose. May I please suggest to you to be a little bit more polite in your comments? Remember you'te talking about somebody else work. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Otherwise really good, but per Mbz1. —kallerna™ 20:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Mbz1. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 14:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)