Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PK Truck on N-5 near Thatta asv2020-02 img1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:PK Truck on N-5 near Thatta asv2020-02 img1.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2021 at 12:53:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Trucks and buses
Info A decorated truck (a.k.a. jingle truck) on the N-5 National Highway, Sindh, Pakistan ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 12:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 12:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:56, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --What a striking photo! Aliwal2012 (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Fun! And a fine composition to boot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Hanooz 22:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support a tiny bit oversharpened maybe - but very cool --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Great colourful photo that at first glance I enthusiastically supported but it appears 'post-processing' has created an 'edge-effect' that is most noticeable around the 'straw sack' on top of the truck and IMO should be resolved for FP --SM:!) (talk) 08:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)- regretful oppose per SM:!): There are some very clear signs of over-sharpening (e.g. the whole front of the truck, halos around the birds in the sky ...) --El Grafo (talk) 10:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose good light conditions and awesome truck, but the overall result is dissapointing. The photo is clearly overprocessed (per other opposers) and the front of the truck is imo not sharp enough. Maybe the shutter speed 1/250 was not the best solution for a moving subject or focusing was not perfect. --Ivar (talk) 11:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment Neutral
Weak support for now –
- Comment I have changed my neutral to weak support above; apart from the sharpening question, it is a very good photo for me, espec. if we consider the quite high resolution. --Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- I have a similar photo, is it better? --A.Savin 15:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Both are good IMHO, but I would just try to reduce the sharpening on the present candidate and apply stronger sharpening only partially – it’s so a nice photo! --Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Done. --A.Savin 12:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 17:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others --Commonists 17:32, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 17:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose -- per othersSeven Pandas (talk) 00:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulphere 07:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Front of the truck not very sharp, and though the image is quite nice it is also a bit quite too empty IMO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Regretful oppose per others; apart from that I think the image could stand some cropping in on the left so it includes just the road on the bottom. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2 021 (UTC)
- Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice composition and item but per above, poor quality RolfHill (talk) 13:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --StellarHalo (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
