Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paraglider near Nebelhorn.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Paraglider near Nebelhorn.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2017 at 09:31:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Previous version nominations |
---|
Alternative[edit]
|
Lightroom edit
[edit]Info Colin's edit. Same as above, but edited in Lightroom (which supports 16bit colour space => greater quality).
Support --Miha (talk) 08:49, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Lucasbosch, XRay, Daniel Case, Ikan Kekek, and Milseburg: @MZaplotnik, Thennicke, King of Hearts, Livioandronico2013, and Martin Falbisoner: @Άργος, PetarM, and Poco a poco:
Support -- Colin (talk) 09:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Btw, Miha, Lightroom supports 32-bit floating point HDR, which is far greater image depth than even 16-bit integer, and more than our 10- to 14-bit sensors can output currently. Thus one can heavily manipulate the raw file without causing posterisation, vs 8-bit JPG. Even a 16-bit tiff will posterise in the highlights if manipulated, because a standard gamma does not allocate very many bits to the brightest levels, vs a raw file which is the opposite because of its linear gamma. -- Colin (talk) 09:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info and the edit!! It seems that the Gimp is getting 32-bit support in the next stable version (2.10) too, currently only the unstable (2.9) version has it, whereas the stable version (2.8) only supports 8-bits. --Miha (talk) 00:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Btw, Miha, Lightroom supports 32-bit floating point HDR, which is far greater image depth than even 16-bit integer, and more than our 10- to 14-bit sensors can output currently. Thus one can heavily manipulate the raw file without causing posterisation, vs 8-bit JPG. Even a 16-bit tiff will posterise in the highlights if manipulated, because a standard gamma does not allocate very many bits to the brightest levels, vs a raw file which is the opposite because of its linear gamma. -- Colin (talk) 09:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Support – Lucas 09:46, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Thennicke (talk) 10:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Support - I really like this version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:58, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Support This one's great! --M★Zaplotnik (edits) 13:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Support It work now. --Mile (talk) 13:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Support Better, indeed. Poco2 21:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Support Colin saves the day! (Literally ...) Daniel Case (talk) 23:10, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Question shall we replace the old version by this file after voting, as keeping three separate versions makes only little sense (this version is of much better quality) --Miha (talk) 00:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Miha: Jaz bi zgornje dve obrisal kot {{duplicate}} od tele, ne bi nič dodatno menjal ker samo plac zavzavme dodatno. Tukaj pa makar spremeni ime fajla pa dodaj opis iz originala. --Mile (talk) 07:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Rough translation of Mile's message: I would mark the other two files as {{Duplicate}} of this new version. Additionally, you can change filename of this one (...)
- Ok, good suggestion. Hvala :) --Miha (talk) 07:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Support --Karelj (talk) 11:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Germany
The chosen alternative is: File:Paraglider near Nebelhorn (Lightroom edit).jpg