Commons:Featured picture candidates/Pieris rapae edit2.jpg

File:Pieris rapae ce1.jpg (2nd attempt), featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2011 at 19:16:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pieris rapae ce1.jpg (2nd attempt) Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pieris rapae ce1.jpg (2nd attempt)

•  Info created by Bruce Marlin, edited and uploaded by LeavXC - nominated by IdLoveOne (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Info The original image was considered too tight (last nomination) a crop to succeed, so this edited and expanded version was created in an attempt to satisfy Commons's aesthetic, so I wanted to see if you guys like it more. --IdLoveOne (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- IdLoveOne (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose unnatural background, bad composition. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
  • It's basic black.. --IdLoveOne (talk) 07:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Alchemist. Maybe a crop extension to the left would do some good.--Snaevar (talk) 23:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

ALT

•  Info Because I really, really, really, really, really think this is a good and feature-worthy photo (unless someone can make a good case why it isn't), I present my own alteration alternative. --IdLoveOne (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --IdLoveOne (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Snaevar (talk) 12:24, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Marmoulak (talk) 00:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose no, still bad background for a living butterfly. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:49, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
  • I get that, IMO though the quality of the insect itself is redeeming, and black is common for a scientific or biological image. --IdLoveOne (talk) 01:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good picture imo. And I also do not see a problem with a black background. --Danny (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Per Danny, main subject is Pieris rapae, not background --Llez (talk) 06:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral I also don´t like this trend towards black backgrounds. It´s not printer friendly, and in terms of aesthetics the color sceme and contrast (pale yellow / black) do not appeal to me.--Nikopol (talk) 15:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:07, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --McIntosh Natura (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 20:56, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Miguel Bugallo 23:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

The chosen alternative is: File:Pieris_rapae_edit2.jpg