Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo January 2014-10a.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Porto Covo January 2014-10a.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2014 at 10:44:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Winter sea at Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)- Support --Citron (talk) 11:01, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment Looks nice, but I would crop a bit of sky so that the horizon is at 1/3 of the height from the top. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:19, 17 July 2014 (UTC)- Support that looks much more interesting than the current FP of that place ;) Kruusamägi (talk) 14:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 15:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk)
- Support--Jebulon (talk) 18:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support wow! (A much longer exposure would be interesting too) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- +1 !! Tripod, stopping down (and/or ND filter) and I believe you'd flood this page with FP to be. I'd also try with wide angle, but at the risk of endangering your life ;). - Benh (talk) 19:35, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Very nice scene, but the details seem to be rather soft, a bit like too strong denoising. Have you done something like that to the image (or is it a .jpg out of camera)? If yes, I am wondering whether you would consider uploading an un-/less treated version --DXR (talk) 19:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Neutral Yes I was about to point the exact same issue : too strong NR as far as I can tell. also, to complete my previous comment : [1], [2] and [3]. - Benh (talk) 19:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Info -- No NR at all. Maybe motion blur and water droplets in the air? Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- That's strange. Does the software you use maybe do some NR by default? This looks as heavily NR-edited as a jpeg directly from the camera. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 20:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'm too lazy to use Raw. I'll check the settings again, thanks. Anyway I remember well this stormy day and there was haze on the air. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Then we'll have to live with that. It's not a huge problem. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 21:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'm too lazy to use Raw. I'll check the settings again, thanks. Anyway I remember well this stormy day and there was haze on the air. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- That's strange. Does the software you use maybe do some NR by default? This looks as heavily NR-edited as a jpeg directly from the camera. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 20:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support But would also prefer a tighter crop from above. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 20:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment yes, a "golden crop" works better for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:38, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support Der Wanderer über dem Nebelmeer must be there somewhere. --Kadellar (talk) 13:04, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, he is taking the shot! Not Mr. Caspar Friedrich himself but a Portuguese descendant... Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yes indeed, thanks for that. I knew it reminded me of something, but just couldn't place it. Suich an excellent image (supported by me above) Coat of Many Colours (talk) 07:46, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, he is taking the shot! Not Mr. Caspar Friedrich himself but a Portuguese descendant... Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support Poco2 21:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support OK, but please add geo location.--XRay talk 05:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural
