Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Padma Bridge, November2021(2).jpg

File:Padma Bridge, November2021(2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2022 at 13:11:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Padma Bridge, November2021(2).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Padma Bridge, November2021(2).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
•  Info created by Nahian Bin Shafiq – uploaded by Nahian Bin Shafiq – nominated by Mehediabedin -- Mehediabedin (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mehediabedin (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very poor quality and not a Quality Image, either, sorry. Very rarely, cellphone pics have been featured, but this looks like a typical cellphone pic in that most of it is extremely noisy with artifacts and unsharp at full size. Very nice composition, though, and I'd love to see a photo by Nahian that's taken with a good camera. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:08, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan Kekek. Nevertheless I really like the thumbnail! -- Wolf im Wald 16:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan Kekek and Der Wolf im Wald. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 16:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Perfect composition, and I like the blueish-monochrome colours here. If only it weren’t for quality. Yes, we’re talking about 48 megapixels but the issues are clearly visible even at 50% view (= downscaled to 12 meagpixels). Next time you’re there, please make sure to have a better camera with you – your photographic skills clearly deserve one! --Kreuzschnabel 16:27, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

 Comment Unfortunately not everyone whose photographic skills deserve a better camera can afford or even lend one - especially in countries like Bangladesh, where photographic equipment is even more expensive than in European countries while the average income is a lot lower. But I agree with you, that it would be wonderful if the photographer could take more images with better equipment and bring them here. --Kritzolina (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose per other opposers. --Ivar (talk) 17:46, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunatly, the quality is just not there for an FP. NightWolf1223 (talk) 03:12, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunately, the poor quality makes it unworthy for an FP. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:20, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose per poor quality noted here by others. Daniel Case (talk) 16:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 20:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)